¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

#clock firmware development request #clock

 

Hi Hans, Hi all !

By playing around with the GPS Clock Kit,
i wondered, if nobody else than me has the wish to to be able to display the latitude and longitude in different formats.
The clock shows?decimal degrees, so to have
the possibility to change to
degrees minutes seconds?or
degrees decimal minutes would be nice.

What do you think ?

73 de DC1MAK micha


Re: QCX died after one QSO

Ham Radio
 

Try pulling?out the micro-controller and reseat.?

If no joy, recheck all the solder joints and touch up as required.
--
73, Bernie, VE3FWF


Re: QCX died after one QSO

 

Yes I have. Before it would start ok with a couple of on/off cycles.


Re: QCX died after one QSO

Clint Sharp
 

Have you done the micro controller start up mod detailed on Hans¡¯ QCX pages?

On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 08:15, Andy Kerrison <drewk101@...> wrote:

I¡¯ve had my 40m QCX built and working with WSPR for a while and decided it was time to try a CW QSO.

?

All went fine, worked a local contact for over 30 minutes and then shut it down.

?

Now when I connect power I get the dread top row of blocks.

?

I¡¯m at a loss as it was working fine and then this.

?

I have limited test equipment so the next step I guess is check the voltages as per the instructions and check for obvious soldering faults.

?

Any pointers would be appreciated.

?

Andy

G0OEY

?

?

--
Clint. M0UAW IO83

No trees were harmed in the sending of this mail. However, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.


QCX died after one QSO

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I¡¯ve had my 40m QCX built and working with WSPR for a while and decided it was time to try a CW QSO.

?

All went fine, worked a local contact for over 30 minutes and then shut it down.

?

Now when I connect power I get the dread top row of blocks.

?

I¡¯m at a loss as it was working fine and then this.

?

I have limited test equipment so the next step I guess is check the voltages as per the instructions and check for obvious soldering faults.

?

Any pointers would be appreciated.

?

Andy

G0OEY

?

?


Re: Hellschreiber on U3S #u3s

 

Ther's also a speed setting for Slow Hell.

Needs to be about 17.

This speed setting will tend to effect the aspect ratio of the characters,
so you can tweak it along with the FSK settings if required to make your
characters look right.

Although you probably know this already, you'll lose sensitivity on Slow Hell
when it comes to weak signals. Slow Hell loses about 10db or maybe more
compared to FSKCW (QRSS). But it does add a bit of variety on the grabbers ;-)

73 de Andy


Re: Hellschreiber on U3S #u3s

 

You need to use the Slow Hell mode for grabber
work.

Use an Fsk bandwidth setting of about 4 or 5 Hz.

If my memory serves me right and there have
been no fundamental firmware changes, then
the U3 should send out normal Fskcw for Qrss
work at the normal 4 to 5Hz, and then double
up the Slow Hell bandwidth so that it is nice
and readable on a grabber screen.

That should get you started.

73 de Andy


Re: Solder temp for QCX Board

 

Thanks to all..... I'm using 350C and it seems to be be pretty similar to the 30 watt iron I had before. I appreciate all the input.

73, ?Robert KR4VT


Hellschreiber on U3S #u3s

 

Is anyone successfully using Hellschreiber mode on U3S with firmware v3.12a?

I just tried regular and DX Hellschreiber today for the first time and am getting a splattering mess about 20 Hz wide when the signal is monitored using Argo software. ?I regularly use Hellschreiber with my OpenBeacon transmitters and I know what it should look like.

So either I'm missing something obvious or maybe there¡¯s a U3S firmware bug.

73,

John
AA7US


Re: BS170 amp input impedance

 

Justin,

For 2m you may find the phase noise fairly high.? Just listening to it bare
with my?2M system suggests that.

For 222 and higher its not what you want to use the harmonics sound bad!
For 432 the third harmonics sound like FM modulated with white noise.

The problem as you go up is so route the signals you need traces and the
traces are transmission lines and likely low impedance at VHF and up so
your going to source current no matter what.? 1pf loading? at 10mhz is?
not significant, at 144 it multiplied by 144 and is significant.

For a quadrature case crosstalk is not an issue they are the same frequency.
I do not think, subject to testing, you can get a 90 degree quadrature at 144
as the divisors are getting small.

FYI a hybrid at 144mhz will give you plenty of bandwidth easily 1% for
amplitude and phase is rarely an issue for wider.? ( I do IQ)? A hybrid
is easy at 144 and a clean lo is all that's needed (everything has to
be well shielded).? I presume you really don't want to do FM with IQ rx.

The alternate is use a fixed LO (crystal) split into I/Q and up convert both
to whatever.? The up convert can be then anything that decent at HF
and not harmonically related.?and a 5351 one channel might do that
well.? I did that with SI570 but that is a cleaner part.

Basically what is fine at 10M does not fly at 2M.? ?I build for 2m for very
low target NF.? I want to hear signals below -144dbm.? The quality of
the LO is critical as at 2M and up you will hear it!? ?Look at KK7Bs work.??

For easy build a good 10M (one that can tune 28 to 30mhz) IQ RX and
put a well done down converter using a 116mhz LO.? Then get a
11 element beam minimum (more like 15 or more would be better).

Allison





Re: Ultimate3s v3.12a release and CW operation

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks Bill, I appreciate the clarification.

Brian VE7JKZ


On 9/15/2018 4:45 AM, Bill Oelker wrote:

Hi Brian, I have my U3S on a 10M beacon frequency. And I use the QRP-Labs PA kit. The shaping is accomplished on the PA kit assembly. So on your U3S if you don't use that particular PA you would not select any shaping options in the U3S menu. And there would be no shaping accomplished as far as the U3S goes. There is an app-note? AN-005 on the website that deals with your intended situation . Best of Luck Bill KN8DMK


Re: Ultimate3s v3.12a release and CW operation

 

Hi Brian, I have my U3S on a 10M beacon frequency. And I use the QRP-Labs PA kit. The shaping is accomplished on the PA kit assembly. So on your U3S if you don't use that particular PA you would not select any shaping options in the U3S menu. And there would be no shaping accomplished as far as the U3S goes. There is an app-note? AN-005 on the website that deals with your intended situation . Best of Luck Bill KN8DMK


Re: BS170 amp input impedance

 

Allison,?

in order of importance to me is the following,?

1) drive level, those SBL 1 mixers want +7dBm?
2) frequency I'd like to try reaching 2 meters, 222Mhz would be nice. 432MHz would need additional steps.?
3) I need a quadrature pair, so I will need at the bare minimum a pair functional channels.?

with that said I understand the 51531 performs better as the load impedance presented to it increases, with some digital ICs coming in around 10K ohms I would hope that's high enough to minimize the crosstalk issue. Also thank you for mentioning the VGA driver parts I'll have a look, however I fear they too will be low impedance parts. if so I'm back to op-amps and additional parts.?

-Justin N2TOH?

P.S. as you already stated it's a compromise when your trying to keep the cost down.?

P.P.S. the end goal here is to dust off this KK7B phasing board I've had in my junk collection for the last 25 years...??


Re: BS170 amp input impedance

David Bowman
 

Hi Justin.

One answer is to use a Modamp as a buffer?? After all the BS170 can deliver 300mW or more and the typical SBL1 will need just 10mW....or perhaps 20 or 50mW if you select one of the hi drive versions.

The mod-amps will have a reasonably small gain variation to 300 MHz unlike the BS170 and if you are concerned that the silicon labs chip will not like 50 ohms as a load, you can use a higher gain mod-amp with a resistive pad on the input.

Sounds like a nice project.

73

David




Re: My latest QCX 40 problem...

 

Thanks, I will.


Re: My latest QCX 40 problem...

 

I would check the LPF capacitors.

On 14/09/2018 19:29, Jim - K9DD wrote:
When I finished building the kit I had receiver problems, all traced to bad/cold solder joints. The transmitter appeared to be working fine, 5 watts out with 15 VDC supply. Then while further testing, I found a bad coax jumper which caused me to transmit briefly into a high SWR. Since then power has been low (2.7 watts) and high current draw on transmit (700 ma). Receiver is superb so I'm assuming T1 is correct. Not having real test gear, I shotgunned it by replacing the 3 finals and Q6. Nothing changed. Can anyone offer suggestions as to what to check next?? Are there any other component failures that could cause it without affecting the receiver?

Thanks,
Jim - K9DD


My latest QCX 40 problem...

 

When I finished building the kit I had receiver problems, all traced to bad/cold solder joints. The transmitter appeared to be working fine, 5 watts out with 15 VDC supply. Then while further testing, I found a bad coax jumper which caused me to transmit briefly into a high SWR. Since then power has been low (2.7 watts) and high current draw on transmit (700 ma). Receiver is superb so I'm assuming T1 is correct. Not having real test gear, I shotgunned it by replacing the 3 finals and Q6. Nothing changed. Can anyone offer suggestions as to what to check next?? Are there any other component failures that could cause it without affecting the receiver?

Thanks,
Jim - K9DD


Ultimate3s v3.12a release and CW operation

 

I built the kit a few weeks ago and want to use it with GW3UEP's 100W PA on 630m. The last post I can find relating to CW is #18874. Ken G4APB notes that TX CW works as long as SHAPING is set to 00. An earlier posts notes that the Potentiometer tune function does not work.

Am I to assume that in CW there is no waveform shaping and I should implement shaping elsewhere. Perhaps as GW3UEP shows in his 100W PA keying circuit.

Brian VE7JKZ


Re: BS170 amp input impedance

 

Tim,

Don't be silly... of course its macro hurts.

Allison


Re: BS170 amp input impedance

 

Justin,

I can see wanting or needing the bandwidth.? FYI the bs170 will not make it to 300mhz
and even 6pf at 100mhz is getting to 200 ohms.

If cross talk is the concern the easiest way is multiple 5351s.? IF driving levels are the problem
then maybe a fast video driver or MMIC.

The 5351 can drive fairly low impedance but the cross talk to other channels goings up.
ITs the trade for that level of capability and low cost.

Allison