The "not seeing it" issue on the website may have been your web-browser's cache. Probably it has resolved by now. OTOH, the direct link Hans offered above should not have that issue:
In the presentation, Hans observed that this is not a super-portable form-factor. It's bigger, and meant for experimentation. In the shop you can by a developer's board and there's lots of room in the case (as in the QCX) for customization. Personally, I'm thinking ATU. Then the device is going to start to feel an awful lot like a K2: another desktop device that COULD be used portable, would be great for field day, but seems happiest on the bench. My QMX "classic" will remain my go-to field radio.
Also, I found the QMX very challenging to build and, though it worked at first, I ultimately sent it off to Jeff Moore for some help cleaning up my mistakes. I'm very encouraged by the thought of a slightly more spacious board for building.
I'm also imagining what might be done with a dedicated RaspberryPi controlling the radio and receiving the audio out. External DSP? Waterfall? KH1's "scan" feature? Nothing that couldn't have been done on the QMX. But a shift from ultra-portable to more featureful.
I'm pretty excited about the broad coverage of the device: that's the huge selling point for me. Oh, and the price. For my own purposes, the QCX+ is an IC-7300 killer.
(I laughed at Farhan's FDIM presentation, making fun of the relays in the IC-7300. That was exactly my experience: it was super difficult for me to send on the clubhouse IC-7300 at first, trying to ignore those relays & fan. At least as bad as the now-eliminated thump in the QMX!)
I'm also excited about the continued development of the firmware. Hans licked the CW "thump" and I really enjoy using my QMX now. I don't actually care for SSB, but I'll be pleased when I have that feature anyway. You know Hans wants to get that done and published. He'll be blowing open a whole new market for the whole product line.
I sure hope he ordered a lot of boards!
73 de Todd W2TEF