开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Defective PCM1804


 

开云体育

Most devices are tested at the die stage of manufacture, but not many devices are 100% tested after packaging.? ?Over 50 years of designing and have pcb assemblies made, the failure rates are extremely low.?

Sent from


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Chuck AI7SY <chuck@...>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 3:16:56 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] Defective PCM1804
?
Wolfgang Pauli once said to Niels Bohr after a lecture "Your idea is crazy, but is it crazy enough?".

My kit arrived Monday, and I've been finishing a 1.25m repeater before starting (think of a horse hanging their own carrot on a stick), but I opened the box to examine the packaging.

It would seem to be difficult to damage the chip once it's mounted on a board with ~1000 uf of bypassing. TI puts its usual 2 kV input static protection on this chip. So one has to work some to break the thing.

Hans, if you don't see such a problem with the QRP Labs assembly crew, I would posit that the issue could be static buildup inside the packaging, during shipping. Every little jostle rubbing the bubble wrap on the cardboard...

A possible solution could be as simple as antistatic bagging the main board for shipping.

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.