¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: QMX article in the QST


 

To put those numbers in perspective: the QMX doesn't have the strong signal performance of a state of the art 2024 design, nor should we expect it to at its price point. Aside from the number for blocking gain compression, which is likely caused by AGC action rather than blocking in the front end, those numbers would have been respectable for a high end rig in 1994. They're still good enough to make using the QMX on the air a pleasant experience in anything but the busiest contest conditions,?and better than we'll see from most rigs that?cost under $1,000. The excellent numbers for transmit keying sidebands are also worthy of note, and the fast T/R turnaround means that it will work well for full QSK. The CW keying waveforms are also outstanding; no shortening of the first dit, and both of the dits on the scope trace are the correct length.


On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 6:37?PM Steven Dick, K1RF via <sbdick=[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks - colors did not reproduce correctly in the specs on the left side of P38. Here's a version with correct colors.
-Steve K1RF


------ Original Message ------
From "Randy K7RAN via " <padawer@...>
Date 10/13/2024 5:53:04 PM
Subject Re: [QRPLabs] QMX article in the QST

Here's a fair use copy of the review only:
?

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.