Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Re: What result I can get with the current OPW in my old G11?
Andre, You are not buying a Rolls Royce or a Bentley auto, or an AP or 10-Micron, etc. mount. You are buying a stock mount.? Each mount maker has its own unique design qualities that set it apart from the rest of the market.?? You must assess the suitability of the mount you bought for your purposes -- your telescope, your camera, your imaging desires for perfection. If you find the stock mount does not meet your expectations, you can either ? ?do not make any changes and return it for a refund ? ?decide to upgrade its parts to more superior ones The stock G11 or GM8 mount does not have any guarantee on its PE.? It does not have any published spec on its worm bearings or other parts. The mounts vary in performance.? The mounts are not all tested by the factory under the stars for PE performance.? Many owners have obtained about 1 arcsec RMS PE on their G11 mounts, and about 2X that for the GM8 drive.? I would say this is proven...possible, but not guaranteed.?? ?? In this group, other owners are explaining what we have done to obtain superior performance from our stock mounts. That is why you see a large variation in approaches, with new gearboxes, bearings, lubricants, adjustments, and even homemade OPW systems and stepper motor systems.?? This is considered by us owners to be another of the great challenges of this hobby.?? Do not take any advice as gospel; your mount may have a different issue than other owners have faced, or it may have the same common issues that many mounts have experienced.? However, the company does change its designs, as its website says "
ALL SPECIFICATIONS MAY AND WILL CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE? "?? The stock parts that Losmandy offers are also subject to design changes.? For example, the original OPW was long, bolted on the gearbox, and had 3 worm bearings.? Later OPW were shorter, have 2 bearings, and do not attach the gearbox.? Still later mounts came tucked motors and after that came the SLW spring loaded worm version.? Each modification in design was intended to solve some prior issue.? ?We know that new changes have good intentions.? Only testing can show if those intentions are realized.?? For those with considerably more financial resources, there are mounts of much higher precision available, at their cost point. Enjoy the many challenges of this great hobby.? I would not expect perfection from any mount, any telescope, any camera, or any software.? New products and new inventions come on the market regularly.? If there were a perfect unit, there would be no further inventions.?? Perfection lies in the future...not the present.? You are part of the future improvements if you find better approaches than those reported already. Stay well and enjoy the journey forward, Michael On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 7:44 AM GuitsBoy <guitsboy@...> wrote:
--
|