¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: #qmx Power not staying on after Q103-Q104 fix #qmx

 

Just to confirm that the rig works like a charm. Have had a few QSOs already on 80m-40m-30m. Re-stating the obvious here: it's a fantastic little rig. It gives 4W solid on all bands with 12V (slightly less on 20m, hardly noticeable), super-hot RX, good keyer, all details to high standards, as expected from Hans HI.? Thumbs up.

Will probably try the super-weird transformer on the next one. Wondering whether anybody has started experimenting with higher bands already ;-)

72/73 de Enzo M0KTZ


Re: Vacuum-tube final for QRP transmitters?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I originally got the idea from an SWL (later GM8BAR) with whom I went on DXxpedition as GC3PAI/A and ON5YB in the 1960s. He had built a receiver which could best be described as the transistor equivalent of the G2DAF.?

It performed very well but he was not entirely satisfied with the performance and was talking of replacing the front end with something based on Nuvistors, but ended up emigrating to Australia. He did not get as far as looking at low power PAs.

73 John F5VLF

On 13 Sep 2023, at 22:33, ian007 via <ian007@...> wrote:

The plate voltage would still need to be like 90V-200V. Don't let the allure of $5 tube fool you, unless you already have a fairly expensive high-voltage power supply lying around looking for use.?


Re: QDX transmit troubleshooting advice¡­

 

Hi Kirk and Evan,

I¡¯ve ordered some replacement IC5¡¯s and am waiting for them to arrive down under. ?This weekend, I¡¯ll put the oscilloscope onto the gates of the BS120s while the old IC5 is still in place and see what I find. ?I¡¯ll also see if the high current state persists with the (probably) damaged IC5 in place. ?I didn¡¯t notice IC2 getting hot. ?I¡¯d better check that¡¯s still doing its job.

73,
John
VK7JB


Re: USB DEVICE NOT Recognized!

 

On 14/09/2023 00:05, Howard Lamhut wrote:
I¡¯ve been trying to get my QMX To come up as a USB device on my computer.
Howard,

As you have found the QMX is like the QDX, with Windows it does not behave as other USB devices.
It will only enumerate once, then it has to have a power cycle.
Hans is aware of this but he uses Linux and does not know the answer.

73 Alan G4ZFQ


Re: #qmx Antenna Tuner Can Kill PAs #qmx

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The BS170 are producing a signal that approximates to a square wave - the fundamental with a lot of energy in harmonics, 30% or so. These harmonics are all removed in the transformer and the LPF to leave a nice clean sine wave.? For a 5W output about 2 W will need to be removed.

Could it be that some of that is removed in the transformer causing it to get warm? The LPF may also be getting warm.

Connecting two of the transformers back to back and measuring the gain using a NanoVNA could show what the losses are.

Chris, G5CTH

On 14/09/2023 05:17, Stephan Ahonen KE0WVA wrote:

Martin DK3UW: It T 501 produces a substantial amount of heat wouldn't that mean big losses there ? How could that be adressed?
The new winding style for T501 in the current version of the assembly manual promises tighter coupling between the primary and secondary windings, which might put less power through the ferrite and cause less heating... I am going to try rewinding my T501 and see what effect it has.
Ted 2E0THH: How are you quantifying that, significant to what?
It's easily the brightest object in the entire QMX on my thermal camera. The thermal camera says it's about 60C, but I don't necessarily trust the thermal camera to be totally accurate. I will try digging out the thermocouple that came with my multimeter and seeing what that says.

I applied a digital probe (i.e. I poked it with my finger) and came back with a reading of "it's pretty hot, but not like, ow-hot."

At any rate the transformer is definitely hotter than the BS170s, which don't shine particularly much on the thermal camera at all. Of course this is into a perfect 50 ohms of dummy load, so mileage may vary at higher SWR.
Ted: demonstrate [with a thermal camera] that heat is NOT transferring to the bottom plane because the copper heat sink surface is in the way

Well, firstly, I'm not saying that no heat is being transferred. But it's basic physics that adding another interface in the middle is going to increase thermal impedance. Especially since I don't see any thermal compound, and those surfaces don't look lapped, so the amount of actual surface area for heat transfer is going to be pretty low.

Remember that air is an insulator. If this seems weird to you, ask yourself why we use foam to insulate things. The way that foam insulates things is by trapping a bunch of air in a way that it can't move heat via convection. Without convection, and because air sucks at conduction, the foam insulates. The only reason we even bother trying to conduct heat away via the air is because we don't have another way to do it, and we make up for it by adding more surface area to our heat sinks using fins, and adding fans to increase convection.

So what this means is that if you're not using thermal compound to fill in the gaps, or lapping the surfaces to eliminate the gaps in the first place, you're gonna have air between your surfaces. What you've done is place insulation between your heat source and your heat sink.

Are we to suppose that this copper tracing that's blocked on one side, far thinner than the added copper heat sink, and, nestled underneath another heat source, is MORE effective at removing BS170 heat than is a thicker sheet of copper added to that same original plan?

When you assembled your QMX, did you notice that soldering anything connected to ground was vastly more difficult than soldering anything else? The ground plane is an excellent conductor and spreader of heat. Yes, most of it is buried under layers of FR4 and glue. But that's more than made up for in surface area.

The thickness of the copper is not the important part. The thing that moves heat is surface area. This is why heat sinks have fins. More surface area moves more heat, a thick copper bracket with 20mm^2 of surface area is moving less heat than a thin ground plane with nearly 6000mm^2 of surface area. The thermal impedance of the ground plane to the air could be 100 times worse than from that copper bracket to the air, and still dissipate three times as much heat.
ajparent1/kb1gm: Where does the heat get radiated or conducted to?
The air inside the case, then conducted to the case itself, then conducted from there into the environment. I would expect temperatures inside the case to be several degrees above ambient. But we're not dealing with?that much heat relative to the surface area of the enclosure.

A pretty good amount of the heat in the ground plane is probably conducted to the case and the coax shield via the BNC connector.



Re: #qmx Antenna Tuner Can Kill PAs #qmx

 

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:07 AM, Hans Summers wrote:
Overall I think there may have been a recent trend on this forum, for a lot of theoretical speculation about possible problems, which are in general not backed up by observational evidence.
Are you suggesting that a bunch of nerds would waste their time and energy theorycrafting about irrelevant technical details? I have never heard of such a thing!


Re: #qmx Antenna Tuner Can Kill PAs #qmx

 

Martin DK3UW: It T 501 produces a substantial amount of heat wouldn't that mean big losses there ? How could that be adressed?
The new winding style for T501 in the current version of the assembly manual promises tighter coupling between the primary and secondary windings, which might put less power through the ferrite and cause less heating... I am going to try rewinding my T501 and see what effect it has.
Ted 2E0THH: How are you quantifying that, significant to what?
It's easily the brightest object in the entire QMX on my thermal camera. The thermal camera says it's about 60C, but I don't necessarily trust the thermal camera to be totally accurate. I will try digging out the thermocouple that came with my multimeter and seeing what that says.

I applied a digital probe (i.e. I poked it with my finger) and came back with a reading of "it's pretty hot, but not like, ow-hot."

At any rate the transformer is definitely hotter than the BS170s, which don't shine particularly much on the thermal camera at all. Of course this is into a perfect 50 ohms of dummy load, so mileage may vary at higher SWR.
Ted: demonstrate [with a thermal camera] that heat is NOT transferring to the bottom plane because the copper heat sink surface is in the way

Well, firstly, I'm not saying that no heat is being transferred. But it's basic physics that adding another interface in the middle is going to increase thermal impedance. Especially since I don't see any thermal compound, and those surfaces don't look lapped, so the amount of actual surface area for heat transfer is going to be pretty low.

Remember that air is an insulator. If this seems weird to you, ask yourself why we use foam to insulate things. The way that foam insulates things is by trapping a bunch of air in a way that it can't move heat via convection. Without convection, and because air sucks at conduction, the foam insulates. The only reason we even bother trying to conduct heat away via the air is because we don't have another way to do it, and we make up for it by adding more surface area to our heat sinks using fins, and adding fans to increase convection.

So what this means is that if you're not using thermal compound to fill in the gaps, or lapping the surfaces to eliminate the gaps in the first place, you're gonna have air between your surfaces. What you've done is place insulation between your heat source and your heat sink.

Are we to suppose that this copper tracing that's blocked on one side, far thinner than the added copper heat sink, and, nestled underneath another heat source, is MORE effective at removing BS170 heat than is a thicker sheet of copper added to that same original plan?

When you assembled your QMX, did you notice that soldering anything connected to ground was vastly more difficult than soldering anything else? The ground plane is an excellent conductor and spreader of heat. Yes, most of it is buried under layers of FR4 and glue. But that's more than made up for in surface area.

The thickness of the copper is not the important part. The thing that moves heat is surface area. This is why heat sinks have fins. More surface area moves more heat, a thick copper bracket with 20mm^2 of surface area is moving less heat than a thin ground plane with nearly 6000mm^2 of surface area. The thermal impedance of the ground plane to the air could be 100 times worse than from that copper bracket to the air, and still dissipate three times as much heat.
ajparent1/kb1gm: Where does the heat get radiated or conducted to?
The air inside the case, then conducted to the case itself, then conducted from there into the environment. I would expect temperatures inside the case to be several degrees above ambient. But we're not dealing with?that much heat relative to the surface area of the enclosure.

A pretty good amount of the heat in the ground plane is probably conducted to the case and the coax shield via the BNC connector.


Re: USB DEVICE NOT Recognized!

 

Hello Cliff hopefully I¡¯m replying to the right one here you had the only correct answer that worked ?for me I thank you thank you thank you from the bottom of my heart I jumped ?through flaming hoops and simply turning the QMX on last after everything else was up and running was the magic bullet
n2hhh


Re: FedEx invoice for import to UK

 

I HAVE one of Joe's rolling ball clocks !!
The woodworking is meticulous, so everything
just 'clicks' -- like a clock

w2jc

On 13 Sep 2023 at 18:50, Hans Summers wrote:


Wow, that IS unreasonably cool and awesome!


Re: USB DEVICE NOT Recognized!

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Martin,

Every time I've gotten that message there was no Com port defined for the radio. I don't see how it worked for you if it was the same message.

73,
Cliff, AE5ZA



On Sep 13, 2023, at 20:01, Martin K0MJ <oakwoodfarm@...> wrote:

I put my QMX through it's paces during a POTA activation last weekend using a windows 10 machine.? I got the same message every time I connected the QMX to the computer (either plugging it in or turning the QMX on after it was plugged in but off.? Despite the concerning message, I believe it is normal.? I just ignored the message, opened WSJTX and it worked flawlessly in digital modes.? ?Good luck.


Re: USB DEVICE NOT Recognized!

 

In order to do digital communications you have to be able to have the QMX talk to the computer so we can see the software so that you can receive and transmit digital modes without the ability to do that it¡¯s just any old radio without the ability to talk to the computer and do the different digital modes this radio is capable of.


Re: Q: Destructive experiment on a dead BS170

 

In lieu of a vertical mill you could use a file, though controlling the depth would be difficult.

Or a drill press with an end mill chucked into it.

Unfortunately I have neither.


Re: Vacuum-tube final for QRP transmitters?

 

The plate voltage would still need to be like 90V-200V. Don't let the allure of $5 tube fool you, unless you already have a fairly expensive high-voltage power supply lying around looking for use.?


Re: USB DEVICE NOT Recognized!

 

Hi Martin,

How did you set up your WSJTX settings,? did you adjust to 80% as Hans has suggested?

Any idea of watts out and how warm did the QMX get?

I'm prepping to do a SOTA on 2 peaks in Idaho next summer and I will be the first to activate them and I want to make a ton of contacts on CW, FT8 and hopefully SSB!!

John

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 7:53 PM Martin K0MJ <oakwoodfarm@...> wrote:
I put my QMX through it's paces during a POTA activation last weekend using a windows 10 machine.? I got the same message every time I connected the QMX to the computer (either plugging it in or turning the QMX on after it was plugged in but off.? Despite the concerning message, I believe it is normal.? I just ignored the message, opened WSJTX and it worked flawlessly in digital modes.? ?Good luck.


Re: USB DEVICE NOT Recognized!

 

I put my QMX through it's paces during a POTA activation last weekend using a windows 10 machine.? I got the same message every time I connected the QMX to the computer (either plugging it in or turning the QMX on after it was plugged in but off.? Despite the concerning message, I believe it is normal.? I just ignored the message, opened WSJTX and it worked flawlessly in digital modes.? ?Good luck.


Re: USB DEVICE NOT Recognized!

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Windows 10 often does that if you have the QMX on when you plug in the usb cable. Try turning it off and then plug in the USB cable. Wait a bit for Windows to get it's act together the power on the QMX. It'll likely find it then and give it a port.

73,
Cliff, AE5ZA



On Sep 13, 2023, at 19:05, Howard Lamhut <Howardlam@...> wrote:

<50040412-A147-482C-8C3D-9087E267A0E4.jpeg>


Hello everyone.

I¡¯ve been trying to get my QMX To come up as a USB device on my computer.
it comes up with the message that I copied off my screen that I attached to this post.
(USB device not recognized)
to start off I had what appears to be a fully successful build.
it receives and transmits on every band at approximately 4.6 watts out on 12 volts
I had no issue installing the firmware.
As a matter of fact I reinstall the firmware with the hopes to resolve this issue.
I am running windows 10.
i¡¯m using a brand new cable designed for data transmission.
I tried updating the USB drivers on my computer and I have the latest drivers.

I¡¯ve tried rebooting the computer.
i¡¯ve tried connecting the USB A connector to different ports on the computer.
I ?touched up the USB connector on the pcb to see if that would rectify this issue.
I very carefully checked all the contacts with a 10 Power Russian Loop to make sure that my soldering was perfectly clean with no Bridges.
Short of simply trying a different computer I¡¯m running out of ideas.?



Re: Vacuum-tube final for QRP transmitters?

 

Nuvistors are interesting!? I had two of them in a 2 meter rx preamp back in the late 60's.? The tubes are still available, the sockets not so much.? Least expensive 5 pin socket I found just now was about $9 if you buy 10 of them ($90).? I can deal with a 6C4 much easier now.
73!? Mark K9TR


Re: #qmx Antenna Tuner Can Kill PAs #qmx

 

Andy,
Sounds good, but we already had one failure reported switching from 6 to 12V instantaneously. I'd rather rather stick with my 4SQRP tuner. No finals failures yet on 7 QRP Labs rigs in 5 years. (Knock, knock.)
--
73, Dan? NM3A


Re: QDX PA modification with 2x IRF510

 

Lee,

one point of clarification: The QCX is class E, the QDX and QMX are class D. ?All are relying on digital type of response from the finals.?


73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: USB DEVICE NOT Recognized!

 

If you can install firmware and reinstall firmware then it is was
acting as a USB device. The ONLY time the QMX will act as a USB device
is during installation of firmware and that seems to work fine for
you. What am I missing?

-mike/w1mt