Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: QMX died pulling out headphones
The tape on the encoder was the first thing I looked at, but it's possible that a short occurred somewhere else as a result of the vibration of pushing the headphones in. I'll have to take a really close look at things and check the power rails with a meter when I can get to it.. I did notice that I hear a thump, thump when I pushed the left encoder button to try to turn it back on. That makes me think that the switching transistor is still OK.?
--
73, Dan - W2DLC |
Re: QMX died pulling out headphones
Hi Dan,
?
A similar thing happened to me.
You can read about it here: ?/g/QRPLabs/topic/107459127
Did you add the optional insulating tape on the encoder?
?
73, Mike KK7ER
? |
Hi Jim
Yes, QMX and QMX+ run the same firmware. Everything I say that applies to QMX applies to QMX+ and vice versa. The exceptions are: 1. QMX+ covers more bands than QMX. QMX+ has 160-6m 2. QMX+ has hardware RTC with CR2032 coin cell battery? 3. QMX+ has internal QLG3 GPS module 4. QMX+ has dev kit option (protoboard) 5. QMX+ has more IO pins exposed? 73 Hans G0UPL |
Re: Strange/Poor Power Performance QMX+
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi there. You should start with examining SWR bridge then trifilar transformer.. These are two CRUCIAL parts to get it working right. ? Of course I assume You did all the sweeps on dummy, but looking at your SWR sweeps, apparently something is not OK. You did not attached close pic of PCB so hard to tell but please compare your SWR and RF sweeps with my QMX ( They're similar in general, your 80m RF sweep looking exactly as mine LOL and nothing we can do with it ) ? BTW, I was 200% sure I did not made any mistake, pffff, I am working with RF daily and such things are POC, but we are human. Errare humanum est ;-) ? If anything drop me a line. ? 73 Greg SP3RNZ ? ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of groups.3dxvx via groups.io ? Hello, ? I recently bought a QMX+ and had a lot of fun building it and using it so far, but, my biggest problem is the inconsistency of power over the bands. I've tried quite a bit of stuff suggested (re soldering, touching up the joints, verifying continuity, etc.) but I am now out of ideas on what to do. I've attached photos of my RF filter sweeps, SWR sweeps, LPF sweeps, and I/Q sweeps. I am out of ideas on what to do and just want to make sure I am getting the most out the device. ? Also I am sorry if I am heading in the wrong direction with this, I am new to the hobby. ? Current RF power: 6m -> 0.9W, 1.43SWR 10m -> 1.8W, 1.22SWR 12m -> 3.0W, 1.18SWR 15m -> 3.3W, 1.12SWR 17m -> 2.3W, 1.15SWR 20m -> 3.1W, 1.10SWR 30m -> 4.4W, 1.07SWR 40m -> 4.1W, 1.04SWR 60m -> 4.4W, 1.05SWR 80m -> 5.4W, 1.05SWR 160m -> 6.0W, 1.04SWR ? ? |
Set bridges for HF Sine Wave signal generator on the relay board
Hello
I have looked at and read the assembly instructions for the relay board and also for the signal generator.
I also studied the article AN006 HF sine wave signal generator but nowhere did I find how to set the wire jumpers on the relay board. ?
Many Thanks Bernd DL3BLA |
QSL all, Hans !
BTW, my QMX-PLUS arrives today but I'm going out of town for a few days ! Will let you know how it does upon my return ! 72, Bill, N4QA/QRP BTW, my photo is that of granddaddy's ( William Lutie Mabry )barn which he built as a young man some 80 years ago on Mabry Lane in Blacksburg, VA USA with the help of my dad, Melvin Gerald Mabry ( W4MAI, SK 2006 ). I "helped" them throw hay into the barn loft when I was about 5 years old ! |
QMX+: The easiest and funniest of all the QRP-Labs transceiver kits
TL;DR: if you are unsure about whether you should give a go to building
a QMX+ kit, then just go ahead and get one to build. It is easy, and it is a lot of fun. Longer version below. Yes, you must believe the title: the QMX+ is really the easiest of all the QRP-Labs transceiver kits. The build is probably second in difficulty only to the 20W dummy load kit, but that does not count a transceiver proper, right? HI. I have built 2 QCX mini, 3 QMX, this QMX+ (no digi stuff here, so no QDX in my shack, sorry :P), two semi-home-brew versions of the usdx in the design by Barb WB2CBA, which are kinda in the same family of the QCX, on top of several other kits from a variety of other suppliers. All these kits have been a joy to build, including my first QMX Rev.1, serial # around 100, one of those which had the short in the 5V SMPS, which required some throrough testing and a little surgery HI. The QMX can indeed be slightly tricky to build as the PCB is quite packed. But boy, the QMX+ is on a totally different level of easyness. No special space constraints. No tight mechanical fits (the postponed soldering of the two right pins of the tune encoder is really a minor one, and was solved brilliantly by Hans). No fear of ripping off some other SMD components while soldering. Well, I have used my 2.5mm scalpel tip to solder all the QMX kits, without issues, but for the QMX+ you can easily get on with a 5mm one, no joking. The only thing that requires some care, really, is the placement of connectors at the back of the PCB, as the holes in the real panel are snug and you really need to get the connectors as straigt as possible. And that's totally straightforward to do, by soldering only one of the pins of each connector and then making sure that the connector sits straight before soldering the other ones. But for the rest, there is really no sticky point at all, and it is much easier to get around it than in the QMX, where the space is really tight. The amount of soldering required is not massive by any standard, and relatively little compared to the QCX mini and the QMX. The stuff to solder is well spaced-apart. The pervasive use of 0.33mm enameled wire eliminated almost entirely the potential issues with remaining enamel and/or imperfect joints. There are literally too few things that can go wrong during such a build. The worst that can happen is that your cat jumps on the lab desk splattering all the caps you have just sorted up all over the place. Don't ask me how I know, OK? HI I mean, if you can read the assembly manual, and you know which side of the soldering iron to grab, and you are the average human being who considers winding toroids as one of the most gratifying and relaxing past-times on Earth (me! me!), then the QMX+ build is literally a piece of cake. Almost too easy, and definitely uneventful. It's just amazing for such a powerful rig. I completed the build in a few hours, perhaps 5 in total over two days, without rushing through it. About one third of the time was spent winding toroids (me! me!). And when I was done with my final checks and dared applying power, all I got was a fantastic rig, ready to operate immediately on 12 bands. I spent about 20 minutes in the serial console after the first boot, checking all the sweeps. They were all almost exactly as expected. I tinkered with the 20-17-15 LPF for about 10 minutes, trying to squeeze some more power on 20m, but then I realised that it made totally no sense and stopped straight away. In hindsight, I should have used that time to make a QSO :) I have been using the rig for a few days, and it is just great. But that's another story. This was just to say that building a QMX+ from a kit is dead easy, and fun. 72/73 de Enzo M0KTZ DISCLAIMER: This post reflects my own personal opinions, which cannot be ascribed to anyone else, including in particular any club or association to which I belong or to which I am connected. I have no vested interest in any of the QRP-Labs business. I have no business or personal relation whatsoever with Hans Summers or with QRP-Labs. All the kits I have built have been paid by me and by noone else, but please don't tell my XYL how many are they: that's our little secret! I have met Hans once, we had a very interesting chat and we have exchanged emails on several subjects, but never on the easyness of building a QMX+ :P My opinion is obviously biased by the fact that I have a sincere appreciation for the QRP-Labs stuff that I have built and used so far. I trust you can live with that ;) -- |
Hello John
I don't know exactly what FT817 does. But generally speaking: Envelope peaks of a transmission (PEP: Peak Envelope Power) are much higher than the average. If the PEP is 5W, then perhaps the average power is around 0.5W. If this average-power-relative-to-PEP can be increased, the signal can be made to punch through the noise much better, giving the signal greater range (or ability to handle worse conditions). Audio processing aims to compress the dynamic range, which increases the average power. Too much processing sounds unnatural or even distorted. So it should arguably be used in moderation (like most enjoyable things).? But no matter what else you do, the actual process of modulation to SSB intrinsically is likely to?produce?RF envelope overshoot. When the RF envelope overshoots it will cause clipping, which causes splatter due to over-driving the power amplifier: RF in adjacent channels which will offend other SSB users off-channel. Normally a manufacturer must want to avoid such an occurrence?so ALC (Automatic Level Control) in the transmitter will reduce the gain to prevent this.? BUT - another way is CESSB, which is a way of controlling the RF envelope such that the overshoots are eliminated, without increasing distortion. It is found to almost double the average SSB power compared to a very good, well implemented ALC. Perhaps more... I think when combined with speech processing the advantages increase, and it's more like 4dB according to my measurements here.? This article: "Double your SSB TX power with CESSB" is good and has links to YouTube videos too, it's a good explanation.? An explanation centered,? however, around Flex Radio; the conclusion is: In short, with the FlexRadio 6xxx Signature Series transceiver you are paying for 100 watts but getting the ¡°SSB power¡± of a close to 200 watts transceiver!? But that's Flex... $$$$$...? Compared to a more average transceiver, I think switching on CESSB is like getting the equivalent of 12.5W for your real 5W. And - to re-iterate - all this is only a forthcoming FIRMWARE update to QMX+, and a QMX+? kit including enclosure gives 160-6m coverage and is a mere $150? :-)? ?Even though I do have to say so myself: I LOVE QMX+ 73 Hans G0UPL |