Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
Check out
https://bhi-ltd.com/markets/amateur-radio.html
Steve Isaacs
By
steve isaacs
·
#431
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
There is no file storage in basic groups created after a certain date, and this
is one of those groups.
Donald KX8K
<sernstfortin@...> wrote:
By
Donald Hellen
·
#430
·
|
TS680s Knob
Good morning!
I am seeking the M CH/VFO CH knob for the Kenwood TS 680s. Does anyone happen to have one they are willing to part with?
Thank you!
Frank D
KC1CAB
By
Frank D
·
#429
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
Just to let everyone know where I am, attached one can find a 14page document with lots of pictures and helpful supplemental information on construction, use and modification of the DSPham project by
By
Samuel W7STF
·
#428
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
Sounds interesting (pun intended). I’m in.
73
Steve Isaacs KO4IVH
By
steve isaacs
·
#427
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
Russ, thus far, pretty good. So I have a TS-570DG and TS-890S that I am trying it with. (yes, I know, both have MPUs for doing signal processing and NR).
I find the NR, NB and Morse decode functions
By
Samuel W7STF
·
#425
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
How effective is it, in your opinion? How does it compare to other commercial units you've tried?
By
Russ W
·
#424
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
I have 3 radios that could benefit from such a thing: a 520, an 830, and an FT 101b. I have only basic experience with an arduino. ?A project like this would certainly be of interest!
73,
Tom ai4th
By
Tom ai4th
·
#423
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
Doug, And Frank.
The hardest aspect of the project for me was my lack of recent experience with the Arduino development environment. I received some handholding from Graham.
However, now I could
By
Samuel W7STF
·
#422
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
I would be interested in learning more.
By
Frank Swindler Jr.
·
#421
·
|
Re: Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
I’m interested in this project. I have a TS 530 SP that would enjoy it!
Is the build complex? I have some experience but am at best an intermediate
builder.
73,
Doug N0MM
[email protected]>
By
Doug N?MM
·
#420
·
|
Any Interest in adding Digital Signal Processing Noise Reduction to an older Kenwood Transceiver?
I'm experimenting with this technology.
I am attempting to assess if anyone would be interested in my experience constructing an Arduino-based DSP Noise Reduction implementation by Graham Whaley.
One
By
Samuel W7STF
·
#419
·
|
Re: HT whip antenna
Thanks, Charlie, I'll wade through the "ham slang".
By the way, my OEM whip has decent return loss figures. Too bad the replacement cost is $134.
--
-
Regards, Karl Shoemaker
To contact me, please
By
K7SRG
·
#418
·
|
Re: HT whip antenna
It's another .io group:
ham-antennas.groups.io
main groups.io Group <#>
Discussion of amateur radio antenna systems, feedlines, matching networks, and related topics. Anything and everything, tell
By
Charlie Fellenbaum - WB4FAW
·
#417
·
|
Re: HT whip antenna
Lou,? I have not found any "antenna groups" yet. I guess I missed something.
--
-
Regards, Karl Shoemaker
To contact me, please visit SRG's web site at http://www.srgclub.org
for the current email
By
K7SRG
·
#416
·
|
Kenwood TS570 swr circuit issue
Picked up a used TS570SG recently.? It is a nice radio overall.? However, t he SWR circuit doesn't seem to be working correctly.? It never shows higher than a 1.5 SWR, even with no load
By
John Geiger AF5CC
·
#415
·
|
Re: HT whip antenna
https://signalstuff.com
By
Rusty Travis
·
#414
·
|
Re: HT whip antenna
I completely agree. Kenwood ships their radios with the best antennas suited for them.
Gary
By
Gary Cook
·
#413
·
|
Re: HT whip antenna
Why not stick with what came with the radio? Every Kenwood I've had worked great with the original antenna.
I still use the original on the G71 I have. The F6 I had to replace because I caught it in a
By
Jim Barbour
·
#412
·
|
Re: HT whip antenna
Have you tried any of the antenna groups?
Lou WA5LOU
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Lou WA5LOU
·
#411
·
|