For still photos of an electronic project, a binocular scope such as the SE400Z is fine.
You can pop a camera in and take a photo before the subject crawls off the stage.
A biologist could more easily justify spending twice as much for a trinocular scope.
?
Jerry, KE7ER
?
?
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 06:24 AM, Dino Papas wrote:
May have missed someone mentioning this....if you have any thought of using a video camera in conjunction with your microscope make sure you get a "trinocular" scope; if you don't you will lose one of the direct optical cylinders for use with the camera while using the camera. A trinocular scope allows you to both video and retain two-eye vision capability. A friend of mine found that out the hard way and I made sure to opt for that kind of scope when I got mine.
?
73 - Dino KL?S
