Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Losmandy_users
- Messages
Search
Re: Dec vernier old Celestron G11
Dr Puzzleworth I have that "CG11" mount, perhaps even a photo somewhere of the Dec markings.? I'm on travel, but when I get home will send that or take a picture for you.? In practice,? if you have a Gemini for GoTos, you really will just want to mark where "CWD" is...and for that, putting on two white label maker triangles as arrows works well for me.?? Best, Michael? On Nov 12, 2017 1:14 PM, "puzzlewuzzle.dr@... [Losmandy_users]" <Losmandy_users@...> wrote:
|
Re: Pointing issues
Paul, I understand and the openness of Gemini.net is of great value.? ?Your authorship and maintenance and improvements of that are also a fabulous benefit. The Orion Atlas/Synta EQ6 group has a PC interface program called EQMOD that is so good, people sell off their hand controllers completely and just use that.? ?In their EQMOD pointing model method, they do model cone error and some other parameters, but as importantly, they triangulate in the region between known "align" stars, so each portion of the sky can have a unique "pointing model" for its part of the sky? (actually each star ).? Then any other object is just interpolated.? Extrapolation is used outside "align" points but that is a less certain region.? You add align stars across the sky as the need arises for new targets, which you just interpolate position.?? The Atlas mount itself is not as rigid a platform as the G11, or maybe not even as solid as the GM8.? The tripod is weak, the mount head is inadequately coupled to the tripod, the AZ and elevation adjustments are weak.? PE is worse.? But still the Atlas GoTos are rarely if ever far from their target.? There is just a conceptual difference in how the sky and mount and scope are modeled between the EQMOD and the Gemini. So...my question is:? Do you think there could be a way to do that multiple star triangulation and interpolation, using the Gemini model system.? That is, keep all the Gemini parameters zero, yet get its encoder tick positions, and then map the GoTo sky chart location to the Gemini through a PC program like EQMOD is doing? Anyway...not a short term project for sure... Best, Michael?? On Nov 12, 2017 12:20 PM, "'Derek C Breit' breit_ideas@... [Losmandy_users]" <Losmandy_users@yahoogroups.
|
Re: Pointing issues
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýFigured as much.. ? Derek ? From: Losmandy_users@... [mailto:Losmandy_users@...]
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 12:14 PM To: Losmandy_users@... Subject: RE: [Losmandy_users] Pointing issues ? ? |
Re: Pointing issues
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýFortunately you know someone who does.. ? When it gets more into the dumping rain season maybe it will magically appear on your porch.. ? Ya just never know.. ? :-)) ? Derek ? From: Losmandy_users@... [mailto:Losmandy_users@...]
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 11:57 AM To: Losmandy_users@... Subject: RE: [Losmandy_users] Pointing issues ? ? HI Derek, ? I try my best...but since I've repeated that list a few times this year...yes...it's time to make a PDF and just point to that.? I can add screen shots too... another benefit.?? ? I rely wish I had access to the source code so I could remedy or at least understand the causes of these strange pointing errors.? But...it is locked up.? Gemini2 code might be open but...I don't have one! ? Michael? ? ? ? On Nov 12, 2017 11:10 AM, "'Derek C Breit' breit_ideas@... [Losmandy_users]" <Losmandy_users@...> wrote: ? AH HA! All my ¡®problems¡¯ will disappear if I just use ¡®¡¯ ! Must be some super secret decoder ring version! ? *** typo: "" is wrong... is correct...sorry for that! ? Michael? *** ? Well Darn! :-)) ? Seriously though.. These steps you have outlined are awesome! I look forward to seeing the PDF on the Gemini 2 website so I will be able to ocate these instructions when I want to apply them.. Hint Hint! ? Derek |
Re: Pointing issues
HI Derek, I try my best...but since I've repeated that list a few times this year...yes...it's time to make a PDF and just point to that.? I can add screen shots too... another benefit.?? I rely wish I had access to the source code so I could remedy or at least understand the causes of these strange pointing errors.? But...it is locked up.? Gemini2 code might be open but...I don't have one! Michael? On Nov 12, 2017 11:10 AM, "'Derek C Breit' breit_ideas@... [Losmandy_users]" <Losmandy_users@...> wrote:
|
Re: Pointing issues
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýAH HA! All my ¡®problems¡¯ will disappear if I just use ¡®gemink.net¡¯ ! Must be some super secret decoder ring version! ? *** typo: "" is wrong... is correct...sorry for that! ? Michael? *** ? Well Darn! :-)) ? Seriously though.. These steps you have outlined are awesome! I look forward to seeing the PDF on the Gemini 2 website so I will be able to ocate these instructions when I want to apply them.. Hint Hint! ? Derek |
Re: Pointing issues
typo: "" is wrong... is correct...sorry for that! Michael? On Nov 12, 2017 7:36 AM, "Michael Herman" <mherman346@...> wrote:
|
Re: Pointing issues
Hi Doc, I find it valuable to do these steps if my pointing goes haywire.?? I am using a Gemini 1, not a Gemini 2.? They differ in hardware, but I'm not aware of any difference between the two in software algorithms.?? So try these steps to diagnose what's going on. (I use Gemini.net to more easily get to internal pointing model values.? You get that and basic ASCOM software from the ASCOM website.) 1. Using the Gemink.net Advanced window, download the internal parameters ("Read from Gemini".) Write down the existing pointing model parameter values.? I think there are about 9 of these, and they are explained in the Gemini manual.? ?Later, you will? compare the values to those of a good model.?? 2. Store the existing pointing model in a file, and name that file "Nov 12 2017 bad pointing" or something like that.?? 3. In Gemini.net, on the Advanced window,? uncheck the tick box "Synch performs additional Align ". Also inchecjk the box "PC sends to Gemini on connect" to make sure your PC, that may have bad values in its default file, does not send those to the handset. 4. Exit Gemini.net (software disconnect the Gemini from the PC...the cable can still be there.) 5. From the handset, perform a Cold Boot.? This sets all internal model values to zero. 6. Reconnect Gemini to the PC.? Use Gemini.net to Read the Mount values.? Ensure they are all zero still.? Also look at the Latitude, Longitude, Elevation, UTC date and time.? (There is a tickbox for having Gemini.net send the correct PC known date and time to the Gemini when it connects.? I do use that. )? 7. Start a sky chart on the PC that links to Gemini.net.? For that, I use both Stellarium-scope? (from Dragon-Welch computing website I think is ) and the sky chart itself Stellarium from? Stellarium.org.? ?You run Stellarium first to set its location to your site, then Save configuration, then exit.? Second, start Stellarium-scope, then select mount Gemini.net, then start Stellarium (a button on Stellarium-scope can do that).? Your Stellarium should show "scope" pointed at Polaris, if you are in positive latitude.? (You can minimize the Stellarium-scope window...just don't kill the program as it nicely links Stellarium and the Gemini.net together.? ) 8. From the handset,? use Align Telescope to go to a bright star in its list.? Sometimes, this initial point is accurate, and sometimes, for unknown reason, it will be way off.?? (I never know if this is due to old Daylight savings time change dates internal to the Gemini1 code, or why this happens... but it does even for a cold boot.? It's the weirdest thing because the mount correctly knows CWD...and time and location...how can it be so far far off in 1st star point?! ) 9. When you have centered your first Alignment star, complete handset alignment pressing the buttons that requires.? 10. Look at the Model parameters using Gemini.net.? ?They will all still be zero.? What changed?? The settings for RA and DEC offset encoder counts.?? 11. Look at the skychart.? It should show the "scope" right atop the star you aligned to. 12. Back to Gemini.net, advanced page.? Now check the tick box for "Synch performs additional Align".? That allows the Sky chart software to not only Synch the existing (all zero) model, but allows Gemini to calculate new parameter values.? ? 13. Back to the Sky chart.? Use your mouse to select a new star... (important!:) on the same side of the meridian as the first star.? (Press the spacebar to center and track that star on Stellarium.? ?) That means keep the 2nd ( and 3rd ) stars East of the meridian if the 1st star was East.? Or stars 2 and 3 must be West if the first star was West.? Use the (Control-1 in Stellarium) issue a goto from the sky chart to move the scope, then center the star on your scope with your handset.? Then on the sky chart do a Synch (Control-3 from Stellarium). Do that again for a 3rd star also same side of meridian as 1st star. 11. Now use Gemini.net "advanced" page,? Read from Gemini, and look at the model pointing parameters again.? You should see a few non-zero values.? You can save that data in a file with some name..."Model with 3 stars Nov 12 2017" etc. 12. Now use the sky chart to pick 3 stars on the opposite side of meridian.? Synch (and "Synch performs additional Align" is checked in Gemini.net) and Align to those from the sky chart.? ?Download and look at the parameter list and see more values change.?? 14. At this point,? I stop and save the model as full model for the? date.? ?Your system should accurately point to new objects around the sky.? I also Un-check the box "Synch performs additional Align " because I don't want added star's data to somehow mess up the calculations (which are a black- box to me).?? 15.? Now examine the model values.? ?How do your original "bad" model values compare? Let us know what you find....? I hope all these steps get you to a good and repeatable solution, and more enjoyment of your system. - Michael Herman? On Nov 11, 2017 6:11 PM, "lfbqtuqvokrxwkk24m2de6zj23io2kfpm5qcqt2w@... [Losmandy_users]" <Losmandy_users@...> wrote:
|
Pointing issues
Have had my G11 for about 2 years and have had pointing problems since about first 8 months in. Have had paddle and control box rehabbed twice and now both are undergoing a full reworking. I'm sure Losmandy will rehab my units appropriately but my questions are not about the fixes. I would like advice from the group on what to look for in pointing problems and what might go into correcting them. I understand it's a complex system but is there a check list of possible problems that I can look to addressing if my system encounters further issues. I have researched the web as much as I can and read the info on the Gemini 2 site but would like some guidance from the members on this as I have this feeling I'm not doing all I can to correct the problems. I have a TAK130 sitting on the G11 mount and tripod and all are in excellent operating order. Thanks, Doc |
Re: GM8 weight limits
Hi Greg,
Brrrr, I'm a southern California native, when it dips into the upper 50's we think it's going to snow LOL.? I normally don;t use the GM8 with any payloads over 30 lbs but I have had an old ribbed back orange tube C14 in the saddle and it worked fine. The old USA cast ribbed back C14s had to be 45_ lbs. ? Chip ? ?? |
Re: GM8 weight limits
Thanks, Chip.
That is an interesting concept... I suspect the rotational torque on the motors is the real issue, as well as how the motors drive the load. And static load, to start a suspended load moving, is always larger than the force needed to keep it going. Sadly, overloading a mount is depressingly obvious... one tends to find out much too late, however. In the absence of engineering data, marketing specs are such a curse... I had noticed that over time the numbers on the GM8 page had been creeping up. Had a faint hope that the driver was a tad more analytical. But thats ok... My GM8+Gemini2+recent steppers is working fine, now that I have sorted out some of the learning curve issues. Behaved much better when I ignored the 500ma spec and put in a 3amp power supply. Wished the levels that I see are built into the G11 had been done on the GM8 as well. At least the saddle... I have the parts to put that bracket on that I was asking about. But we have high winds and record cold... so I am going to stay in tonight... Regards, greg |
Re: GM8 weight limits
Greg,
I think this change was made because the lower end mounts are all rated with fictitious payloads and Losmandy conservatively rated their mounts much as AP and Bisque have always done. I have a standard GM8 with a Gemini 1 with 1st gen servomotors and it happily carries a 30+ lb. payload without any issues. For later GM8 mounts with Gemini 2-minis and the latest high torque motors this seems to be a more realistic payload rating though I would think for imaging the original 30lb. payload limit would net better results at longer focal lengths with a big refractor loaded in the saddle.?? Chip? |
Re: GM8 DEC axis head... depth of blind holes for attaching saddle...
Hi Bill,
My bad! The topic read GM8 and my brain left off the '11' in the body text. Yes, the GM811 will not have the same mechanical interference issues as a standard servomotor GM8 and the clearances will be almost the same as the full boat G11G which the Rayox works great with. I have a GM8 and G11. Scott rebuilt my G11 several months ago into a fully optioned G11G and I have also played with several different Rayox prototypes as they were developed over the last year into the extremely nice final production version saddle. Anyway, as I recall most fasteners in this class are good to go as long as you engage at least as many threads deep as the major diameter of the fastener so I think you should be okay to grind or file 20-30 thousandths off the end or just buy a shorter fastener. But if you are worried about maximum strength hand fit the screw to keep as many threads as possible but I would not worry about it too much as even a single standard quality Grade-5 1/4-20 fastener has a pretty high strength in shear which is how they are loaded in this application.? Chip ? .? ? ?? |
GM8 weight limits
I noticed today that the product page for the GM8 now shows 30 to 40 pounds (??) based on the OTA configuration. Is there some information about what the variables are?? I would guess, but might be wrong, that a short, heavy RC reflector might be ok but a long refractor not, thinking about the possible rotational torques. Thanks, greg latiak avalon observatory ? |