Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: QMX Electret Microphone specs
Here's how microphone sensitivity is measured:
?
A lower negative dB (such as -24dB) means more Volts out of the microphone for a given sound pressure
than a higher negative dB (such as -44dB).
?
The spec might use units of dB, dBA or dBV for the gain.
My guess is that these units are all directly comparable.
?
Mouser has a selection of 179 different electret microphones:
?
Selecting for only those with a sensitivity better than 30dB gives 11 microphones:
?
Three of those are not in stock, and two of the remaining expect a supply greater than 3 volts.
?
SNR is not given in the selection summary,? it is spelled out as "signal to noise" in the datasheets so search for "noise".
Of the remaining 6 microphones that have a sensitivity better than -30dB, the SNR is generally 60 or 70 db.
The two from PUI claim 77 and 80 dB of SNR, and are the most expensive at around $3.
?
If Hans really does use -24dB microphones with an 80dB SNR, those are not typical of what's on the market.
?
Jerry, KE7ER
? |
Re: QMX Electret Microphone specs
Mic Output levels... The -44 db Spec is due to the modern digital devices today, so that the Mic doesn't overdrive the?ADC/DAC, as used in most?modern SDRs, as well as SmartPhones/Tablet/Notebook PCs.??In other circuits (e.g. FM Modulators) it's usually not an issue.? That said a Mic with output of -44 db will drive an older ICOM analog (traditional heterodyne type SSB transceiver), to proper ALC levels with the Mic gain set near 50%. Then there is the difference in intended use of the?Mic and there are three types of Mics. 1) There are consumer Electret-Condenser Mics that have these output levels with the?mic at some distance to the?mouth.?? 2) A Close-Talk, Noise-Canceling, "communications grade" (e.g. Aviation Mics) that level is reached with the?Mic centered in front of your mouth with it set at 1/8" from your lips.? Then the acoustic noise cancelling?works, and the?output levels are maintained. 3) Now typical Studio Electret-Condenser?Mics?are yet different again with 48V "Phantom Power" (rather than 5V through a 4.7K ohm resistor for Mic BIAS).? This likely came from the AT&T networks that provided communications from the studio to the transmitter, but I'll confirm that with Dave, WJ6W he knows this stuff. Collins Radio set the?standards for Aviation radio interfaces, and those interfaces are still used today (.206" Mic plug to differentiate it from the .250" Headphone Plug) with a high impedance Dynamic Mic.? Today the modern general aviation radios all use Electret-Condenser Mics (600 to 2K Ohm Mics). The exception is a military helicopter headset where the Mic is typically a 5 Ohm Close-Talk, Noise-Canceling, Dynamic Mic due to the extreme noise levels they must contend with. Dave WI6R On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:33?AM Daniel Conklin via <danconklin2=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
--
|
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:23 AM, Mehmet Dinch wrote:
Adjusting mic gain to about 70 seems to improve the audio. However, every time I key up,? there is now an awful lot of noise before I even start speaking. Once I start speaking the audio is ok'ish with a load of background noise. Mehmet, the reason for this is described also on page QMX QMX_plus SSB settings (see Noise gate).
?
73 Ludwig |
Hello Mehmet and all,
?
if you need significant more than 55 dB audio gain the micro is not sensitive enough for QMX use. You will find something about this on page QMX QMX_plus SSB settings from QRP Labs Wiki.
?
73 Ludwig |
Updated Wiki Page: QMX QMX_plus SSB settings
#wiki-notice
Group Notification
The wiki page QMX QMX_plus SSB settings has been updated by @Ludwig_DH8WN <DH8WN@...>. |
Re: QMX Electret Microphone specs
Tony,
I know from working in the audio/video production industry that there are high quality and low quality electrets. Usually, but not always, you get what you pay for. Mine is a cheap Baofeng mic, however, After doing the gain adjustments, my input audio curves looked pretty close to the ones Hans provided.?
--
73, Dan - W2DLC |
QMX Electret Microphone specs
开云体育
I just did a bit of digging on electret specs. It seems that most of the ones I looked at had? sensitivities down around -44 db (volts/Pa) with SNRs in the neighborhood of 60db. But the one that Hans specified is much more sensitive at -24db with SNR around
80db. This leads me to believe that grabbing a random electret is likely to give disappointing results. There are some that specify the sensitivity as a positive number (52db for example). I would take this to mean -52db. Either that or they have specifies
SNR instead of sensitivity.
Anyway, I was surprised to find that the one used by Hans seems to be somewhat atypical based on my quick survey of electrets. Maybe I just looked in the wrong places?
73,
Tony
AD0VC
|
Mehmet,? I used the band configuration menus to move the band edges closer to the legal band edges, and then set the band center to 14.175.? Then set the mic levels carefully, then did calibration one page at a time using O. I managed to get nicer looking graphs that way. I'm not sure how to interpret them, but I also noticed PEP my output levels came up close to my tune levels at that point, and the audio seems to sound good.?
--
73, Dan - W2DLC |
Muhsin bey, selamlar :-)
?
Thanks for the tip. I'm using the electret capsule removed from other hand mics or other scrap pcb's. No LED's on any of these.
?
I wonder how significant it is that my plots are nothing like the examples in the documentation?
?
Another interesting observation:-
I set my QMX back to factory default and dialed in what I found to be workable and tested with dummy load (without calibration).
With my antenna plugged in (20m dipole, monoband, good SWR 1.2), on TX, the audio was badly distorted again. I also noticed that there was hardly any power going out. The power meter needle didn't even move.
?
Working through calibration again as I type this to try again...
?
Saygilar ve hormetler.
?
Mehmet (AKA Mel) M0KMD |
Ok thanks for the confirmation.
?
I only suspected a microcontroller switching fault is that the failure happened after first performing the SSB calibration into a dummy load then testing SWR with the terminal tools also into the same dummy load.
?
I didn't find any other hardware faults? in the receive chain during the repair. It's working fine now so I'll have to see how it holds up over time.
?
Thanks,
Greg
N1TR? |
Re: Debugging BS170-related issues
Hi Steve,
You can't measure many of the square waves created in this radio with a 100MHz scope, and expect them to look at all like a square wave. A square wave is comprised of odd harmonics of the fundamental frequency, at say, 30 MHz, your scope could see the fundamental, and the 3rd harmonic, but would be pretty blind to the 5th. Also, the usual 6 inch ground wire on the usual 100MHz probe will be adding in a whole lot of distortion to any signal you are measuring. As a good rule of thumb, your scope should have at least 10x the bandwidth of the non sinusoidal signal you wish to measure. Your probe's ground wire should be at most 1 inch long. -Chuck Harris, WA3UQV On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:12:32 -0700 "Steve N2IC via groups.io" <n2icarrl@...> wrote: Thanks, Stan, |
Stan,
I scoured my post for a personal attack, and could not find one. Motor wire is an exotic wire when used in a QRP radio kit. Compact, intermittent duty, motors quite often are built to withstand short term very hot operation... often thermally stressing even 200C rated wire. These kits are low temperature, low power radios, that come provisioned with a thermal stripping wire, equivalent to thermaleze. A large quantity (2x the total amount required) of the desired wire was included with each kit. Easily enough to cover the occasional oops an inexperienced builder may encounter. Your use of high temperature motor wire, to replace the wire that comes with these kits, makes your choice an outlier for the overwhelming majority of builders of these kits. It appears to me that its principal benefit is that *you* had it on hand. An inexperienced builder will find it challenging to use a knife to completely strip a #28AWG wire without damaging, or incompletely stripping, the wire. I find that most inexperienced craftsmen greatly over estimate the forces required to do fine operations. They also greatly underestimate the time required to do fine operations properly. Either can cause disappointing results. Sanding off wire insulation has its own difficulties. Most high temperature motor wire insulation is also designed to protect against abrasion... which is exactly what you are trying to do when you sand or scrape the insulation off of the wire. The insulation is almost always tougher than the copper wire itself, causing the side where you first break through to the copper to get sanded much more quickly than the rest of the wire. By the time your are done, the wire will be in the shape of a flat oval. If everyone was using, or could be reasonably expected to be using, high temperature, non-thermal stripping wire on their kits, then your advice would be spot on. I believe they are not, but are rather seeing the heat sinking effect of the large continuous ground planes needed for high quality RF work. Through the use of poor technique, or perhaps ineffective soldering equipment, they are not getting enough heat into the joint to melt (not burn) the usually easy to strip thermaleze style wire. A simple match, or a lighter, to pre-strip the wire will help with that job, and not put the wire at much risk. -Chuck Harris, WA3UQV On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:52:57 -0700 "Stan Dye via groups.io" <standye@...> wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 09:11 PM, Chuck Harris wrote:Please avoid using personal attacks, Chuck. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss