Re: Usability Question--Update
|
>>>
If accurately polar aligned (within 30 arc seconds)?and synced on West and on East all objects should appear within a low power eyepiece.? ?Assuming the mount axis are ridgid and set perpendicular. And assuming the West side and East side offsets correct for the saddle/tube cone error.
Good thought, but more accurately there needs to be a model built on both sides.?
The model can compensate for polar alignment, flexure, non-perpendicularity (which is what I assume when you mention cone error) provided you do enough alignments. It's all there in the model parameters screen on the hand controller
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:16 PM WayBack < corey_d@...> wrote: [Edited Message Follows]
I'm new to the G11G too.? I agree with your approach and with Brian's thought too.? Just sharing some personal nuances and hope you don't mind.
If accurately polar aligned (within 30 arc seconds)?and synced on West and on East all objects should appear within a low power eyepiece.? ?Assuming the mount axis are ridgid and set perpendicular. And assuming the West side and East side offsets correct for the saddle/tube cone error.
-- Brian?
Brian Valente astro portfolio? portfolio astrobin?
|
