|
I have some gcode that I wrote a long time ago, using cambam, I think. It made the circles for me so I did not need to understand G code arcs. Over the years I have move the circular pockets relative to each other by using offsets.
I want to get rid of the offsets for various reasons. I still am not clear on arcs but is moving the location of an arc less complicated than I think it may be? Here is an example. I use G52 to set the X and Y offsets. To move the circle without using offsets do I just need to add the offsets to all X and Y coordinates and add the X offset to the I and the Y offset to the J.
I hope it is that easy :)
G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F146 X0.0095 Y0.0
G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095
G2 F40.0 X-0.1048 Y-0.1814 I-0.2095 J0.0
G2 F40 Y0.1814 I0.1048 J0.1814
G2 X0.2095 Y0.0 I0.1048 J-0.1814
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
To answer my own question maybe. It looks like I am j are relatibe so they should not be offset
Feb 12, 2022 4:02:44 PM spencer@...:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I have some gcode that I wrote a long time ago, using cambam, I think. It made the circles for me so I did not need to understand G code arcs. Over the years I have move the circular pockets relative to each other by using offsets.
I want to get rid of the offsets for various reasons. I still am not clear on arcs but is moving the location of an arc less complicated than I think it may be? Here is an example. I use G52 to set the X and Y offsets. To move the circle without using offsets do I just need to add the offsets to all X and Y coordinates and add the X offset to the I and the Y offset to the J.
I hope it is that easy :)
G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F146 X0.0095 Y0.0
G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095
G2 F40.0 X-0.1048 Y-0.1814 I-0.2095 J0.0
G2 F40 Y0.1814 I0.1048 J0.1814
G2 X0.2095 Y0.0 I0.1048 J-0.1814
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
Take a look at this web page, very clear:
:) :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected]] On Behalf Of spencer@... Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2022 8:12 PM To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question To answer my own question maybe. It looks like I am j are relatibe so they should not be offset Feb 12, 2022 4:02:44 PM spencer@...: I have some gcode that I wrote a long time ago, using cambam, I think. It made the circles for me so I did not need to understand G code arcs. Over the years I have move the circular pockets relative to each other by using offsets.
I want to get rid of the offsets for various reasons. I still am not clear
on arcs but is moving the location of an arc less complicated than I think it may be? Here is an example. I use G52 to set the X and Y offsets. To move the circle without using offsets do I just need to add the offsets to all X and Y coordinates and add the X offset to the I and the Y offset to the J.
I hope it is that easy :)
G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F146 X0.0095 Y0.0
G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095
G2 F40.0 X-0.1048 Y-0.1814 I-0.2095 J0.0
G2 F40 Y0.1814 I0.1048 J0.1814
G2 X0.2095 Y0.0 I0.1048 J-0.1814
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
that is the first place i looked. i did a couple of tests but not a successful one yet. the one in the thumb drive that i have not tested yet should work. i probably got some addition wrong in the first one. i need to figure out how to use my calculator reliably with negative numbers. Actually I just thought of using a spreadsheet but the copying and pasting would be a bitch.
Then I thought of writing a script to apply the offsets but that would be pretty complicated and a lot of work for one use. Does anyone have a script already written to do this?
If I clean up the gcode, remove comments format every statement the same, it might not be too difficult of a script.
i am just so awful at simple math. i would rather figure out a complicated formula than add a couple of numbers :) And don't ask me about multiplying. I would be lost without a calculator.
i am working on the spreadsheet, decided scripts will take all day to write.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/13/2022 2:13 AM, Paul Galarneau via groups.io wrote: Take a look at this web page, very clear:
:) :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
spencer@...
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2022 8:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
To answer my own question maybe. It looks like I am j are relatibe so they
should not be offset
Feb 12, 2022 4:02:44 PM spencer@...:
I have some gcode that I wrote a long time ago, using cambam, I think. It made the circles for me so I did not need to understand G code arcs. Over
the years I have move the circular pockets relative to each other by using
offsets.
I want to get rid of the offsets for various reasons. I still am not clear on arcs but is moving the location of an arc less complicated than I think
it may be? Here is an example. I use G52 to set the X and Y offsets. To move
the circle without using offsets do I just need to add the offsets to all X
and Y coordinates and add the X offset to the I and the Y offset to the J.
I hope it is that easy :)
G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F146 X0.0095 Y0.0
G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095
G2 F40.0 X-0.1048 Y-0.1814 I-0.2095 J0.0
G2 F40 Y0.1814 I0.1048 J0.1814
G2 X0.2095 Y0.0 I0.1048 J-0.1814
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
Have you got CAD in any form? Can it export a DXF file? If you have answered yes to both of these it may be worth using a simple DXF to Gcode CAM program to create your Gcode. The one I use is Estlcam. This is available for download and can be used a number of times before you get a nagging to buy it. It takes a small amount of time to be able to use it easily but it is worth spending some time with it for relatively simple jobs like this. I also do not understand why the circular path has been divided into three segments when a single line of code can replace the three arcs you have used. G52 X 0.01 Y .6125(thru hole)(1ST PASS)G1 F146 X0.0095 Y0.0G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095G2 F40.0 X0.2095 y0 I-0.2095 J0.0
This makes it easier to understand and to change to climb milling you just need to change the G2 to G3 Another option is to arc into the start position by changing the line? G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095 to G2 F40 Z-0.34 X0.2095 I0.1 J0
This could all be followed by an arc out as well G2 F40 Z0 X0.0095 I-0.1 J0G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F14 X0.0095 Y0.0
G2 F40 Z-0.34 X0.2095 I0.1 J0
G2 F40.0 X0.2095 y0 I-0.2095 J0.0
G2 F40 Z0 X0.0095 I-0.1 J0
The arc in and arc out avoids dwell at the start and finish of the hole to keep it smooth
Have you considered using parameters to produce your gcode? For a simple hole like this you can have four parameters such as #51, #52, #53 #54 which are used for the hole position X, Y, the depth Z and the radius of the path.
For your hole for example
(thru hole)
?
#51 = 0.0095? ? ?(X position)
#52 = 0? ? ? ? ? ? ? (Y position)
#53 = -0.34? ? ? ? (Z depth)
#54 = 0.2095? ? ?(radius)
?
(1ST PASS)
G1 F14 X#51 Y#52 Z0
G2 F40 Z#53 X[#51+#54] I[#54/2] J0
G2 F40 X[#51+#54] y#52 I[0-#54] J0
G2 F40 Z0 X#51 I[0-#54/2] J0
Change the #number parameter values to suit your needs. You can repeat the section as many times as needed with different parameters? to make a pattern of holes and differing depths and diameters as well. You could also another parameter for the initial Z height.
?
Martin
|
If your willing to do 180 or less you can do R style arcs. I find that most people have a hard time with the I J vectors to tell where the start point is. But the radius seems to be something that everyone can do !
G0 X1 Y1
G02 X2 R.5 F50
G01 Y0
G02 X1 R.5 F50
G01 Y1
M30
This is how I do it when I am doing hand coded parts. I also use cutter comp so I can reuse the code for finish and roughing passes. But I have been told that I am not normal anymore :(
Thanks
Brian
______________________________
Brian Barker
Engineering / Development
ArtSoft | Newfangled Solutions
Livermore Falls, Maine (USA)
Webpage:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/13/2022 2:09 PM, spencer@... wrote: that is the first place i looked. i did a couple of tests but not a successful one yet. the one in the thumb drive that i have not tested yet should work. i probably got some addition wrong in the first one. i need to figure out how to use my calculator reliably with negative numbers. Actually I just thought of using a spreadsheet but the copying and pasting would be a bitch.
Then I thought of writing a script to apply the offsets but that would be pretty complicated and a lot of work for one use. Does anyone have a script already written to do this?
If I clean up the gcode, remove comments format every statement the same, it might not be too difficult of a script.
i am just so awful at simple math. i would rather figure out a complicated formula than add a couple of numbers :) And don't ask me about multiplying. I would be lost without a calculator.
i am working on the spreadsheet, decided scripts will take all day to write.
On 2/13/2022 2:13 AM, Paul Galarneau via groups.io wrote:
Take a look at this web page, very clear:
:) :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
spencer@...
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2022 8:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
To answer my own question maybe. It looks like I am j are relatibe so they
should not be offset
Feb 12, 2022 4:02:44 PM spencer@...:
I have some gcode that I wrote a long time ago, using cambam, I think. It made the circles for me so I did not need to understand G code arcs. Over
the years I have move the circular pockets relative to each other by using
offsets.
I want to get rid of the offsets for various reasons. I still am not clear on arcs but is moving the location of an arc less complicated than I think
it may be? Here is an example. I use G52 to set the X and Y offsets. To move
the circle without using offsets do I just need to add the offsets to all X
and Y coordinates and add the X offset to the I and the Y offset to the J.
I hope it is that easy :)
G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F146 X0.0095 Y0.0
G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095
G2 F40.0 X-0.1048 Y-0.1814 I-0.2095 J0.0
G2 F40 Y0.1814 I0.1048 J0.1814
G2 X0.2095 Y0.0 I0.1048 J-0.1814
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
I will try to do it this way. I wanted to use cutter comp but could not figure out how to do it with I J specs. It sort of seemed impossible.
Will Mill Wizard make simple easy to understand gcode for holes? I have made much more complicated with cambam but for flat pieces. this part has three machined faces 90 degrees apart and i figured i would never get the positions right so i made all the features centered around 0 and then used offsets to get them right.
The problem is that if i halt the program and rewind it the offsets can be left a mess and i have to restart Mwch4. Just homing and 0 ing offsets does not always work.
If there is a way to completely remove all offsets (including ones that appear to be hidden?) that would allow me to keep the confusing but editable code as it works quite well.
When doing a circle with Mach 4 in several arcs aren't they just as smooth if the speed does not change and trajectory planning is left on? I did not notice hesitation at the move from arc to arc?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/14/2022 3:53 AM, Brian Barker wrote: If your willing to do 180 or less you can do R style arcs. I find that most people have a hard time with the I J vectors to tell where the start point is. But the radius seems to be something that everyone can do !
G0 X1 Y1
G02 X2 R.5 F50
G01 Y0
G02 X1 R.5 F50
G01 Y1
M30
This is how I do it when I am doing hand coded parts. I also use cutter comp so I can reuse the code for finish and roughing passes. But I have been told that I am not normal anymore :(
Thanks
Brian
______________________________
Brian Barker
Engineering / Development
ArtSoft | Newfangled Solutions
Livermore Falls, Maine (USA)
Webpage:
On 2/13/2022 2:09 PM, spencer@... wrote:
that is the first place i looked. i did a couple of tests but not a successful one yet. the one in the thumb drive that i have not tested yet should work. i probably got some addition wrong in the first one. i need to figure out how to use my calculator reliably with negative numbers. Actually I just thought of using a spreadsheet but the copying and pasting would be a bitch.
Then I thought of writing a script to apply the offsets but that would be pretty complicated and a lot of work for one use. Does anyone have a script already written to do this?
If I clean up the gcode, remove comments format every statement the same, it might not be too difficult of a script.
i am just so awful at simple math. i would rather figure out a complicated formula than add a couple of numbers :) And don't ask me about multiplying. I would be lost without a calculator.
i am working on the spreadsheet, decided scripts will take all day to write.
On 2/13/2022 2:13 AM, Paul Galarneau via groups.io wrote:
Take a look at this web page, very clear:
:) :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
spencer@...
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2022 8:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
To answer my own question maybe. It looks like I am j are relatibe so they
should not be offset
Feb 12, 2022 4:02:44 PM spencer@...:
I have some gcode that I wrote a long time ago, using cambam, I think. It made the circles for me so I did not need to understand G code arcs. Over
the years I have move the circular pockets relative to each other by using
offsets.
I want to get rid of the offsets for various reasons. I still am not clear on arcs but is moving the location of an arc less complicated than I think
it may be? Here is an example. I use G52 to set the X and Y offsets. To move
the circle without using offsets do I just need to add the offsets to all X
and Y coordinates and add the X offset to the I and the Y offset to the J.
I hope it is that easy :)
G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F146 X0.0095 Y0.0
G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095
G2 F40.0 X-0.1048 Y-0.1814 I-0.2095 J0.0
G2 F40 Y0.1814 I0.1048 J0.1814
G2 X0.2095 Y0.0 I0.1048 J-0.1814
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
i made the holes with cambam and it did what it did. i would much
prefer a single arc but i thought they had to be less than 180
degrees or some other limit. i just trusted what canbam made.
i like the idea of parameters i use them all? the time in
computer programming.
i think i should start over with the two holes and learn how to
specify a single arc or find a program that does instead of three
or four. Will Estlcam do this?
On 2/14/2022 2:41 AM, Martin Connelly
wrote:
[Edited Message Follows]
Have you got CAD in any form? Can it export a DXF file? If you
have answered yes to both of these it may be worth using a simple
DXF to Gcode CAM program to create your Gcode. The one I use is
Estlcam. This is available for download and can be used a number
of times before you get a nagging to buy it. It takes a small
amount of time to be able to use it easily but it is worth
spending some time with it for relatively simple jobs like this.
I also do not understand why the circular path has been divided
into three segments when a single line of code can replace the
three arcs you have used.
G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F146 X0.0095 Y0.0
G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095
G2 F40.0 X0.2095 y0 I-0.2095 J0.0
This makes it easier to understand and to change to climb
milling you just need to change the G2 to G3
Another option is to arc into the start position by changing the
line?G1 F52 Z-0.34 X0.2095 to G2 F40 Z-0.34 X0.2095 I0.1 J0
This could all be followed by an arc out as well G2 F40 Z0
X0.0095 I-0.1 J0
G52 X 0.01 Y .6125
(thru hole)
(1ST PASS)
G1 F14 X0.0095 Y0.0
G2 F40 Z-0.34 X0.2095 I0.1 J0
G2 F40.0 X0.2095 y0 I-0.2095 J0.0
G2 F40 Z0 X0.0095 I-0.1 J0
The arc in and arc out avoids dwell at the start and finish of
the hole to keep it smooth
Have you considered using parameters to produce your gcode?
For a simple hole like this you can have four parameters such
as #51, #52, #53 #54 which are used for the hole position X,
Y, the depth Z and the radius of the path.
For your hole for example
(thru hole)
?
#51 = 0.0095? ? ?(X position)
#52 = 0? ? ? ? ? ? ? (Y position)
#53 = -0.34? ? ? ? (Z position)
#54 = 0.2095? ? ?(radius)
?
(1ST PASS)
G1 F14 X#51 Y#52
G2 F40 Z#53 X[#51+#54] I[#54/2] J0
G2 F40 X[#51+#54] y#52 I[0-#54] J0
G2 F40 Z0 X#51 I[0-#54/2] J0
Change the #number parameter values to suit your needs. You can
repeat the section as many times as needed with different
parameters? to make a pattern of holes and differing depths and
diameters as well. You could also another parameter for the
initial Z height.
?
Martin
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM, spencer@... wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you want..
But fusion 360 will
|
thanks but can't afford fusion :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 2/14/2022 10:36 AM, Gary wrote: fusion 360
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
me either
I use the free version
|
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to do, With ease.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-sent from my iphone --
On Feb 14, 2022, at 10:36 AM, Gary <g_burke@...> wrote:
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM, spencer@... wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you want..
But fusion 360 will
|
working on it but fucked viasat is making it difficult
On 2/14/2022 11:05 AM, Chuck Kahler
wrote:
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program
It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to do,
With ease.?
Chuck?
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM,
spencer@... wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you want..
But fusion 360 will
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
4th axis works real well in the free version
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-------- Original message -------- From: Chuck Kahler <chuck767@...> Date: 2022-02-14 11:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00) Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to do, With ease.?
Chuck? On Feb 14, 2022, at 10:36 AM, Gary <g_burke@...> wrote:
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM, spencer@... wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you want..
But fusion 360 will
|
it looks like the program is online which means there is about a
3% chance of it working on viasat. i have fought with them for
over a year and they can not seem to get my shit working. replaced
all the hardware from dish to modem and we have a brand new router
and it still sucks. waiting for starlink some day?
On 2/14/2022 11:48 AM, John Dammeyer
wrote:
4th axis works real well in the free version
-------- Original message --------
Date: 2022-02-14 11:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program
It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to do,
With ease.?
Chuck?
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM,
spencer@... wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you want..
But fusion 360 will
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
Starlink??!!? Elon's 'toy'?....? hang that one up.... the last
solar flare just took out something like 30? of the 39? satalites
in orbit just over the last week or so ago.
ptegler
it looks like the program is online which means there is about
a 3% chance of it working on viasat. i have fought with them for
over a year and they can not seem to get my shit working.
replaced all the hardware from dish to modem and we have a brand
new router and it still sucks. waiting for starlink some day?
On 2/14/2022 11:48 AM, John Dammeyer
wrote:
4th axis works real well in the free version
-------- Original message --------
Date: 2022-02-14 11:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program
It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to
do, With ease.?
Chuck?
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM, spencer@...
wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you want..
But fusion 360 will
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
--
Paul Tegler
ptegler@...
|
i think that was satellites that were being launched not ones in
orbit. i believe there are already thousands of them in orbit and
more to be launched. the loss was a setback but not a major one as
far as i know?
On 2/14/2022 12:07 PM, Paul Tegler via
groups.io wrote:
Starlink??!!? Elon's 'toy'?....? hang that one up.... the last
solar flare just took out something like 30? of the 39?
satalites in orbit just over the last week or so ago.
ptegler
it looks like the program is online which means there is
about a 3% chance of it working on viasat. i have fought with
them for over a year and they can not seem to get my shit
working. replaced all the hardware from dish to modem and we
have a brand new router and it still sucks. waiting for
starlink some day?
On 2/14/2022 11:48 AM, John
Dammeyer wrote:
4th axis works real well in the free version
-------- Original message --------
Date: 2022-02-14 11:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program
It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to
do, With ease.?
Chuck?
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM, spencer@...
wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you
want..
But fusion 360 will
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
--
Paul Tegler
ptegler@...
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
In that launch, but
"As of last month, SpaceX had already launched more than 2,000
Starlink satellites, and it plans to double that number."
On 2/14/2022 3:07 PM, Paul Tegler via
groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Starlink??!!? Elon's 'toy'?....? hang that one up.... the last
solar flare just took out something like 30? of the 39?
satalites in orbit just over the last week or so ago.
ptegler
it looks like the program is online which means there is
about a 3% chance of it working on viasat. i have fought with
them for over a year and they can not seem to get my shit
working. replaced all the hardware from dish to modem and we
have a brand new router and it still sucks. waiting for
starlink some day?
On 2/14/2022 11:48 AM, John
Dammeyer wrote:
4th axis works real well in the free version
-------- Original message --------
Date: 2022-02-14 11:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program
It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to
do, With ease.?
Chuck?
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM, spencer@...
wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you
want..
But fusion 360 will
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
--
Paul Tegler
ptegler@...
|
??? ??? Sign up for Starlink , we're running 2 TV's & 2
computers al day with no buffering problems ever . Took i tout of
the box , put the antenna/dish on it's stand plugged it in &
that was it .
animal
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
it looks like the program is online which means there is about
a 3% chance of it working on viasat. i have fought with them for
over a year and they can not seem to get my shit working.
replaced all the hardware from dish to modem and we have a brand
new router and it still sucks. waiting for starlink some day?
On 2/14/2022 11:48 AM, John Dammeyer
wrote:
4th axis works real well in the free version
-------- Original message --------
Date: 2022-02-14 11:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program
It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to
do, With ease.?
Chuck?
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM, spencer@...
wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you want..
But fusion 360 will
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
FU! we have been waiting for many months and everyone says it is
great.
On 2/14/2022 12:58 PM, mike allen
wrote:
??? ??? Sign up for Starlink , we're running 2 TV's & 2
computers al day with no buffering problems ever . Took i tout
of the box , put the antenna/dish on it's stand plugged it in
& that was it .
animal
it looks like the program is online which means there is
about a 3% chance of it working on viasat. i have fought with
them for over a year and they can not seem to get my shit
working. replaced all the hardware from dish to modem and we
have a brand new router and it still sucks. waiting for
starlink some day?
On 2/14/2022 11:48 AM, John
Dammeyer wrote:
4th axis works real well in the free version
-------- Original message --------
Date: 2022-02-14 11:06 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] arc question
I’m with Gary, download Fusion 360.?
It’s an integrated Cad/Cam ?program
It’s free and will do anything you would ever need to
do, With ease.?
Chuck?
?On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM, spencer@...
wrote:
don't know Estlcam will do what you
want..
But fusion 360 will
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
--
Best regards, Spencer Chase
67550 Bell Springs Rd.
Garberville, CA 95542 Postal service only.
Laytonville, CA 95454 UPS only.
Spencer@...
(425) 791-0309
|
