Hi Hans,
?
Yes, I completely agree that the firmware approach is a wise move and look forward to seeing how that develops. This was purely meant as a stop-gap solution to get my QMX back into a useable state after a fair bit of to and fro with various encoders and the frustration of constantly skipped steps.
?
With the cap values used, the radio keeps up well with fast encoder rotations and doesn't seem to suffer any skipped steps.?
?
On a side-note, I remember making a little tuning add-on for my original QCX "classics" that piggy-backed on the encoder and emulated its rotation at different speeds and directions based on the position of a pot. I was amazed at the time just how fast I could go before things got glitchy.
Here's a video of the box in action:
?
Cheers,?
Ronan
MM0IVR?
?
