yes i saw the good guiding there, both axis contributing roughly equal
so that's something you'll want to watch for. If it ends up that you improve DEC considerably, you want to make sure RA is keeping up, which is why i suggested PPEC
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:28 AM Arun Hegde <arun.k.hegde@...> wrote:
Thanks, Brian and thanks Paul.
Yes, I always do the calibration close to the intersection of the equator and meridian because the apparent motion of stars is greatest there which would mean a good calibration. You'll see it was done at RA =14 hours and DEC=-7.8. Not exactly at the intersection, but pretty close to it!
The first thing I did when I started guiding was turn TVC to 0. However, I entirely neglected to turn on backlash compensation in PHD2 - the results were good enough without it. I assumed I had it set, but never checked! I did watch part of Bruce Waddington's excellent video yesterday and plan to finish it tonight. The first thing I looked for the shape of the RA curve when I ran GA and was happy to see that the PE seemed low.?
Brian - the reason I changed the exposure time lower was because it seemed to help with the amplitude of DEC guiding, but again, I only observed it over a short period of time.??
What I will say is this - when I checked PHD2 this morning, I was pleased to see that the last part of the guiding seemed very stable with an RMS of 0.69" over a fairly extended period of time. I'll follow your recommendations on PPEC and DEC backlash and report. I expect based on this and also Jamie's observations below that DEC backlash compensation will make a significant difference.