Re: Welcome all
That makes sense to me. I think it might be a good idea to just post a notice on the old page from time to time so that people can find this one easily. I suggest you make someone else and "owner" of
By
gmhg41
·
#11
·
|
Re: New photos in the "Photo" section
What is your dynamic experiment? Please describe. Thanks. Mac
By
Macrohenry
·
#10
·
|
New photos in the "Photo" section
I upploaded som photos of mics I've built. The most convinient place for this was the "Photo"-section. Could we post all photos here?
By
ljudatervinning <ljud.atervinning@...>
·
#9
·
|
Re: Panasonic Mic Capsule Wired to XLR Connector
iloccom wrote: This requires some kind of differential amplifier or transformer. ADI differential drivers are known to be quite good (SSM2142 for example, www.analog.com). Indrek -- Indrek Rebane |
By
Indrek Rebane <indrek@...>
·
#8
·
|
Re: condenser fet transisters.
Rich Peet wrote: EMI shielding effect in capsule for noisy environments? FET inputs are extremely sensitive. Indrek -- Indrek Rebane | Borthwick-Pignon Electronics Engineer | Tartu Science Park Phone:
By
Indrek Rebane <indrek@...>
·
#7
·
|
condenser fet transisters.
I recently ran across a microphone capsule that appears to keep its fet a few inches outside of the capsule. If there is no downside to that design I could see modifications of the inexpensive
By
Rich Peet
·
#6
·
|
Re: Welcome all
Mac suggests that I shouldn't even bother with posting from the original group and making a mirror of those messages here. It would save me time if we did make a clean break. Let me know if anyone has
By
Rich Peet
·
#5
·
|
Hello everybody!
Haven't been posting, but I have been keeping up with the group. Got a couple projects in the works and I'll be sharing them soon.
By
dayVel
·
#4
·
|
hello all
i aagree we need the new group. so here i am umashankar
By
umashankar <umashanks@...>
·
#3
·
|
hello all
i aagree we need the new group. so here i am umashankar
By
umashankar <umashanks@...>
·
#2
·
|
Welcome all
I have volunteered to moderate this new group. It is a transition from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MicDIYers/ which was wounded by large quantities of spam. I will hold an open period of "open
By
Rich Peet
·
#1
·
|
Re: Schoeps schematic part omission
Sanaka: No. There was "~200mV" AC at this point without the capacitor. You must differentiate between AC and DC conditions. The DC voltage over this capacitor is 33.4 V DC in the original Schoeps
By
Goran Finnberg
·
#7538
·
|
Re: Schoeps Redux
Richard Lee: Sorry no. I have never ever seen any CMC 5 body not perfectly adjusted for minimum K2, by adjusting P1, for minimum distortion. BTW, passing by Schoeps home in Karlsruhe, Germany early
By
Goran Finnberg
·
#10032
·
|
37401 - 37413 of 37413