¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Human ear capabilities / cables ()
--- kikeg@... wrote: [...] If I take a recording of a violin and convert it to a 256kbs mp3, the difference is pretty obvious to my ears. I don't doubt that there are types of program material
By gmhg41 · #154 ·
Re: omnis again
I misread, I took the 16db from the post. I agree 25db still looks like a question. Might be a fun to use hearing aid mics for stealth mics for the concert people but maybe not ideal for pipe organs.
By Rich Peet · #153 ·
Re: omnis again
Rich Peet wrote: I saw a spec of 25 dB SPL A-weighted (69 dB SNR) which is pretty good, especially for such a small capsule, but by no means spectacular. If the total A-weighted noise is 25 dB SPL
By Bob Cain <arcane@...> · #152 ·
Re: omnis again
I believe you to be comparing specs that can not be compared. Note the note on the bottom of the page that you have to write for the performance specs used in testing. I just see it as impossible that
By Rich Peet · #151 ·
Re: Human Ear Capabilities
just a thought, perhaps not directly connected. i have always been fascinated by the terminology we tend to use, when describing sound qualities of equipment. why is it always so closely connected to
By umashankar mantravadi <umashanks@...> · #150 ·
omnis again
Hi, sorry to post again. I have been looking at Knowles Electronics' FG series microphones, and they look pretty good. There are two types, a 30 db max self noise version (the 3329) and a lower noise
By Mike N. <nolleym@...> · #149 ·
church omnis
Hi, I'm interested in building a couple of omnis for recording a large church organ. Should I stock up on the panasonics before they run out, or should I try other condenser capsules? I've heard that
By Mike N. <nolleym@...> · #148 ·
WM-61A suitable replacment for the WM-60s?
The 61s are about 7 db more hotter than the WM-60s. Are these suitable replacement for loud enviroments like live music? I have used these in the past with mixed results. Anyone have other
By Darren <dnemeth01@...> · #147 ·
Re: Human Ear Capabilities and resultant mic design needs
Rich Peet wrote: It can also occur within the ear. The linearity of the mechanical portion alone should be highly suspect. It's even possible that evolution tuned the non-linearity so as to expose the
By Bob Cain <arcane@...> · #146 ·
Re: Human Ear Capabilities
Walter Knapp wrote: The former being precisely the focus of this group. Others can focus elsewhere if they wish. That may be your point, Walt, but mine is to understand and perfect the transducer and
By Bob Cain <arcane@...> · #145 ·
Re: Panasonic cap gping
Geoff, the show is over inregards to the entire WM-60 line. They are not making any more as of early next year. See the message I jsut posted for the sad details. Darren
By Darren <dnemeth01@...> · #144 ·
Panasonic cap gping
Just got this: * You have purchased the following part number(s) from Digi-Key within the last two years. The manufacturer has announced this part(s) will become obsolete. PANASONIC - ECG
By Geoff Wood <geoff@...> · #143 ·
(No subject)
Its official. All WM-60A microphone capsules are being discontinued as of March 2004. I just got the bad news directly from Digi-Key. Below is what they said. Darren Hello Darren, Attached is the
By Darren <dnemeth01@...> · #142 ·
Human Ear Capabilities and resultant mic design needs
If intermod exsists and forms a lower frequency result would I be correct that I only care if it occured in free air and not within the microphone? If it occured in free air than the mic with a 20khz
By Rich Peet · #141 ·
Re: Human Ear Capabilities
From: Dick Campbell <rhcamp@...> It's interesting to realize that before there was digital that a great deal of the analog equipment did not get to 16KHz if that. Yet folks called the recordings
By Walter Knapp · #140 ·
Re: Human ear capabilities / cables ()
From: Jason May <Jason_May@...>
By Walter Knapp · #139 ·
Re: Human ear capabilities / cables ()
The headphones used are rated 0.1% THD, I believe the measurement is done at 1 KHz and 1 mW, but I guess at the levels I used, distortion could be greater than this. However, I don't think (but I
By KikeG <kikeg@...> · #138 ·
Re: Human Ear Capabilities
?? I don't think so. AFAIK, ear is deaf to phase polarity if applied to both ears the same relative phase, and the transduction system is linear in the sense of responding in the same way
By KikeG <kikeg@...> · #137 ·
Re: Digest Number 12
well frequency frequencies). Agreed, and agreed to all the previous comments. quantify picture. True, but the issue I was just pointing was that I can hear pure tones over 18 KHz if I raise the
By KikeG <kikeg@...> · #136 ·
Re: Human ear capabilities / cables ()
By Geoff Wood <geoff@...> · #135 ·