¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Spikes!


 

haha well i'll say it one more time?

"this doesn't directly address your question, but i think having a solid foundation is an important first step here"

Fixing symptoms with unknown?causes is always a process of elimination right? if we knew what it was, we'd just jump to the fix. But 99% of the effort is isolating the cause. So it makes sense to me that we want to make sure everything else is operating correctly, and eliminate one thing at a time

that's also why I mentioned the previous steps of doing an unguided run. if it shows up in the unguided results, we know it's the mount. if it's not we know it's not the mount, or at least not the mount by itself

i like your idea of testing without the SCT

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 2:12 PM Jamie Amendolagine <jamie.amendolagine@...> wrote:
I made a habit of making large steps for calibration sometime ago, and I honestly can't remember exactly why I did that... I think that PHD was complaining that my steps were too small, so I just increased them. I'll try and dial it in better tonight, but honestly I don't see how the calibration can account for the spikes, and that's my biggest issue.?

Jamie



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.