¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Very odd polar align issue

 

It also should be clear tonight and a lot less worse than last night - it was insufferably hot and the seeing looked terrible.

I think what I can do tonight, is
- Reset PHD to all defaults?
- Re-calibrate?
- Re-slew the mount away from the trees back to the meridian/equator
- GA
- Re-slew the mount away from the trees back to the meridian/equator
- Guide until I hit the trees (hopefully at least 20 mins)
- Re-slew the mount away from the trees back to the meridian/equator
- Run GA as long as possible to see how the mount itself looks


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

>>>After noticing this could be the problem I restarted everything, did a 3 star modeling, and the plate solve worked like a charm after that.?

?

well most Losmandy imagers who are doing plate solving don't use any gemini modeling (myself included). so I'm wondering if it's covering up some incorrect setting somewhere

?

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:22 AM "Guilherme V¨ºnere <venere@...> wrote:
Hello all

I tested yesterday with parameters set according to the XLS shared by Edward, and (almost) everything worked fine. The flip happened at expected time and the image after flip was just fine. No more runway goto/park as I've seen before.

Now, the "almost" above is related to the Plate Solve i've been doing and how Gemini apparently works. I've been using OnStep on my GM8 for a couple years and I never had to do any modeling before the session. I would just goto first object, do a plate solve and sync and everything would work just fine after. I've been doing the same with Gemini, but apparently it doesn't like that when?there's no model previously saved.

During my session yesterday, when I tried to do the plate solve, NINA would increasingly move AWAY from the object instead of closer. it tried 10+ times before it failed, and that's where i guess it would go to that park position i mentioned before.?

After noticing this could be the problem I restarted everything, did a 3 star modeling, and the plate solve worked like a charm after that.?

Guilherme


On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 4:01 PM Edward Plumer <eplumer@...> wrote:

Change the log to "TRACE" level for the next time. It is not too verbose for a night of use.

--
Edward



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: Very odd polar align issue

 

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:21 AM, Brian Valente wrote:
This log is as close as I could get to the baseline. I could not get 30 mins and you can see toward the end, I touched the mount to tape off the cable, causing a spike


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

Hello all

I tested yesterday with parameters set according to the XLS shared by Edward, and (almost) everything worked fine. The flip happened at expected time and the image after flip was just fine. No more runway goto/park as I've seen before.

Now, the "almost" above is related to the Plate Solve i've been doing and how Gemini apparently works. I've been using OnStep on my GM8 for a couple years and I never had to do any modeling before the session. I would just goto first object, do a plate solve and sync and everything would work just fine after. I've been doing the same with Gemini, but apparently it doesn't like that when?there's no model previously saved.

During my session yesterday, when I tried to do the plate solve, NINA would increasingly move AWAY from the object instead of closer. it tried 10+ times before it failed, and that's where i guess it would go to that park position i mentioned before.?

After noticing this could be the problem I restarted everything, did a 3 star modeling, and the plate solve worked like a charm after that.?

Guilherme


On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 4:01 PM Edward Plumer <eplumer@...> wrote:

Change the log to "TRACE" level for the next time. It is not too verbose for a night of use.

--
Edward


Re: Very odd polar align issue

 

>>> 1. Calibration/GA indicate 3-3.5 seconds of backlash and I should guide only in one direction

the GA analysis of a spring-loaded worm is often not accurate. I would focus on your guiding results. I'm guessing your DEC is not the constraining factor right now

>>>2. My RA guiding is not where I want it to be. I am not sure if this is my guide cam scale is just not good enough (6.4 arc sec/pxl) or something else

At this point it sounds like you should be moving into optimizing your guiding. i can look at your logs, but best if you did a baseline guiding. It's the basics, but often times issues are introduced in how you set up PHD and tweak parameters. a baseline makes sure you follow all the defaults so we know nothing strange was introduce.





On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:13 AM Nick Ambrose <nick.a.ambrose@...> wrote:
Thanks Brian,

The good news is that my PA was solid all night, remaining around 0.5-1.0 through all my testing.

I still have two issues that I need to figure out.

1. Calibration/GA indicate 3-3.5 seconds of backlash and I should guide only in one direction
2. My RA guiding is not where I want it to be. I am not sure if this is my guide cam scale is just not good enough (6.4 arc sec/pxl) or something else

DEC guiding was awesome all night despite the reports of backlash. Generally around 0.1px (~0.6-0.7 arc secs). There were relatively infrequent corrections and I was really happy. Not sure what can be done about the backlash and if that is affecting RA guiding

RA guiding was generally 1.0-1.3 ish overnight, which is higher than I was expecting. I was not able to get a full 20 min log because when I calibrate at the meridian/equator, the scope moves through a bunch of trees (I kept resetting back and so could do multiple runs)

Toward the end of the night, I did adjust the weight more eastward (even though we should not need to do that) - although with the weight of my rig, it was generally still balanced. This did not seem to really help

What eventually did get the guiding down was to set the PHD exposure to 1.0 seconds (I tried 2.0. 3.0 and 4.0 with no changes)
Once I set it to 1.0, I saw an immediate change. Unfortunately it was almost 3am so I didn't have time to run it for long, but RA got down to around 0.8 which is a much better number

I'm uploading some logs to see if there is anything obvious in them. In a couple, there is a spike halfway through as I touched the mount to try to change the weight balance, or check for snags

There are no real cable snags, but at one point my data/power cables were rubbing on the RA motor cable. I taped that off to the mount (which caused some of the spikes), but id did not seem to make any real difference



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: Very odd polar align issue

 

Thanks Brian,

The good news is that my PA was solid all night, remaining around 0.5-1.0 through all my testing.

I still have two issues that I need to figure out.

1. Calibration/GA indicate 3-3.5 seconds of backlash and I should guide only in one direction
2. My RA guiding is not where I want it to be. I am not sure if this is my guide cam scale is just not good enough (6.4 arc sec/pxl) or something else

DEC guiding was awesome all night despite the reports of backlash. Generally around 0.1px (~0.6-0.7 arc secs). There were relatively infrequent corrections and I was really happy. Not sure what can be done about the backlash and if that is affecting RA guiding

RA guiding was generally 1.0-1.3 ish overnight, which is higher than I was expecting. I was not able to get a full 20 min log because when I calibrate at the meridian/equator, the scope moves through a bunch of trees (I kept resetting back and so could do multiple runs)

Toward the end of the night, I did adjust the weight more eastward (even though we should not need to do that) - although with the weight of my rig, it was generally still balanced. This did not seem to really help

What eventually did get the guiding down was to set the PHD exposure to 1.0 seconds (I tried 2.0. 3.0 and 4.0 with no changes)
Once I set it to 1.0, I saw an immediate change. Unfortunately it was almost 3am so I didn't have time to run it for long, but RA got down to around 0.8 which is a much better number

I'm uploading some logs to see if there is anything obvious in them. In a couple, there is a spike halfway through as I touched the mount to try to change the weight balance, or check for snags

There are no real cable snags, but at one point my data/power cables were rubbing on the RA motor cable. I taped that off to the mount (which caused some of the spikes), but id did not seem to make any real difference


Re: Very odd polar align issue

 

>>>I do have one more question - the TVC parameter on the mount is set to 5 (it came that way)
My understanding is it needs to be zero. Should I change it and re-calibrate and redo guide assist ?

you can leave it at the default for now. Regardless, changing TVC value does not require you to re-calibrate

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:13 PM Nick Ambrose <nick.a.ambrose@...> wrote:
I want to truly thank everyone for their help here. I have figured out at least the initial error.

I went back to "debugging school" and started going one step at a time
Used Sharpcap to align, then aligned the "other" way ... alignment went excellent -> poor
Did it 2-3 more times, same result.
Put a flashlight on the rig and noticed two things

1/ (probably minor) - tiny bit of play in DEC - resolved by tightening the clutch
2/ Smoking gun .... when I attached the OTA to the plate, the screws of the focuser got in the way of doing it the way I wanted. I loosened the ring on the scope to try to get it to fit but it still wouldn't Turns out i never tightened that up fully and there was wiggle

I got a wrench on the knurled knob of the ring and clamped it down and now PA at least is solid in Sharpcap no matter what side I start from

Now i am going through the PHD baseline to see what that shows ( I reset defaults in the PHD algorithms page)

I do have one more question - the TVC parameter on the mount is set to 5 (it came that way)
My understanding is it needs to be zero. Should I change it and re-calibrate and redo guide assist ?



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: Help Debug New GM811G

 

Jason,

The only thing I might add here is to perhaps switch back to a guide scope and guide camera for a bit. While OAG is more accurate in the long run, it might be trickier to start out with. With new equipment often the simplest arrangement is best for analysis and debugging. Once you get the tweaking and adjustments more in tune, then go back to OAG.?

John


Re: Very odd polar align issue

 

I want to truly thank everyone for their help here. I have figured out at least the initial error.

I went back to "debugging school" and started going one step at a time
Used Sharpcap to align, then aligned the "other" way ... alignment went excellent -> poor
Did it 2-3 more times, same result.
Put a flashlight on the rig and noticed two things

1/ (probably minor) - tiny bit of play in DEC - resolved by tightening the clutch
2/ Smoking gun .... when I attached the OTA to the plate, the screws of the focuser got in the way of doing it the way I wanted. I loosened the ring on the scope to try to get it to fit but it still wouldn't Turns out i never tightened that up fully and there was wiggle

I got a wrench on the knurled knob of the ring and clamped it down and now PA at least is solid in Sharpcap no matter what side I start from

Now i am going through the PHD baseline to see what that shows ( I reset defaults in the PHD algorithms page)

I do have one more question - the TVC parameter on the mount is set to 5 (it came that way)
My understanding is it needs to be zero. Should I change it and re-calibrate and redo guide assist ?


Re: Changing the servo motor encoders from 256 to 512 or 1024. Any reason not to do this?

 

Jason:

They are nice handset holsters,...cleverly fabricated to be flexible by 3D printer of plastic.??

To get them contact:

Warren Schultz
136 Torrey Heights Ln
Durham, NC 27703

His email is

handset holsters?were at the time:
?~$30 each

I had him make me one for Gemini-2,
And 2 more for Gemini-1 units.? They are quite useful.

Very best,
Michael





On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, 6:30 PM Jason Close <jason@...> wrote:
Hey Michael,

How can I get one of those hand controller mounts that attaches to HD tripod??

Jason


Re: Help Debug New GM811G

 

Hi all - just wanted to say thanks for all the previous advice.? I've been dialing in some things, but it¡¯s been very slow going between blistering heat here, less than ideal skies, and work.? I'll post some more detailed updates in time, but for now would like to report I can now get consistently below 1" RMS error, but not often below 0.8"-0.9" over sustained periods.? The biggest culprit is the 76s error, followed by the 32s error. (The only mechanical change I've made is adjusting the dec SLW spring and offset screws). It tracks pretty well in very short periods until it hits those two errors and then they get fed into the total RMS error...? Thanks again everyone for your time to give me feedback.

Jason


Re: Changing the servo motor encoders from 256 to 512 or 1024. Any reason not to do this?

 

Hey Michael,

How can I get one of those hand controller mounts that attaches to HD tripod??

Jason


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 


Change the log to "TRACE" level for the next time. It is not too verbose for a night of use.

--
Edward


Re: Changing the servo motor encoders from 256 to 512 or 1024. Any reason not to do this?

 

Yes I have seen many pictures of Michael¡¯s set up. I have already reported him for crimes against nature :-)

But as I recall he primarily does planetary imaging which is a whole different kind of tracking requirement.

He just bought a G 11 T as well

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 2:35 PM pcboreland via <pcboreland=[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:12 PM, Brian Valente wrote:
i wasn't sure if your dob was for imaging or visual, if visual it would be fine
?
Brian,

Strictly imaging. Did you see the pictures Michael posted earlier of him setup? Look at those weights!

Peter

--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: Changing the servo motor encoders from 256 to 512 or 1024. Any reason not to do this?

 

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:12 PM, Brian Valente wrote:
i wasn't sure if your dob was for imaging or visual, if visual it would be fine
?
Brian,

Strictly imaging. Did you see the pictures Michael posted earlier of him setup? Look at those weights!

Peter


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 01:09 PM, Jim Waters wrote:
I wish the sky was clear so actual testing can be done.? We have had smoke from wildfires and/or monsoon weather for the past 2 plus weeks.
Sky is clear this evening here in NJ so will try out the new settings.

Peter


Re: Considering a GM811G

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I¡¯d assume you¡¯re doing medium-FL imaging, given the description of the telescope. ?With that, I really doubt you¡¯d see a difference between the GM811GHD and G11G. ?In simple terms, the G11G is 20% heavier and has a 20% greater load rating, while costing 10% more. ?If portability is a factor for you, then the lighter GM811GHD might be worthwhile. ?Otherwise, the sturdier mount is a good investment and should serve you well if you go to a longer focal length setup.?

? -Les



On 28 Jun 2021, at 12:43, Vishal Billa <vishal.n.billa@...> wrote:

Thanks Chip, Alan, and Dwight for your input. This is pretty much what I expected to hear but it's nice to be able to confirm my suspicions with people who are much more experienced with these mounts. The general consensus from this post and my other research seems that the G8 (or G8 dec axis on the G811) can handle the 130 for visual fine but for imaging I'm giong to want the extra sturdiness of the G11.?As for the tripod, I am definitely going for the Losmandy HD tripod with whichever mount I get. I have heard excellent things about the Berlebach Planet tripods, however a G11 with all the bells and whistles is already getting to the high end of my budget so I can manage with the included tripod for now. Looks like I'll be on the hunt for a G11 now.?

Thanks,
Vishal


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

Jim Waters
 

I will try the new 'Smart Meridian Flip' plug-in later today and post the results.??

I wish the sky was clear so actual testing can be done.? We have had smoke from wildfires and/or monsoon weather for the past 2 plus weeks.


------------------------
Jim W
Phoenix, AZ. USA

Losmandy GM811G, NINA 1.11, ASI2600MC Pro, Sky-Watcher Scopes


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 


Yeah, those are nightly builds of 1.11 I listed and have used ... I just have not tried all of them ;-)? ?I have not done anything with the released version 1.10 because I needed dome control and wanted to use the advanced sequencer. I have had MF work with both the Simple and Advanced sequencer with my settings but have mostly used the Advanced sequencer.

--
Edward


Re: Considering a GM811G

 

Thanks Chip, Alan, and Dwight for your input. This is pretty much what I expected to hear but it's nice to be able to confirm my suspicions with people who are much more experienced with these mounts. The general consensus from this post and my other research seems that the G8 (or G8 dec axis on the G811) can handle the 130 for visual fine but for imaging I'm giong to want the extra sturdiness of the G11.?As for the tripod, I am definitely going for the Losmandy HD tripod with whichever mount I get. I have heard excellent things about the Berlebach Planet tripods, however a G11 with all the bells and whistles is already getting to the high end of my budget so I can manage with the included tripod for now. Looks like I'll be on the hunt for a G11 now.?

Thanks,
Vishal