Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Losmandy_users
- Messages
Search
Stall and Control box
On startup, either cold or warm, my GM8 Gemini 1 has a motor stall.?
I swap in a different control box (from my other Gemini 1 mount) and there is no motor stall.? Then, I swap in the first control box, and the mount operates fine.? Next night I come back and that same control box has a stall on startup.? IN other words, something on startup stalls the motor with one box, but not the other. And, once I use the second box, the first box will work properly. Any ideas? Alex |
Re: Bellville question
Here's an extreme example of the problem. This is a worm block commonly found in up market Celestron Nexstar mounts made in the first decade of the 2000s, like the Nexstar GPS Alt/Az and CGE mounts.?
While playing with on of these I notice there was a lot of play in the worm. Tightening the adjustment screw until the play disappeared produced a horrid notchiness like a out of round tire.? Digging into the design of the block, this what I discovered. The block is one piece. In order to assemble it one end was bored to let the worm and the adjustment en bearing pass through it. The outer diameter of the worm is larger than the bearing fitted to it. Thus the bearing is left to float around in its seat.? |
Re: Bellville question
Hi Tom,
The reason the Belleville discs improve PE is that they force the bearings to rotate in a predictable way with the motion of the worm. Left to their own devices the ball bearings tend to stall then start again in unpredictable ways likely when the clearances are taken up by misalignment in the worm and bearings. Placing a light load on bearings is a well documented mechanical engineering practice for precision mechanisms and many bearing manufacturers have engineering notes on the practice. That is how I found out about this many years ago when I applied the idea to my HEQ5-Pro/Sirius and EQ6/Atlas mounts 6-7 years ago back in my EQMOD says.? Another good idea I had but didn't try due to updating to OPWs was to fix the worm blocks to the worm cover to in essence make the cover a rigid bridge between the blocks to make backlash easier to do. The way to do this would be to use a pin on the top and cut a slight recess under the existing grub screws on the cover to set the blocks in the cover well aligned with the outer bearing which is being preloaded by the Bellevue disc. By bridging the blocks they would move as one making backlash easier to set well. The other thing to try to achieve is to locate the gearbox output shaft as closely on axis as possible with the worm shaft.?? -- Chip Louie - Chief Daydreamer Imagination Hardware |
Re: Ovision worm on new G11G
Hi Sabastian, I have old G11 (2005) non goto, later fitted with onstep. Used ovision on this one for a long time. Everythig just works nicely for Photography. Now going for a new G11G. Was planning to fit ovision worm from old mount on to the new mount just incase there was any benefit.? Thanks Brian for replying.? I think then I will first check the performance of new mount then will take a call on swapping the gear. Regards, Nilesh Desai On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, 12:34 am Brian Valente, <bvalente@...> wrote:
|
Re: How to adjust AR and DEC worms ?
Keith N
Hi Thomas.? Here's what I do with the two-bearing-block configuration:
Keith |
Re: Sidereal vs King rate
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSonny,You can live in a democracy and still have a King or a Queen for that matter, they are not mutually exclusive :) Paul
|
Re: Ovision worm on new G11G
Hi Sebastian Personally I think the current shipping mounts are as good or better than ovision (particularly with factory-stock spring loaded worm) Brian On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:20 AM Sebastian Kotulski <sebkotulski@...> wrote: I think ,? Ovision worm block is no more available. --
Brian? Brian Valente portfolio |
Re: Sidereal vs King rate
Hi Jamie it's kind of six of one, half dozen of another generally most folks use sidereal. King Rate accounts for atmospheric refraction but isn't terribly helpful if you are imaging higher in the sky (>30 degrees?)? Guiding usually takes care of any changes in apparent star motion as well On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:21 PM Jamie Amendolagine <jamie.amendolagine@...> wrote: So which choice is better for imaging? Or are there situations where one is better than the other?? --
Brian? Brian Valente portfolio |
Meridian flip with N.I.N.A
Hello,?
i changed from SGP to N.I.N.A because it's free and a good concept! The last two nights i tested N.I.N.A.?and shoot some images of M57; most of the things are really working fine. The only thing that's not running is the meridian flip with my G11/Gemini II: N.I.N.A.?'runs' though the meridian flip sequence and act as if the mount has flipped, plate solve etc. but the mount will not flip to other side!!! Any ideas what is missing, see my Gemini II and NINA-Settings? Thanks for help Dietmar |
Re: Going Auto with N.I.N.A
Hallo SonnyE,
i also changed from SGP to N.I.N.A. and i also went through the videos from CUIV; very helpful at the beginning because several things have to be configured in several diffent places. For me not so intuitive as SGP; but i like the concept and that it's free. The last two nights i tested N.I.N.A.?an shoot some images of M57; most of the things are working fine. The only thing that's NOT running is the meridian flip with my G11/Gemini II: N.I.N.A.?'runs' though the meridian flip sequence and act as if the mount has flipped, plate solve etc. and the mount will move slightly to the position prior to where I originally centered the object but will not flip to other side!!! Did you try a meridian flip or any ideas what is missing? Dietmar |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss