Sorry, Celeste. We were discussing why I worded a question a certain way and I referred to you as my inspiration and motivation for doing so as too?literal an interpretation of the question would have bypass the fundamental point I was trying to emphasize. The point I was hoping for would involve a proactive elaboration, but my initial wording became a little convoluted after I tried to illustrate?that?I was after a broad definition of human life vs. animal life rather than a specific individual human life vs a specific individual animal's. You often toss back questions that are unclearly worded and I remembered this as I was seeking the best format for my question.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 12:17?PM a1thighmaster <thighmaster@...> wrote:
Darrell,
I honestly don't understand what your reference to me is supposed
to mean. Nor do I understand why you referenced me. Please
explain.
Aloha,
Celeste
On 3/30/2024 4:10 AM, Darrell King
wrote:
If you meant my questions, Ed, I was asking
if the3 generic human l;ife was more valuable than the
generic life of a member of another species. I was trying
to avoid Celeste's almost guaranteed qualifier, "...this
is impossible to answer since I do not know which?human or
which dog..." (Love you, Celeste!)
