开云体育

The speaker plug is shown at 9:41 in this video: https://youtu.be/O9_EPONtwXA

Hi guys, from what I read in the manual, the supplied mic is supposed to have an external speaker plug. I'm still awaiting my TX-500, so I cannot confirm on the hardware, though. vy73 de Robert

Henry, thanks I had not thought of that, but I wanted to use a non powered speaker, guess I could make some sort of adapter to split the speaker out but appears pretty cumbersome, Geoff

Geoff, I was thinking about that same setup earlier today. There is audio out (pin 3) from the REM DATA port, thus you should be able to drive a powered speaker. I will be trying that

Awaiting delivery of my TX500 from HRO, and need to know can I use an external speaker and the supplied mic at the same time? It appears to me that is not feasible with the connectors I see, looking

Hello Glen, I believe the answers to your questions #2 and #3 are given on page 18 of the English manual. "To control the PTT function of the power amplifier, you must connect pin 2 (PTT OUT), open

Doesn't sound like this radio is one you should consider Elan..... es vy 73 om de "baab" w9ya <elanpaim@...> wrote:

Hi Glen I can only answer #1 Yes I did. Wiring is exactly like you descibed it. Went without any problems. I set the output of the soundcard to about 50% and then increased the mic gain so that the

Thank you to the folks who responded to my questions/concerns about the receiver in the TX-500.? I also realize that these are not going to be high performance rigs, being so small, and mostly for

I did they not answer

Hi Elan I had email contact with the support twice. In both cases they answered within a couple of hours. 73, Stephan -- DF6PA Licensed since 1978 TX-500, KX2, IC-703,

Elan, I had a question concerning CAT support and got an useful answer within a day. Now it works. 73 de Axel, DL7VEA. Elan Paim via groups.io <elanpaim@...> schrieb am Di.

Elan, You can reach TX-500 support at: support@... I am aware of two successful communications with that address. 73, Henry - K4TMC [email protected]> wrote:

Who ever have this radio will never tell you it’s a bad radio we all like to believe it is the best ever made However still no company answer no support no company owner name no nothing well

Hey all; Yeppers...I agree. The numbers "game" can lead to problems comparing rigs. It can help to remember, if asked, Mr. Sherwood will ALSO explain that there are rigs with great "numbers" that

I made a test this evening on 40 m. Collected FT8 signals over 15 minutes with my TS570 (not the best RX, I know) and the TX500. I know, this is not a measurement! The antenna was the same end feed

Paul, Great information! Should be required reading by anyone considering a new radio. Oh no...I must be older...I use to think the higher number of 'tubes' made the better radio! 73, Henry -

Sherwood has repeatedly said that for competition-grade receivers, close-space DR of 80 dB is adequate for all but the most hostile environments (e.g., Field Day and other co-locate situations). See

Stephan, The most disappointing test numbers to me are the Dynamic Range both wide (79 db) and narrow (79 db) spaced. However, I am not sure how this will play out during a contest with the TX-500.

Hi Henry, I'm just curious about which numbers are not good. The 2uV is without pre-amplifier and is 0.23uV when it is enabled. This single value is comparable to FlexRadio 6400 (pretty at the top)