¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Qrp-labs and a Huff and Puff circuit board

 

VFO instability and drift are symptoms of parts failure or implementation errors.
Sometimes its just plain broken and needs to be fixed.

If it does not have a regulated supply it will be unstable even with vacuum tubes.
If the circuit use poor quality or non temperature compensated parts they are
also trouble for drift.

I've also seen cases where just changing the oscillator tube improved matters.

HG10B with a OA2 added to stabilize the VFO volage does get better and if?
some of the caps are replaced with COG and a mix of N750 parts it will be stable.
Allowing the heat to escape doesn't hurt.? Doing this is more a matter of time
paying attention to the drift then chaning from zero temp coefficient to
-750temp coefficient until drift is near zero or going the other way. Iterate
as needed.

How stable is needed varies with application for CW or SSB less than
100hz/hour is attainable.??Getting to good enough for AM anything
under 1khz an hour will do but its easy to do much better than that.

All the same things apply to solid state VFOs.? I have built many and 1hz
an hour is not that hard with patience and maintaining a stable temperature.

Primary offenders is heat always.? Toroids like FT50-7 are about the best
at +35ppm for temperature. Varicap diodes are terrible and can easily
exceed +100PPM and also that varies with what applied votlage so
stabilizing by temperature compensation is tricky at best.? In some cases
junction transistors operated at the less an ideal operating point will heat
internally and cause drift. Most published designs are at best sloppy
and rarely was the effort made to even mention how to make it stable.

The problem with H&P is its always bouncing between two frequencies and
usually that is anywhere from 20 to 80hz.? Narrower than that and the VFO
can move out of lock to the next range up/down as the time to sample goes up.
So that required the VFO to be at least marginally stable.? Also it needs a way
to turn it off while tuning or it will fight you.

Allison?


Re: Qrp-labs and a Huff and Puff circuit board

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Mike,

Looks like we are comtemplating the same problem.?? I have a highly modified DX-60A/HG-10 setup.? The HG-10 is stock and perfectly adequate for my normal 75M AM usage.? However.... now I am wanting to put it on CW and the HG-10 drift would be a nuisance and also I have limited desk/shack space and the HG-10 takes up too much room on my desk for what it does..

I'm considering picking up Labs VFO kit and packaging it for general use so I can use it on other projects as well.

After reviewing my DX-60 mods some tweaks were necessary to accommodate CW which I didn't even give a thought to originally.? So it is waiting for some bench time.

73 Jack KZ5A







?


On 4/9/2019 10:36 AM, Mike Donovan wrote:

Thank you all that took time to weigh in on this topic.? I have a few dds vfo's already (probably 5 including my Qrp-Labs arduino shield)? ?What I was trying to see was there a modern implementation of the h&p to use on some of the older style of vfo's.? I want to build a stable vfo without resorting to either arduino or computer control.? ?Having said that I am going to use the arduino shield as an external vfo for my Heathkit DX-60b currently under restoration.? ?I would love to use the Heathkit HG-10b external vfo but it wanders all over the band.
Anyway.? Thanks
Mike? Ve7epq?



Re: QCX-SSB: SSB with your QCX transceiver

 

When time permits I will try the new code.

The result with the last version was, unintelligible TX, and with tweaks
and fussing it was "terrible audio can barely understand you"..

Allison


Re: Load impedance for Si5351a?

 

An AC short at the output would be less than desirable and does increase
the devices power needs and heating.

Better would be 10 to 50 ohm series and then short to ground.? Or turn
the oscillator off in software!

FYI the 5pf spec is for output rise time measurement.

Allison


Re: Qrp-labs and a Huff and Puff circuit board

 

Thank you all that took time to weigh in on this topic.? I have a few dds vfo's already (probably 5 including my Qrp-Labs arduino shield)? ?What I was trying to see was there a modern implementation of the h&p to use on some of the older style of vfo's.? I want to build a stable vfo without resorting to either arduino or computer control.? ?Having said that I am going to use the arduino shield as an external vfo for my Heathkit DX-60b currently under restoration.? ?I would love to use the Heathkit HG-10b external vfo but it wanders all over the band.
Anyway.? Thanks
Mike? Ve7epq?


Re: Load impedance for Si5351a?

 

Thanks, Alan.? At least there is some evidence that it won't self-destruct when AC-shorted!

73,
Steve VE3SMA


QCX Repair

 

Hi All, I am looking for someone hopefully local or at least in the UK to repair my 80m QCX. I will pay for the repair. My QCX was delivered fully assembled ?and worked perfectly for a time but will not now transmit. I suspect that I may have transmitted when the antenna was not connected although things appeared to go ?astray ?when I changed from 12 to 15 volts psu?

Roger Taylor
G4CGU


Shout out to Mustafa Tan for the lightAPRS and tip

Fred
 

My two lightAPRS units are presently being tested on the ground for a possible pico balloon launch in June. Thanks to the excellent instructions and engineering by the lightAPRS team, I had an easy time setting up these APRS trackers. An important tip, make sure you place the libraries in the correct file.
Thanks Mustafa for a great product.
Regards, Fred NT6T


Re: Load impedance for Si5351a?

 

I also wonder about how well the Si5351a would react to an AC short.
Steve,

I ran a U3S with a TX muting that simply shorted the output of the coupling capacitor to ground via a BS170. It is still working. But the consensus was that it is not a good idea.
I've no real knowledge but I do not see the loading being critical for use as a calibration tool. Maybe the 5pF is to maintain a sharp waveform. It is fed into BS170s in QRP Labs projects, much more than 5pF.

73 Alan G4ZFQ

I'm thinking about putting in a series resistor between the


QCX beacon enhancement possibility #poll

 

I was thinking about a possibility for a feature that could be incorporated in these radios Hans has been designing.? Since the ability to interface with a GPS is already there it would be an interesting option to have a menu item that could turn on a feature which appends the latituge / longitude GPS coordinates to the beacon.? I wanted to poll the members of this list to see how many others think this would be a valuable feature and if there is enough interest perhaps Hans could add it to a future firmware release if there are enough remaining resources on the microcontroller.? I was thinking that this could allow the beacon to act as an emergency locator transmitter when configured as such.? There could be other reasons for it as well.

So the question for this poll is:? Please choose your level of interest for addind lat/long to the beacon function.

Best regards
Joe ve3vxo

Results

See Who Responded


Re: QCX-SSB: SSB with your QCX transceiver

 

For those who are interested; there is now an improved version of the QCX-SSB experiment, it can be found here:?? In the meantime, I got quite a number of experimenters who reported a successful modification of their QCX and could make QRP SSB contacts.
?
Note that if you plan to upgrade, it is important to remove C31 and add a 10uF capacitor at C32. This will resolve an issue with Q6 (which was not digitally switching resulting in degraded IMD and thermal instability). This fix together with the more accurate signal processing of the new firmware, improves the IMD performance, carrier+side-band rejection and spectral purity considerably. Please let me know how this works out for you. Note there is still room for further optimizations like mitigating the PA/key-shaping introduced phase-errors (that occur especially at smaller amplitudes), and the effect that reducing C32? improves the IMD.
?
Another interesting thing to try out is the use of constant-amplitude SSB feature (set drive parameter to 8); this modulation scheme will solely transmit speech-information via the phase of the carrier (PM). This of course degrades the IMD performance, but quite unexpectedly this seems to be quite beneficial in weak-signal conditions when your signal just needs to be popping out above the noise-floor to make yourself heard: it occurs to me that using a constant-amplitude with worse IMD will actually improve the intelligibility in these cases.
?
73, Guido
PE1NNZ


Well, it appears that the QCX-17 is getting out on 15m too...

n4qa at_hotmail.com
 



The QCX-17's lpf does attenuate output on 21060 kHz a few dB...could bypass it, I reckon.

72 / 73,
Bill, N4QA


Load impedance for Si5351a?

 

I am building a general purpose LF/MF/HF/VHF/UHF "crystal calibrator" using a Progrock and a QLG1.? But I am not sure how to deal with the RF outputs from the Progrock.? I do have them AC-coupled through 0.1 microfarad capacitors.?

The Si5351a data sheet only specifies it for a 5 pF load.? I've read in other places that 50 ohm loads result in poor crosstalk between the outputs.? But this is of little concern in the current application.? I am a bit concerned about heating....the Progrock is drawing >50mA with some combinations of output frequencies and the current does seem to depend quite a bit on the load impedance (even a few inches of open-circuited coax has a noticeable effect).? I also wonder about how well the Si5351a would react to an AC short.

I'm thinking about putting in a series resistor between the Progrock/blocking capacitor and the output of my box, or an L network of resistors, to reduce the loading on the Si5351a while providing a low impedance source (50 ohms perhaps), since there seems to be more output power than I need for this specific purpose.? At some point I may add a multiplier circuit to produce microwave harmonics - that would benefit from lots of drive, so I don't want to attenuate too much and have to amplify back up again.

Any useful thoughts on this topic?

73,
Steve VE3SMA


Re: Sending saved message #problem

 

Thanks Bill for your reply, yes you were correct I should have fully scrutinised the manual. As my old boss used to say "if in doubt go back and read the instructions". Unforetunatley the rig no longer transmits so I am now trying to find some one locally to help me.

73 Roger G4CGU


Re: QSX to be shown at FDIM this year?

 

If you haven't been to one of these conferences, put it on your Bucket List. With possibly one exception, all of the speakers are top-notch, and the list of speakers includes Hans. His talk last year was both entertaining and informative, and I'm sure it will be the same again this year. The only thing that could make it better is a QSX order form! There are plenty of other events that make it fun, too (e.g., Vendor night, show-n-tell, banquet), plus the Dayton Hamvention is about a half-hour away. FDIM is a "two-birds-with-one-stone" item on your Bucket List.

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, April 9, 2019, 8:19:17 AM EDT, SkipF, NT1G <skip.flem@...> wrote:



On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 6:07 AM John AE5X <ae5x@...> wrote:
FDIM would be even better... ;-)
--
John AE5X


Re: My morse keys

 

I've been doing that successfully for years. No need for even the heat-shrink. Works wonderfully. Here's


Re: QSX to be shown at FDIM this year?

SkipF, NT1G
 


On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 6:07 AM John AE5X <ae5x@...> wrote:
FDIM would be even better... ;-)
--
John AE5X


Re: QSX to be shown at Friedrichshafen this year?

 

One can hope!!

Jack, W8TEE

On Tuesday, April 9, 2019, 6:07:51 AM EDT, John AE5X <ae5x@...> wrote:


FDIM would be even better... ;-)
--
John AE5X


Re: QSX to be shown at Friedrichshafen this year?

 

FDIM would be even better... ;-)
--
John AE5X


QSX to be shown at Friedrichshafen this year?

Ken N9VV
 

Anyone know if QSX might be ready by Friedrichshafen this June 21-23?
<URL:>

eagerly watching every day,
72/73 de Ken N9VV
--
?°À³å(¥Ä)³å/?