Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
Reducing voltage decreases spl capability more rapidly than decreasing gain.
By
Jerry Lee Marcel
·
#35884
·
|
Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
Hi Jules, Thank you, my EM200 now works with PiP. And it sounds amazing, handling high SPL just as I wish. And I wonder if it is higher working voltage results higher sensitivity, so I can do the
By
Torciv <lljh80305@...>
·
#35883
·
|
Re: Transformer sound signatures
I'm sorry to say, despite Paul's reputation, what he says doesn't make much sense. I would say the answer is at the measure of the question. The sonic difference between a Neve and an API is the
By
Jerry Lee Marcel
·
#35882
·
|
Re: Transformer sound signatures
this Chris Preston guy seems to be extremely knowledgeable regarding all things transformers. on this page of his site http://www.vintagewindings.com/tech%20swag/misc%20paper%20page.html look for the
By
Pierre Olivier
·
#35881
·
|
Transformer sound signatures
A brief description of old consoles¡¯ transformer sound signatures and why dirt and distortion are sought after: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDHfV-AR8JY The two classes of transformer distortion
By
Henry Spragens
·
#35880
·
|
Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
Thanks for reply, I will try it soon. My previous post is actually a study after X8¡¯s built-in mics, interestingly, they have R and C. But since it¡¯s not working, I should remind anyone saw it,
By
Torciv <lljh80305@...>
·
#35879
·
|
Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
That R and C are already in the recorder. Connect S&G together and to the sleeve and D to the tip. That will work for PIP Best Regards, Jules Ryckebusch
By
Jules Ryckebusch
·
#35878
·
|
Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
In case it's germane: https://www.reddit.com/r/fieldrecording/comments/10p5pm8/pluginpower_voltage_measurements_on_tascam/
By
Casey
·
#35877
·
|
Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
This was my build for Tascam X8¡¯s PiP input, not working though. Tovi Jules Ryckebusch <ryckebusch@...> ì¶ 2023Äê12ÔÂ4ÈÕ 11:52 Œ‘µÀ£º ?I will draw it up tomorrow. How did you do the
By
Torciv <lljh80305@...>
·
#35876
·
|
Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
Hello Arjay, I'm very sorry but I have only just seen your and others members replies to this thread. Yes, of course you are quite correct, my description of the way to wire the capsule was wrong, I
By
ROSS HALE
·
#35875
·
|
Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
I will draw it up tomorrow. How did you do the pip wiring? Best Regards, Jules
By
Jules Ryckebusch
·
#35874
·
|
Re: Primo EM200 + simple P48
Hi Jules, Could you share the schmatic of your EM200 build? I bought 3 EM200, my first build with PiP isn't working, I might kill the capsule. A stable EM200 + P48 could be a salvation to my project.
By
Torciv <lljh80305@...>
·
#35873
·
|
Re: SimpleP48 updated
Hi Richard, The original doc, together with other comments and notes in this group, were sufficient for me to successfully make a couple pairs of simpleP48 mics that work very well. Nonetheless,
By
kennjava
·
#35872
·
|
Re: SimpleP48 updated
Your comments are very valuable, thank you very much. As far as I remember, in 2017 I discovered Tom Benedict articles, and realized a simple schematic for a pair of EM172 capsules according to "DIY
By
Andrzej Sochon
·
#35871
·
|
Re: SimpleP48 updated
Phase matters if you are using other mikes in the same setup.? My original drawing with pins numbered wrongly, showing the wrong side etc. was less than helpful.? I try, even in my old age, to make
By
Richard Lee
·
#35870
·
|
Re: SimpleP48 updated
Thank you very much for the link. Maybe I am wrong, but in my opinion the only difference is that connections to XLR pins 2 and 3 are swapped. It makes the signal phase is reversed. Does it make
By
Andrzej Sochon
·
#35869
·
|
SimpleP48 updated
Andrzej Sochon: /g/MicBuilders/files/Ricardo/SimpleP48 ------------ Best regards, Goran Finnberg The Mastering Room AB Goteborg Sweden E-mail: mastering@... Learn from the
By
Goran Finnberg
·
#35868
·
|
Re: SimpleP48 updated
Is revised version of SimpleP48 ready? I would be very grateful for the link. Kind Regards, Andrzej Sochon
By
Andrzej Sochon
·
#35867
·
|
Re: SimpleP48 updated
Thanks Richard. Every time I build one and explain to someone that there are two components, they default to "must be something cheesy or wrong" Nope just really simple and elegant way to do things.
By
Jules Ryckebusch
·
#35866
·
|
Re: SimpleP48 updated
Awesome, thanks for the update, and thanks for keeping the SimpleP48 dream alive. :-)
By
Casey
·
#35865
·
|