Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: QMX+ build: so close, and yet....
Hi Michael,
?
that’s great that it is alive. ?Congratulations on that part.
?
look at all of your soldered joints under magnification and a bright light. ?Look especially at T501, the output transformer. ?If you didn’t scrape the enamel off the wire and solder those well it would exhibit this problem. ?The same for L502. ?Remember that the rig will work correctly if all parts are in the right place and soldered well. ?It’s rare that a part is defective.?
good luck
?
--
73 Jeff Moore W1NC |
Re: Using .33mm/AWG#28 for everything in the QMX+?
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 03:37 PM, Joe Lokaj wrote:
Yes, the only exeption I remember are the single turn coils in the T507. Eveything else seams to be in .33mm wire.
Good luck,
Luis
CU2IJ |
Re: #QMX IC402 issue in combination with 50W PA?
#qmx
Hi Stan,
?
thanks for your comment.
I do have a newer revision with D516 already installed as SMD.
?
?
KR
?
Dirk |
Re: Broken STM32 pin to LCD
Hello James ?
I have some ideas I wanted to try but I consider them "stretch goals" and so so far out that I don't want to put them on paper (or electronic equivalent) until I am way past much higher priority things and until I have experimented a lot and know what's possible; so perhaps nothing may ever come that requires 8-bit mode, perhaps it may, I don't know yet.? The other thing is speed, it takes twice as many write operations to transfer the data in 4-bit mode compared to 8-bit mode. Right now there is nothing that requires higher speed but the 8-bit write mode does make things faster overall and something may benefit from that in future.? 73 Hans G0UPL |
Re: QMX+ PA Voltage marginally low
Hello Trevor Marginally low PA voltage is not considered a problem. It's acceptable. There's device to device variation. In the future?I will include in the firmware a calibration function that can measure and adjust for device variations in the PA modulator.? 73 Hans G0UPL On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 6:16?PM Trevor Shackleton via <trevorshackleton=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Production seems to have slowed significantly
Hi Ian, all > Why such a slow down? According to my records for the last 6 months, there has not been a significant slow-down. Remember September isn't over yet. September production was certainly?lower than July/August. Reminder, the waiting list is updated daily here:? The table below shows September up until 25-Sep-2024 so it is an incomplete month. The table shows the number of new assembled kit orders, and number of orders shipped. Note that this is the number of orders, not the number of kits (some orders are for more than one assembled radio, so the number of assembled radios per month is higher than what is indicated here).? Month? ? ? ?New? ?Shipped -----? ? ? ?---? ? ? ?--- March? ? ? ?170? ? ? ?252 April? ? ? ?153? ? ? ?210 May? ? ? ? ?236? ? ? ?154 June? ? ? ? 185? ? ? ?177 July? ? ? ? 157? ? ? ?286 August? ? ? 140? ? ? ?250 September? ? 93? ? ? ?124 Of course there is some month to month variation, there are a lot of factors involved. Factors include (but are not limited to):?
Generally it's hard to size a team; one cannot hire and fire on a whim; there are of course human factors, also legal ones (labor law), financial, time to train people, blah blah. So there's always going to be some ebb and flow in the waiting list size and production rate.? I'm also attaching the chart of waiting list length since we started producing Assembled radios as well as kits, which was November 2018. At the end of last year we peaked at 906 waiting orders for assembled radios. Right now the waiting list is 542 orders, which is the lowest it's been in 16 months, since before the QMX launch at Dayton last year in May 2023. 73 Hans G0UPL On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 6:17?PM Ian - VE3RIM via <madgoat=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: #qmx
#qmx
Number sent.?
i think your build looks great. From what i saw yesterday i figure you’ll be able to tweak better results than me. Your Bpf should also be squeezable. If you look at mine the windings are very close. The peak for 80 40 and 60 is shared so right now on yours forty gets the cake and 60 is a little down (not much) ?80 is a compromise. If you like where mine is you could simply start by squeezing turns on your Bpf ?inductor and r re sweeping. Also keep in mind your use. 40 is a work horse. 60m one you use a lot??? Etc. but I think you wound ?the most configurable way where I took a chance and wound mine the way I did so it would stay consistent. It’s not moving around. Chat more on the phone. I have to get back to sleep.? |
Re: Still no output on QMX
The high-band powers look like you wound the transformer for 9V but are running with 12V. On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:59?PM James via <jmrobertsjmr=[email protected]> wrote:
|
QMX+ build: so close, and yet....
First, the good news: IT'S ALIVE. It accepts power, it does not catch fire, and all the controls work and pass diagnostics. The bad news: it does not pass transmit diagnostics, and all the different sweeps are wrong. Attached is a (mercifully short) recording of the diagnostics screen including transmission into a dummy load.? The most obvious problem is: wattage is 0!? I'm using a buck-boost that's got the voltage at 12 (this is a 12-volt build). Idle draw is 0.115A. Draw when attempting to transmit during the diagnostic is 0.255, which seems low. Obviously, some kind of rework will be necessary. What's my most likely culprit to start with? Thank you all! Michael WD0OM |
Re: Still no output on QMX
Hi Ludwig, I have some output numbers for you.
?
60M-<.5W
40M-<.5W
30M-<.2W
20M-9.9W
17M-8.4W
15M-5.5W
?
Do you have an idea why there's very little output om 60M-30M and too much on 20M & 17M?
?
Also the swr on the diagnostic screen is higher than what my SWR/Power meter says. Like I mentioned before, my dummy load measures 49.7 OHMS.?
After the QMX gets warm, I can no longer power it down unless I unplug it. Do I also have a power supply problem?
?
Sorry for being such a pain.
James
KA9TII |
Re: Still no output on QMX
did you have a good dummy load attached when you pressed T to turn on transmit?? The SWR of 2.8 is much higher than it should be.? With a 50ohm dummy load it should be 1.1 or so. On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:11?PM James via <jmrobertsjmr=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Pwr output dramaticly decrease with higher Freq. from 6 W to 0W, for 160 to 20Mc
Hi Guido
I can only offer my findings for the same power output problem.? I found the driver IC in my QMX+, the 74ACT08D did not have sufficient output at the higher frequencies.? I found this with the oscilloscope but had to remove the BS170's in case they were loading the driver at the higher frequencies.? It proved that the voltage out of the driver decreased with increasing frequency.? I replaced the driver and the QMX+ operated correctly.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Greg
ZL4GW |
Re: QMX crashes on RF filter sweep (and other anomalies)
Hi John
I've got a little further with the fault finding.? Reverting to the earlier firmware made no difference.
With the good QMX+ I enabled IQ mode and ran Audacity.? After working out how to set it up I got the correct wave forms.? However on connecting the newer QMX+ I have a very different waveform which leads me to believing that the PCM1804 is faulty!!? It is sheer bad luck that both my QMX+'s had the same faulty IC. I should have ordered 2 of them from Digikey originally.
I can confirm that what you described with your hardware tests are exactly the same as mine.?
The transmitter works properly and there is output on all bands. The cw sidetone works.
So now I need to replace IC407.
I hope you have better success with yours.
Regards
Greg
ZL4GW |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss