¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Tripods and/or attachments for Macro work


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I have a rather nice one of those reflectors that I¡¯ve basically never used. ?I need to really give it a try, especially for portrait work, which is why I bought it.

Overall, I prefer ¡°available light¡± photography. ?Which helps explain why I was in the woods, with rain and snow, and fighting to get decent photos. :-)

Zane





On Apr 3, 2023, at 1:01 PM, RobO <R_Offer@...> wrote:

Zane
?
There is always the option of using a softer light [natural] by using a reflector. A small one clipped to a tripod or propped up or even hand held by an assistant.? Softer light can be pleasing to the eye. ..... just a [cheaper] thought!
?
Similar to this -?
?
All the best
Bob
?
?
From:?Zane Healy
Sent:?03 April 2023 20:48
To:?[email protected]
Subject:?Re: [Nikon-DSLR] Tripods and/or attachments for Macro work
?
Based on Scott Ditzel¡¯s comment in another thread, I suspect that both of us need to invest in a ring flash, and that would likely give better results than a focusing rail. ?I¡¯m definitely curious about using a ring flash with my ¡°new¡± 105mm f/2.8G VR Macro.
?
I¡¯m not sure what modern books might give the information, but books like the old ¡°Nikon F Nikkormat Handbook of Photography¡±, give a lot of info and tables for tubes, and other devices for Macro. ?I believe this includes info on the DOF. ?With the transition to digital, I¡¯ve not really seen that sort of info published anywhere, or perhaps I¡¯m not looking in the right locations.
?
Zane
?
?
?


On Apr 3, 2023, at 11:27 AM, Jon <kd5sfa@...> wrote:
?
Thanks Zane.
In researching more and after my recent experience with the macro tubes, I believe I need to invest in a focusing rail as my next step. I¡¯m just amazed at the super shallow depth of field with the 50mm at f/16 with the 36mm tube.?
?
Jon
?
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 13:13 Zane Healy <healyzh@...> wrote:
I have way more tripods than any sane person should.? There are reasons for what I have.? When I was first getting serious with a D300, I picked up the Gitzo G2220 cheap, as it was a display unit (I was looking at Manfrotto tripods when my wife pointed it out).? It made a world of difference.? Everything else has been purchased used, for a fraction of their value, except the Bogen which was given to me.
?
Gitzo G2220 ¡ª This one can¡¯t handle a heavy camera/lens, as the legs start to spread, but it¡¯s great for Macro work.? This was my first real tripod (as opposed to using a vintage travel tripod from my Mom¡¯s Yashica 44LM). The legs can be put at basically any angle.
Gitzo G340 ¡ª This is now my ¡°general use¡± tripod, it¡¯s a pain to pack, but I really love this tripod, it can handle just about anything I shoot with.
Gitzo G410 ¡ª For 11x14 Camera
Gitzo G1155T ¡ª For my Leica M10P
?
A little Bogen tripod for my Rolleiflex.
?
Majestic ¡ª No clue on the model, the guy I deal with the most at my favorite local camera store, happened to see me walking out of a competitors store with it, and commented that it could be used to hold up a small car.? I¡¯m not convinced he was joking. It has a Majestic head on it, with a plate for Large Format cameras.? It can easily handle my 11x14 camera.? I¡¯ve taken it out in the field with my 8x10, and that requires a baby stroller to move it and the camera.? The 11x14 can be moved easily in a wagon with the Gitzo G410. ?
?
?
If I¡¯m using Tubes, I¡¯m going to be using a focusing rail.
?
Another option I have, is to use my Nikon D800 on a 4x5 monorail camera, with G-Claron lenses.? This is the option I¡¯m likely to go for extreme Macro¡¯s.? This is actually why I¡¯ve kept the Majestic tripod.? It¡¯s a good base for this type of photography.
?
?
?
Zane
?
?


On Apr 1, 2023, at 4:12 PM, Jon <kd5sfa@...> wrote:
?
I have a set of Kenko extension tubes I have sort of dabbled with.
Today I pulled them out to see what sort of impact they have with my Sigma 50mm f/1.4.? The 36mm extension makes a huge difference and I see the absolute need for a tripod due to the shallow depth of field and close distance to the subject.?
?
While my current tripod allows for the legs to be splayed out, it still may not be able to get down close enough to the subject.? I am thinking I may need an arm on a ball head with a second ball head for the camera to accommodate what I am trying to accomplish. Would replacing the current pan/tilt head with a ball head with an extension arm that has a ball head for the camera be a viable option?
?
My current tripod is a Slik 300 DX, while not a high dollar tripod it is much sturdier than many of the sub $100 tripods out there. What have others worked with?
?
Granted someday I¡¯ll need to sink a chunk into one of the better tripods and ball heads.
?
Jon
?
?
?
?

?

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.