¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Firday FIve November 14


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

?


On Nov 21, 2024, at 21:04, Pat Trivers via groups.io <pat_trivers@...> wrote:

?

.
// ? ??The first woman president will be a big deal? ? ?//

?
Oh, I don't know, Pat. ?I grew up in a female world, but the focused grievances of those days are gone, replaced by eternal media anger about everything. ?Women presidents and prime ministers are no longer even novelties. ?Celebrity is greatly overrated. ?Let it go.
?
I agree, David. Except for in the USA, which may be the only country in the world that hasn't yet had a female leader. An awful lot of women seemed to be voting for her just because she's a woman, and expecting all other women to vote for her for the same reason. I personally would never vote for someone just because they are a woman. I choose the best candidate with the best qualities and policies, and who cares which sex or what race they are? But a lot of women seem to care - the leftist types, for whom ability and qualification don't matter, but "identity group" is everything. And the first woman's name will go down in history as the First Woman President as if that is a major accomplishment. I would hate for it to be someone so awful and unqualified as Kamala Harris. Or an evil bitch like Hillary Clinton.
?
Pat

?

------ Original Message ------
From: dvdcsmth@...
To: tbil@... Cc: [email protected]; m-scholars-and-scribes@...; [email protected]; m-positive@...; pat_trivers@...
Sent: Tuesday, November 19th 2024, 06:53 PM
Subject: Re: [PhilosophicalM] [M-Positive} Re: Firday FIve November 14
?

?

// ? ??The first woman president will be a big deal? ? ?//

?
Oh, I don't know, Pat. ?I grew up in a female world, but the focused grievances of those days are gone, replaced by eternal media anger about everything. ?Women presidents and prime ministers are no longer even novelties. ?Celebrity is greatly overrated. ?Let it go.
?
?
?


?

People who are intellectually two-dimensional see the world in two-dimensional terms: not as a rich and complex whole with which one tinkers at risk of unintended consequences, but as a pattern or schema that can be understood through a cursory examination. And, when in government, they therefore fool themselves into believing that politics is a matter, basically, of flowcharts: if X, then do Y, and Z will follow. ?- ?David McGrogan


?

On Nov 19, 2024, at 13:40, 't bill' via M-Positive <m-positive@...> wrote:

?


?

?
?

.

1.? Does Putin's comment about Trumps behavior after beomig shot impress you?

He put into words what the rest of the world thinks, and illustrated the fact that the world respects a strong, decisive and courageous leader. He invaded Ukraine because the US President was weak, but he's willing to negotiate with a strong leader. Neither surprising nor unexpected

?
*** Should be interesting to see how this plays out.? The press will go nuts when the war isn't ended on 'Day 1'.?
?

?

2.? Do you think Biden will resign so Harris can be an interim president?

Not likely. Jill won't tell him to, because she hates Harris, so he won't do it. And he shouldn't. The first woman president will be a big deal, and should be a woman worthy of the honour. A woman who is intelligent, sensible, a strong leader. Someone like Tulsi Gabbard for example. Not the awful, vacuous, incompetent, ineffective, much-hated cackler, Kamala Harris.

?
**** If Jill is in control.? Obama has been running the show so far and he mentors Kamala.? She gets into office, she pardons all the Bidens, everyone happy.
?

?

3.? Do you think the RNC should help pay off the DNC's campaign debt

Absolutely not. They spent many times as much as the Trump campaign, and went into debt buying celebrity endorsements, which may be illegal. Let them pay their own debts.

?
*** Why would they want to?? That would piss off their donors.
?

?

4.? ?Should Trump be allowed to appoint who he wants to his cabinet

?
*** Allowed?? It's his constitutional duty.? If the Senate turns one down, he picks someone else.
?

5.? LIberal women are threatening a sex strike? - is this a good thing?

A. Who cares? and B. Would any real man *want* to have sex with one of those awful blue-haired freaks?

?
**** Not me!? I'd prefer they took a vow of silence instead, but yeah, sure, knock yourselves out.??
?

?
*** TBill

?

?

Pat


?

?

--?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "M-Positive" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsubscribe@...">m-positive+unsubscribe@....
To view this discussion visit .
?

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.