Very informative, thank you for sharing all of this, Rhonda.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
<<4. What is the strangest treatment for COVID 19 you have heard of yet?
The non-treatment is the strangest thing, and total reliance on vaccines, and even banning, outlawing, and creating public campaigns to disparage treatments that actually work,
such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. It makes no sense. The only explanation I can see is the pharma companies paying kickbacks to politicians and journalists to do their dirty work>>
The huge reliance on vaccines is because they work immensely better than any other possible treatment. Prevention is always better than treatment¡ªalways.
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, at best, have a mild positive effect on COVID if taken with 3 ¨C 5 days of first symptoms. They are not in any way a miracle drug. If they were, a drug company would have rebranded them and made millions off of the product.
It is just not true that drug companies don¡¯t make money off of generic drugs¡ªobviously they do, since billions of generic drug prescriptions are sold each year. Drug companies have a lot of tricks they use to rebrand a generic drug, and make brand name profits
off the drug. This is almost always done with prescription drugs nowadays, once they lose their original patent. Just one example is how Xyzal came out once Zyrtec went off patent¡ªthese drugs are essentially the same drug, even though they are legally different.
This can even be done with drugs that never actually had a patent, such as when a drug company decided to capitalize on the studies showing the benefits of fish oil, and came out with Lovaza¡ªprescription only fish oil that originally sold for $1,000 for a
30 day supply. Even though fish oil could still be easily bought OTC from a variety of sources, Lovaza made GSK over $1,000,000,000/yr in the US alone when it first came out. There are thousands of different drug companies around the world, if hydroxychloroquine
or ivermectin actually worked, at least one of these companies would have capitalized on it. There is no reason why any pharmaceutical company would have paid any politician or journalist (much less all of the thousands of ones they would have to pay), to
state that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin really don¡¯t work.
The reason the FDA came out against it, was especially with hydroxychloroquine where so many people rely on it for a quality of life, because so many people were buying it for COVID treatments, that there were huge shortages of these products, and the people
who needed these drugs for their FDA approved conditions, could not obtain them. The shortages have since been fixed with hydroxychloroquine, as generic companies have ramped up production of it, but ivermectin is still in very short supply (since with the
huge surge in COVID cases, prescriptions for it have likewise ramped up.)
It is not illegal for doctors to prescribe hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin for COVID, even though the evidence shows little to know benefit, and many doctors do prescribe these drugs because their patients request them.
Rhonda
?