Ed,
ROTFLMAO!!! Why would someone else's irrelevant opinion be a
response from you? My guess is that you are simply unable to
support you stance.
Aloha,
Celeste
On 2/19/2024 10:34 AM, Ed Lomas wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
CS
Lewis, the author and Christian theologian, was, perhaps not
surprisingly, a great advocate of reading old books. This, he
argued, forcibly reminded you that every age had its
characteristic assumptions and errors. Past controversies showed
that ¡°both sides were usually assuming without question a good
deal which we should now absolutely deny¡±, and were ¡°all the
time secretly united ... by a great mass of common assumptions¡±.
Lewis¡¯s
point was that we should try to remember the same thing would be
true of the present day, too: there would be assumptions so
widespread, so taken for granted, that they would go
unquestioned and unchallenged."
On Monday, February 19, 2024, Ed Lomas wrote:
From
900 AD to 1800 AD, there was a Medieval Warm Period followed by
the Little Ice Age.? Prior to recorded history, there were
several ice ages.? I believe the earth is going through a warm
spell, but not that it's all caused by an increase of a couple
hundred parts per million too much carbon dioxide, and that is
excess CO2 is in turn caused by wealthy people's motorcars and
jet airplanes.
On Monday, February 19, 2024, Anabel Perez wrote:
Ahh the britannica, it was one of the
"important" purchases when I was young.
As to weather change, I follow two
rules: there are some macro patterns or whatever
that have changed in the last 50 years (or less),
like receding icemarkers in Antartica, and the local
small clearly human driven changes, like
deforestation or overusage of soiles that generate
barren places in just a couple of years. Both are
easily seen by any individual that just takes a look
and verified by any number of scientific and
economical studies.
What seems to be the new discussion is
what causes the first macro changes: is it human
driven? or is a natural phase? Can we do anything
about it?
i guess it's hard to accept human
influence on a wordly scale.
When the ozone "hole" appeared in
Antartica and later closed ?did we do any of that?
Are we really causing the general
temperatures to rise (at least in Buenos Aires, it
has been over the last 100 years or so)?
I believe we are, but I guess there's
still room for faith and cherrypicking the science
that will support one explanation or the other.