Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: QRPLabs QCX Enclosure Dimensions
Brian,
Thanks, I have that info from the QRPGuys web site.? I like that case except that the BNC connector is floating and not attached to the case.? I wanted to make a clamshell style case similar to what QRPLabs is now selling.? That means the case interior would need enough room to be able to feed the BNC connector through the side panel and then rotate the board down inside the case.? So I figured I'd use the interior dimension from the QRPLabs case since that's the way they mount their QCX board.? But ultimately I started thinking about the work involved in cutting/drilling the PCB material, making shaft and switch extensions, assembly, painting, and decals, and laziness overcame me.? I decided to get the QRPLabs QCX enclosure instead (actually ordered two). Al KD4EO |
Re: Heavy industry report
Scroll down the email young man, they are all there ;-) On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, 12:10 David Wilcox via Groups.Io <Djwilcox01=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Heavy industry report
On 12/07/2018 10:10, David Wilcox via Groups.Io wrote:
How do I download the photos of your shop you described in your email? ?All I get is sections from your catalog.Dave, Best go to the bottom of the email and use the io link /g/QRPLabs/message/25133 I assume you are setup to not get sent attachments? 73 Alan G4ZFQ |
Re: Heavy industry report
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHow do I download the photos of your shop you described in your email? ?All I get is sections from your catalog. Dave K8WPE On Jul 12, 2018, at 4:11 AM, Hans Summers <hans.summers@...> wrote:
|
Re: Wacky voltage readings
I will save the voltage issue on R2 for further investigation.Charles, This comes directly from IC11, the regulator. Checking C43-46, I found that C45 faults to ground on both sides.This goes to pins 5 and 12 of IC4. You may lift those with a pin. It looks as if the problem is a solder bridge or IC4. >Of course that¡¯s complicated by the fact that C45 is connected to R9, making it hard to isolate R9 for testing. R9 has a resistance to ground of slightly less than 10 ohms on one side, and 110 ohms on the other. If the end connected to IC5 pin 6 is 110 ohms to ground then the fault is on the other end. C45, now removed, or something along that track. Also, current drain idling is about 117 ma at 12.8 volts on the bus.Seems about right, I do not know what is specified. But something is wrong with the 5V line. 73 Alan G4ZFQ |
Re: #QCX Case
#qcx
Hi Al 300 cases arrived here yesterday from the manufacturer. I now have extra helpers here in the lab, working on packing the enclosures into an additional layer of bubble-wrap packing and then into an additional cardboard box. So right now I have THREE ladies here in the lab working hard to try to clear all the box orders (XYL is one), we hope within the next couple of days to have them all sent out. Currently according to my records there have been 524 enclosures orders, out of a total of 550 enclosures sent to me by the manufacturer (100 first batch, 50 Friedrichshafen booth sales, 100 second batch, 300 third batch). Therefore even after we have cleared all the pending orders, there are still 26 enclosures in stock. So, if you are quick with your order, you can get one :-) The next enclosures batch will be some weeks later, after July 20th when the German factory which designed/produced the enclosures, returns from holidays.? 73 Hans G0UPL On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:25 AM Al Clark <hotdogx@...> wrote: Are there any cases currently in stock? If I were to order one just wondering approximately when it would be shipped to the USA. |
Re: Wacky voltage readings
First, all ICs are in the correct orientation, so that¡¯s not it. I will save the voltage issue on R2 for further investigation.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Checking C43-46, I found that C45 faults to ground on both sides. I removed it to see if the problem was the capacitor, and it made no difference.I¡¯m assuming that since C43-46 have identical function, that this is related to the problem. I have not yet found where the source of this fault to ground might be. Although the soldering around IC5 and surrounding parts is not as pretty as I like to see it (NOT MY BUILD!) I can¡¯t find anything shorted to ground - yet. Of course that¡¯s complicated by the fact that C45 is connected to R9, making it hard to isolate R9 for testing. R9 has a resistance to ground of slightly less than 10 ohms on one side, and 110 ohms on the other. The other three similar resistors have 500K or more to ground. So, presumably something in the chain from pins 5 & 12 of Q4, or the path between C45 and R9 is grounded. I guess I¡¯ll have to keep looking. Also, current drain idling is about 117 ma at 12.8 volts on the bus. I¡¯m finished with live testing now, because I will need to replace C45. It didn¡¯t survive surgery. Again, thanks for your help, Alan. 73, Charles - NK8O On Jul 11, 2018, at 4:00 PM, Alan G4ZFQ <alan4alan@...> wrote:I show 19.91K from R2 to ground, and 9.96K for R1 plus 9.95K for R2.C6 shows resistance across it of 9.96K, which it should since it parallels R1, so I do not identify a problem there. I get 3.98V at R2 on one side, |
Re: #QCX Case
#qcx
Are there any cases currently in stock? If I were to order one just wondering approximately when it would be shipped to the USA.
|
Re: Wacky voltage readings
I show 19.91K from R2 to ground, and 9.96K for R1 plus 9.95K for R2.C6 shows resistance across it of 9.96K, which it should since it parallels R1, so I do not identify a problem there. I get 3.98V at R2 on one side, Charles, I get 3.98V at R2 on one side,It should be 5V on one end. What current is the CQX taking? Looks like the centre of R1/2 is going to ground when IC4 is switching. Check for shorts to ground on C43-C46 and the associated pins of IC4. and nominally 0.15 volts on the other side. That is also what I show +/- 0.05V at the four points on T1 which is quite low for the published specification of ~2.36V. And I still have the following on IC-5, way out of spec:It is possible but more likely is a solder bridge. Again, it is possible one of the capacitors is faulty. Are the ICs correctly oriented? 73 Alan G4ZFQ |
Re: Wacky voltage readings
Thanks for the suggestions Alan. I show 19.91K from R2 to ground, and 9.96K for R1 plus 9.95K for R2. C6 shows resistance across it of 9.96K, which it should since it parallels R1, so I do not identify a problem there. I get 3.98V at R2 on one side, and nominally 0.15 volts on the other side. That is also what I show +/- 0.05V at the four points on T1 which is quite low for the published specification of ~2.36V. And I still have the following on IC-5, way out of spec:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
pin 1 10.99v (2.64) pin 2 0.46v (2.46) pin 3 0.17v (2.26) pin 4 0.00v (0.00) pin 5 0.12v (2.28) pin 6 0.15v (2.46) pin 7 12.1v (2.44) pin 8 12.8v (11.67) (input voltage 13.1, bus voltage is 12.8v after the protective diode.) IC 6 is worse: pin 1 11v pin 2 11v pin 3 11v pin 4 0.0v pin 5 11.4 pin 6 11.4 pin 7 11v pin 8 128v Is it possible IC-4 is fried and that¡¯s where the voltages or lack there of originate? 73, Charles On Jul 11, 2018, at 2:10 AM, Alan G4ZFQ <alan4alan@...> wrote:I get normal voltage readings at Clk0 and Clk1. That's where it stops. Voltage readings are very low on the transformer test points (pins 5, 6, 7, 8)Charles, |
Re: Ofcom UK Foundation licence restriction IR 2028
#qcx
Thank you Hans
The QCX kits must attract so many into Amateur Radio (myself included), a perfect compliment to the Foundation Licence for all the obvious reasons. The way 7(2) is written implies there is some sort of IR 2028 accreditation, I assume there runs the hare. 73s Ted |
Re: QCX(-like) for 2m
#alignment
#vfo
Maybe this circuit can be modified for what your looking for ?
|
Re: Ofcom UK Foundation licence restriction IR 2028
#qcx
Clint Sharp
IR2028 Seems to me IR2028 means any commercial kit, correctly constructed, should meet the various EMC regulations (harmonics down at or below specified levels etc...) and that's about it, the bands and power limits are also listed but I'd say that's down to the discipline of the operator unless someone can provide me with concrete proof that it's illegal for anyone but a full licence holder to own a radio capable of operation at power levels and/or bands outside of what your licence class allows? So, I see no reason why it's wouldn't be fine for a FL holder to build a QCX kit if they are able to check or have it checked to prove it's working to spec (construction errors bite everyone occasionally)? On 11 July 2018 at 14:47, Hans Summers <hans.summers@...> wrote:
--
Clint. M0UAW IO83 No trees were harmed in the sending of this mail. However, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced. |
Re: U3s firware update
The basic difference between the two is that the 328P implements the
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
PicoPower standby modes, allowing longer battery life in situations where the processor is inactive most of the time. None of the QRP Labs kits use or need those modes, as the processor is always active when the radio is turned on. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:53 AM, Hans Summers <hans.summers@...> wrote:
Hi Al, Carl |