Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: Intermittent Dit on QMX
Jim: I'm trying to increase my CW speed, but I've fallen behind a little because of the T41 project. That said, using the Farnsworth method just proves that the way I learned Morse code for my Novice license back in 1953 was wrong! Counting dits and dahs will make any speed above 20wpm very difficult. Listening for patterns, or rhythms, is the way to go. I like the program by G4FON which has many options, including setting the Farnsworth spacing. W1AW uses Farnsworth for its practice sessions at speeds under 18wpm. If you're trying to learn Morse, give the G4FON software a shot. It's free and quite good. Try starting at 25wpm with 10wpm spacing. Being able to copy 25wpm probably covers most CW operators. Jack, W8TEE
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 09:52:15 AM EDT, Jim Strohm <jim.strohm@...> wrote:
Farnsworth! I'm in a Morse?class right now, and we're learning characters at 25 WPM timing, and 5 WPM spacing.? That timing is a little bewildering to me, because I learned code 30 years ago at 20 WPM timing / 5 WPM spacing for my Novice exam and was at 15 / 15 sending and receiving on-air at my best back then.? I'm a little limited now by having only straight keys (SKs) here, so my next buy/build project will likely be a paddle key. ? But I'm trying!? Learning to send left-handed will be the hardest part for?me. Occasionally I used to get compliments on my CW proficiency at 15 / 10, especially?when people learned I was?SK-ing it.? I think taking band in high school helped. If you're truly desperate, you can get a code sender / reader and pick a Farnsworth?timing you like.? Eventually you'll pick up code well enough to read it in your head and send it with an SK. ? Almost everybody can learn code and get proficient.? It's easier than most of us seem to think.? Even kids can learn it, once they know their alphabet well enough to read Dr. Seuss.? My oldest daughter could read that well before she was 3. 73 Jim N6OTQ On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 7:02?AM K9NUD-Steve <k9nud@...> wrote: Albert, good on you for using the QRP Labs rigs for this. I suggested as much a couple of days ago in a LICW post where the OP was asking for ideas for a code oscillator. Why bother when you can build an entire rig for $55 and get a great practice oscillator in the bargain? I saw some weirdness early on with my QMX keyer, but not since, and I don't recall specifically what it was. |
||
Re: Best ways to measure output power w/ an o'scope and access ground
Dave Morris that looks a good instrument ?I expect you have the manual but just in case (and because it could be of wider interest to others): The circuit info is there, and uses ¡°established methods¡± quite frequently recreated in homebrew form too (with calibration and meter scale issues that not everyone would relish) ?
|
||
Re: Intermittent Dit on QMX
Farnsworth! I'm in a Morse?class right now, and we're learning characters at 25 WPM timing, and 5 WPM spacing.? That timing is a little bewildering to me, because I learned code 30 years ago at 20 WPM timing / 5 WPM spacing for my Novice exam and was at 15 / 15 sending and receiving on-air at my best back then.? I'm a little limited now by having only straight keys (SKs) here, so my next buy/build project will likely be a paddle key. ? But I'm trying!? Learning to send left-handed will be the hardest part for?me. Occasionally I used to get compliments on my CW proficiency at 15 / 10, especially?when people learned I was?SK-ing it.? I think taking band in high school helped. If you're truly desperate, you can get a code sender / reader and pick a Farnsworth?timing you like.? Eventually you'll pick up code well enough to read it in your head and send it with an SK. ? Almost everybody can learn code and get proficient.? It's easier than most of us seem to think.? Even kids can learn it, once they know their alphabet well enough to read Dr. Seuss.? My oldest daughter could read that well before she was 3. 73 Jim N6OTQ On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 7:02?AM K9NUD-Steve <k9nud@...> wrote: Albert, good on you for using the QRP Labs rigs for this. I suggested as much a couple of days ago in a LICW post where the OP was asking for ideas for a code oscillator. Why bother when you can build an entire rig for $55 and get a great practice oscillator in the bargain? I saw some weirdness early on with my QMX keyer, but not since, and I don't recall specifically what it was. |
||
Re: #qmx Antenna Tuner Can Kill PAs
#qmx
Ted
I'll second the use of an absorptive bridge - about no contact with high mismatch that way.
Just don't go and leave it in the "tune" position and wonder why the replies are very few and spaced out so.? ?From experience, I'm afraid - QRPp by accident. Ted K3RTA? |
||
Re: QDX transmit troubleshooting advice¡
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, at 07:12 AM, Jerry wrote:
Jerry, The diodes in the QMX schematic are Zeners, NOT 1n4148.? Also, the single 1n4148 for the QDX protection is across L14, the RF choke that feeds power to the finals.? My simulations have shown that the Zeners OR the commutating diode across L14 are good choices.? You do not need both.? The simpler solution is John's commutating diode.? The commutating diode could be a 1n4148.? I have only bench-tested the commutating diode. 73 Evan AC9TU |
||
Re: #qmx Antenna Tuner Can Kill PAs
#qmx
John Z
Thanks for your response. Looks like steady state SWR of 3 will heat the BS170s to their PD limit, so I assume?SWR <2 is OK. Transients from an auto tuner that can be as high as SWR of 10 will cause transient power dissipation significantly higher than the allowable dissipation.? Unfortunately we don't have sufficient thermal data on the BS170 to understand transient thermal response at the silicon chip in order to determine allowable SWR Transient time product.?? Bottom line is?Don't?Use an Auto Tuner without reducing the transient at the QMX.? Reduced power or attenuation between QMX and tuner.? ? |
||
Re: #qmx Antenna Tuner Can Kill PAs
#qmx
Matched antenna sounds good, but I (and a lot of others) use temporary antennas in portable settings. I just activated in a national park yesterday and there was no way to put up a matched antenna. Even if you have a 'matched' antenna in one place, who knows what it'll be like at another. And even if it's perfectly matched in a fixed location, what about the day one end falls down the night before?
So I still think a manual tuner with an absorptive bridge you can switch in/out is the way to go unless the radio has SWR protection built in. (QMX down the road?) That will take care or whatever the mechanism is for finals failure in QxX radios. ATUs just seem to be a good way to fry the finals.? -- 73, Dan? NM3A |
||
Re: QDX transmit troubleshooting advice¡
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, at 02:12 AM, John Farmer VK7JB wrote:
Hi Kirk and Evan,John, If you decide to test IC5, I would strongly suggest that you remove the BS170s and reduce the supplied voltage to 7 volts.? While trying to do that diagnostic, I destroyed the processor on a failed QDX that I got from another Ham.? I did not remove the BS170s when I should have.? The safe route is to remove all 4 BS170s and replace IC5, then do the IC5 testing.? After removing the BS170s, you can verify that IC5 works as expected (0 volts on the BS170 gates when receiving and 5 volts square wave-2.5 volts measured with DMM).? Also, limit the current supplied to 200ma if you have a current limiting supply.? Without the BS170s, the QDX will not need a lot of current. Suggestions from experience ;-) 73 Evan AC9TU |
||
Re: QDX transmit troubleshooting advice¡
"I have just added 1N4148 diodes as in the QMX schematic."
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Wut? JZ On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 8:13?AM Jerry <Jerryh47@...> wrote:
|
||
Re: QDX transmit troubleshooting advice¡
Which Final FET Fails?
My high band QDX also failed once, also Q9. ?? Both are built as 9 volt version, power is via a linear LM317 regulator with 1 amp current limiting. I have just added 1N4148 diodes as in the QMX schematic.? |
||
Re: Intermittent Dit on QMX
Albert, good on you for using the QRP Labs rigs for this. I suggested as much a couple of days ago in a LICW post where the OP was asking for ideas for a code oscillator. Why bother when you can build an entire rig for $55 and get a great practice oscillator in the bargain? I saw some weirdness early on with my QMX keyer, but not since, and I don't recall specifically what it was.
Regarding speed, though, I'd recommend trying to practice at 20 WPM. If you get good at 12, you will eventually hit the wall trying to get past it since slower speeds allow you to count dits and dahs, whereas 20WPM forces you to learn the rhythm of the characters, and eventually words. Just leave lots of spacing early on, and you'll start locking in the characters. It might seem impossible, but stepping from slower to faster speeds is actually far more difficult. |
||
Re: Q: Destructive experiment on a dead BS170
That'll work. Jim On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 6:24?AM Ted via <k3rta=[email protected]> wrote: Funny you should ask.? My lab used to weight filters after sampling for total suspended particulates in the air, years ago before contracting that stuff out. |
||
How much toroid compression for 5 watts out on 20 meters for the QMX?
To answer my own question I bought another QMX kit and built it with the yellow L513 toroid wound as shown below. Of course this time around all the capacitors are in the right spots too. Result: with 12.0 volts applied an 5 honest watts is produced on 80, 60, 40, and 20 meters. Oddly only 30 meters is the outlier at 4.2 watts. What did you say? Am I going buy another QMX and wind the transformer twisty style? Uh, no :) 73, Sandy KB3EOF
|
||
Re: Q: Destructive experiment on a dead BS170
Ted
Funny you should ask.? My lab used to weight filters after sampling for total suspended particulates in the air, years ago before contracting that stuff out. That's a U.S. penny and the Mint says that should be 2.50 grams....? The scale hasn't been calibrated in years though we still have a weight set around here someplace. It'd do OK for before & after. |