开云体育

Dear mic experts, I'm trying to design a discrete amplifier for an electret capsule and have quite a technical question that is puzzling me. The device is a PUI AOM-5024L. I encountered the

https://theelectronicgoldmine.com/products/g20898c?mc_cid=95eb77a4eb&mc_eid=6b88d3e52c

No, not like the AKG D99. I used the ITU-T P.58 standard "HEAD AND TORSO SIMULATOR FOR TELEPHONOMETRY" as a design specification and took their drawing and made 3/4 inch slices through it. I cut them

Like the AKG D99? Am So., 19. Nov. 2023 um 06:26 Uhr schrieb eric benjamin < ericmbenj@...>:

That is a really lovely piece of work. I made a dummy head out of slices of wood about twenty years ago but it's not nearly as attractive. My slices were horizontal.

There is FLAC compression. Lossless. It reduced the size substantially.

Yes, the size matters. Making a bigger head will improve bass separation but will not reproduce acoustic panorama faithfully. The whole point of the dummy head is to reproduce acoustic character of

Hello, I've drafted up a DIY design that I think could work to drive an electret capsule like the TSB-2555B through the use of a DC-DC converter ( IEB0105S12 (

Microphones with "lobar" patterns use specific acoustic additions to achieve them. Typically multiple tubes or multiple tapped tubes. Capsules by themselves are 1st-order, ranging from omni to fig-8

Just about any curved "dish" shape will provide some focusing and gain. This article has some suggestions ( https://www.ehow.com/way_5569096_doityourself-parabolic-microphone.html ) for common items

Yes it will effect sound quality. But portability might be something to consider.Sent using Zoho Mail ---- On Thu,16 Nov 2023 23:00:41 -0500 clistburnham@... wrote ----Do the dimensions matter?

I suspect the lobar pattern comes more from the interference tube, not the capsule itself. (I’m definitely not an expert on shotgun mic design… but if it were possible to create a lobar pattern

Hi there - i was wondering if there are electret elements with lobar patterns. i'm not seeing any on a simple google search - and i'm curious about why that might be. Thanks!

Size matters. The larger, the better the bass respons will be. This is in direct relationship of the wavelength. E.g. the disc is 68cm diameter: frequencies above 500Hz will have a boost and high

Do the dimensions matter? i'm seeing a lot of shapes and sizes... are there simple rules-of-thumb that people use?

My apologies for the huge file size, I’ll keep that in mind for any future posts. I do plan on adding ears to it so hopefully that will aid in ?generating something approaching an HRTF.

Am 16.11.23 um 16:33 schrieb Dibutil Ftalat: This "earless head" is more reminiscent of Joerg Wuttke's hapless Spherical Surface Microphone, some sort of dummy head sans HRTF. Basically, yet another

This sounds like a decent, dry stereo recording, did not feel any "binaurality" which you get if recording live in your own head with Roland CS-10EM. Much better results I get from a piece PVC tube

I made one from my neighbor's discarded parabolic heater that he bought at Costco. The rest was easy. https://www.google.com/search?q=Parabolic+heater&sca_esv=582945116&tbm=isch

Very cool! If you could please, though - please avoid sending huge .wav files to the group. Thanks, -Scott