开云体育

Date

Re: Leeboard / Luffboard

 

开云体育

John:
??? It's on this group's website in the files area, and consists of two PDFs called Lufboard1 and Lufboard2.?? Here's the URL to the files area:



??

? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? H.W.


On 11/28/2017 10:16 AM, j.hess@... [k-designs] wrote:

?

What is the URL for the luffboard pdf you mentioned?

Thanks, John



---In k-designs@..., wrote :

Bernd:

??? ?? I ran across the "luffboard" pdfs the other day, an interesting
addition to the KD860, a much better option than a dagger board or
centerboard, and ironically it reflects the thought that always crosses
my mind when I see photos of cats with daggerboards, which I consider
too vulnerable.? Richard Woods for example offers the option of
daggerboards or mini keels, one too vulnerable to damage, and the other
reduces the draft too much.

??? On a hull with the shape of the KD860, it's a natural solution,
because the support is relatively simple.??? Leeboards are an excellent
solution for sailing craft, but tend to be ugly and look like an
afterthought, due to the need to angle them outward to get the desired
effectiveness.?? On a multihull, with it's narrow hull as compared to
monohulls, and broad beam........ and shallow heel angle, it makes
excellent sense to simply follow the hull on the inboard side like this.

??? Your outside the box thought process very much reminds me of the
engineer I greatly admired when I was in my teens.... Buckminster
Fuller.?? His solutions were based on reason and logic, with a touch of
brilliance, rather than on convention. Other teens were obsessed with
rock stars, movie stars, and sports heroes........... I would have given
my eye teeth to have had the chance to sit at Buckminster Fuller's feet,
and hopefully to absorb some of that brilliance.

??? I'm wondering if any KD860's have been built with these luffboards,
and how they have worked out.??? They are not deep, but an asymmetric
foil operating in water can produce a lot of force.


??????????????????????????????????????????? H.W.



build times: specifically Eco5.5

 

Hi all, thought I would mention the above subject as there has been some discussion on it recently. you know, taking the time you need , enjoying the process etc, etc.?


But I thought maybe to point out here Bernd, that over on the Duckworks facebook site they have obviously mis quoted you on this since , on that nice presentation of the Eco cat, and the pics of Hamish's boat that his build time has been well over 2 years, not the 9 months they quoted there. I've been following his build and visited with him a few times, so I know approximately how long he has been on it.?


Anyhow, a very nice article about the boat.I really like that design. It's kind of like the big brother to the Jigsaw.


regards

Bryan


Re: Leeboard / Luffboard

 

What is the URL for the luffboard pdf you mentioned?

Thanks, John


---In k-designs@..., <owly@...> wrote :

Bernd:

??? ?? I ran across the "luffboard" pdfs the other day, an interesting
addition to the KD860, a much better option than a dagger board or
centerboard, and ironically it reflects the thought that always crosses
my mind when I see photos of cats with daggerboards, which I consider
too vulnerable.? Richard Woods for example offers the option of
daggerboards or mini keels, one too vulnerable to damage, and the other
reduces the draft too much.

??? On a hull with the shape of the KD860, it's a natural solution,
because the support is relatively simple.??? Leeboards are an excellent
solution for sailing craft, but tend to be ugly and look like an
afterthought, due to the need to angle them outward to get the desired
effectiveness.?? On a multihull, with it's narrow hull as compared to
monohulls, and broad beam........ and shallow heel angle, it makes
excellent sense to simply follow the hull on the inboard side like this.

??? Your outside the box thought process very much reminds me of the
engineer I greatly admired when I was in my teens.... Buckminster
Fuller.?? His solutions were based on reason and logic, with a touch of
brilliance, rather than on convention. Other teens were obsessed with
rock stars, movie stars, and sports heroes........... I would have given
my eye teeth to have had the chance to sit at Buckminster Fuller's feet,
and hopefully to absorb some of that brilliance.

??? I'm wondering if any KD860's have been built with these luffboards,
and how they have worked out.??? They are not deep, but an asymmetric
foil operating in water can produce a lot of force.


??????????????????????????????????????????? H.W.


Re: Kd-122 and trucking

 

开云体育

??? The person to talk to about moving a 20' wide boat would be a house mover.? While there is not even the remotest weight comparison, their know how with regard to loading, supporting, and transporting wide odd shaped loads, as well as knowledge of regulation and problems, best routes, etc would be invaluable.? They more or less construct a trailer from the beams and dollies they have, for each specific job........ at least the real pros do.?? Your boat of course could be hauled on an ordinary? drop deck or lowboy trailer just fine....... even a long goosneck equipment trailer, but the issues are permits and such.? Roads may need to be closed briefly, turn outs found to allow traffic to pass, trees and brush trimmed back in places.? Choosing the right route, the right time of day, and finding detours for traffic, and gaining the cooperation of the authorities are all important, but it's worth going through all of this BEFORE the boat is built....... which obviously you are doing.
??? The more ideal solution is to build sub assemblies as much as possible so that final assembly can be done in a boatyard.? That bypasses all the transport problems.

??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? H.W.



On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, voya12m@... [k-designs] wrote:

?
Hi Franco
I am planning on transporting the Voyager, upon completion of course, to the water by means of a trailer. The empty weight of the voyager (no mast either) should be around 3100 kg or about 7000 lbs. Even if it weighs a bit more, a double axle flat bed trailer meant for transporting farm machinery should work. Maybe even a hay bale trailer that has a pivoting forward axle. We are in a farming area here. The hulls should be plenty strong - enough to go unsupported. I plan to use pallets or some other simple structure on the flat trailer with either tires (tyres) or foam on top to support the bridge deck between the hulls. Of course the Voyager is wide enough to take up the entire road, so a special permit is needed for the wide load and usually a flag truck is required to precede the whole operation on the road. A farm tractor will certainly be strong enough to pull it, perhaps even a simple truck or utility vehicle. Another consideration is the boat ramp. Most boat ramps around here are 10 or even 18 feet wide. Not wide enough. Our plan A is to use a very gently sloping sandy and shallow pond which has canal access to launch the boat. This requires permission from the farmer but no permit. Plan B is to get the permit to transport the “wide load” down to the only boat ramp wide enough. Plan C is to get the permit to transport the boat to the nearest boatyard which has an old crane to lift the Voyager to the water. The attached pic is an Oram 44c.?


I think if you currently have a good place to build, use it. There is usually a way to get the boat to the water somehow. I think Bernd had to remove part of the roof of the shed to get his Pelican out, and used a crane. I have seen other pictures of a crane lifting the boat out of the backyard and on to a big truck. The more important issue is having plenty of time to build. And not having to pay rent for a shed. Or at least, not having to pay very much rent. This allows you to enjoy the building process without the passing of time costing you financially. I have more pictures of the build than what is on this forum if you are interested at any point.?
Cheers
Patrick



Re: Intro

 

no Andrew is right, 500mm from the "mastbeam" till the entrance, the 600mm till the aft beam.

Bernd


Re: Leeboard / Luffboard

 

H.W.

Thanks for the compliments. Buckminster Fuller was in many respects ahead of his time and this for many differnt subjects. Example: the use of the geothetic constructions he invented abd used for the Lancaster. What I am telling you, you will know.
I use the luffboards now also for the updaded ECO series of sailing crafts. Nobody build a KD 860 with these bords till now. Sailors in general are very conservative for new ideas. See my bow shape of the original ECO 55. The merits for this hull shape is clear, but not as a ?gimmick as on so many boats now. It was taking an other 9 years as the idea was picked up by the Swiss ALINGI crew/designers. Vertical rudder automatic, I designed for my first cat, the SC 435. Was also shown in one of the "Practical Boatowner" magazine 1981. Other climed then it was there invention years later. Now you can them see in different forms on many boats.?
Never mind, Have fun

Bernd ?


Re: Kd-122 and trucking

 


There is a special transport for necessary. Companies exists which can do this.
If you have the possibility to build on the water edge, the better I would do so


Re: KD1000 Headroom

 

As stated in on the webpage in the deck house 1,9m. By the way in the hulls 2,0m


Re: Intro

 

开云体育

On 11/28/2017 12:33 AM, andrewklees@... [k-designs] wrote:

500? loaded, 600 empty..............? That's what it looks like to me.

??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? H.W.


?

Yep 500 & 600mm is correct for bridge deck clearance for kd860. And hull width to lenght ratio @ waterline is 11:1 not 8:1 as far as i know.



Re: Kd-122 and trucking

 

Hi Franco
I am planning on transporting the Voyager, upon completion of course, to the water by means of a trailer. The empty weight of the voyager (no mast either) should be around 3100 kg or about 7000 lbs. Even if it weighs a bit more, a double axle flat bed trailer meant for transporting farm machinery should work. Maybe even a hay bale trailer that has a pivoting forward axle. We are in a farming area here. The hulls should be plenty strong - enough to go unsupported. I plan to use pallets or some other simple structure on the flat trailer with either tires (tyres) or foam on top to support the bridge deck between the hulls. Of course the Voyager is wide enough to take up the entire road, so a special permit is needed for the wide load and usually a flag truck is required to precede the whole operation on the road. A farm tractor will certainly be strong enough to pull it, perhaps even a simple truck or utility vehicle. Another consideration is the boat ramp. Most boat ramps around here are 10 or even 18 feet wide. Not wide enough. Our plan A is to use a very gently sloping sandy and shallow pond which has canal access to launch the boat. This requires permission from the farmer but no permit. Plan B is to get the permit to transport the “wide load” down to the only boat ramp wide enough. Plan C is to get the permit to transport the boat to the nearest boatyard which has an old crane to lift the Voyager to the water. The attached pic is an Oram 44c.?


I think if you currently have a good place to build, use it. There is usually a way to get the boat to the water somehow. I think Bernd had to remove part of the roof of the shed to get his Pelican out, and used a crane. I have seen other pictures of a crane lifting the boat out of the backyard and on to a big truck. The more important issue is having plenty of time to build. And not having to pay rent for a shed. Or at least, not having to pay very much rent. This allows you to enjoy the building process without the passing of time costing you financially. I have more pictures of the build than what is on this forum if you are interested at any point.?
Cheers
Patrick


KD1000 Headroom

 

Can someone tell me what the height is in the new KD1000 in the hulls and bridgedeck?? Thanks.


Re: Intro

 

Yep 500 & 600mm is correct for bridge deck clearance for kd860. And hull width to lenght ratio @ waterline is 11:1 not 8:1 as far as i know.


Kd-122 and trucking

Franco Perale
 

I am studying kd122 and an important parameter is whether it is transportable by (special) truck or whether it must be built near a waterway.?
Anyone any idea??
Thanks?
Franco?


Leeboard / Luffboard

 

Bernd:

??? ?? I ran across the "luffboard" pdfs the other day, an interesting
addition to the KD860, a much better option than a dagger board or
centerboard, and ironically it reflects the thought that always crosses
my mind when I see photos of cats with daggerboards, which I consider
too vulnerable.? Richard Woods for example offers the option of
daggerboards or mini keels, one too vulnerable to damage, and the other
reduces the draft too much.

??? On a hull with the shape of the KD860, it's a natural solution,
because the support is relatively simple.??? Leeboards are an excellent
solution for sailing craft, but tend to be ugly and look like an
afterthought, due to the need to angle them outward to get the desired
effectiveness.?? On a multihull, with it's narrow hull as compared to
monohulls, and broad beam........ and shallow heel angle, it makes
excellent sense to simply follow the hull on the inboard side like this.

??? Your outside the box thought process very much reminds me of the
engineer I greatly admired when I was in my teens.... Buckminster
Fuller.?? His solutions were based on reason and logic, with a touch of
brilliance, rather than on convention. Other teens were obsessed with
rock stars, movie stars, and sports heroes........... I would have given
my eye teeth to have had the chance to sit at Buckminster Fuller's feet,
and hopefully to absorb some of that brilliance.

??? I'm wondering if any KD860's have been built with these luffboards,
and how they have worked out.??? They are not deep, but an asymmetric
foil operating in water can produce a lot of force.


??????????????????????????????????????????? H.W.


Re: Trailering an ECO 5.5 (or similar small cat)

 

Robert

A flatbed trailer is a very good solution. Normally the have a ramp for car transport. Make a device (wood will do) with wheels on each side. Tilt the boat on the bow up Place the wheel construction till the boat is almost in equilibriumand. ?Have a winch at the front to get the boat on the trailer. Fasten the boat and you are ready to go. At the ramp go backwards so that the ramp is on the wateredge. Unfasten the boat and it will go almost by itsel in the water. Remove the wheels and you are almost ready to go. There exists trailers for two bikes side by side the will also work. It is a matter to find the correct geometry that this system works. But I am sure this would be the easiest and most cost effective solution.

Bernd


Re: Intro [2 Attachments]

 

H.W.

On the Pelican we had a sort of gooseneck fitting to control the twist. On the KD 860 and the ECO 75 the mast rotates to control the twist. Yes there are also control lines to control the wishbone. This is in both version enough to control the twist in the sail. Because we use no Aluminum profile over the stay, the sail can be lowered like any normal main sail. In all the years we have had never a furler failure. I see no reason why the furler should jam. This problem from jamming mainsails is a problem when you have to roll the sail inside the mast. Then the mostly full cut main sail jams in the middle (because to much material form in this region) and yes, you have a problem. Multihulls have anyway less problems, because the corde to depth of a monohull main is normally 6 to 8 %, wheres 4 % is the maximum for fast multihulls. For a cover you can have a sleeve with a long zipper which you can set when the sail is furled.

Lucky you with a fast Internet. If there is some wind, and it is a region with much wind power failure is also a very common occurence here.?

Bernd


Re: Intro [2 Attachments]

 

开云体育

Bernd:
???
??? What I was not understanding is that the wishbone and gaff are permanently attached at the masthead.?? Your photo clearly shows this to be the case, and also shows the sail furled to the mast, rather than the usual? method of furling to the boom on a mainsail.?? The wishbone & gaff here are clearly stayed so that they cannot swing as the boom swings, which would seem to enforce a twist.? The head of the sail is obviously drawn out to the wishbone by a control line through a block, and I would assume this line to be pretty important in controlling sail twist.?? The wishbone / gaff combination is similar to a jib crane arrangement, and clearly the wishbone allows for the head of the sail to be slacked a bit to come at least partially in line with the boom.?? I'd love to see this rig sailing in real life.?? I can only imagine the mess if the furler jammed and failed to work, but that's never pretty, and invariably happens at the most inopportune moment.?? Another question that comes to mind is how is a sail cover installed?

??? I also live in a very remote small town with a current population of 7 people, and the same number of dogs.?? Fortunately for us, a main fiber optic cable passes through here, and we have a telephone exchange sitting right on it, and so have superb internet.??? The biggest problem here is extremely unreliable electricity with outages ranging from 12 hours to 24 hours much more common than they should be.?

??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? H.W.


On 11/27/2017 07:40 AM, Bernd Kohler Bernd@... [k-designs] wrote:

?
Hi

Funny, I posted the wrong picture from the Ljunstr?m rig, the intentoin was to post this one. I did it of course for obviouse reasons, to show the difference in design approach. I think Pete used this extreme low aspect ratio because of his experience with "China Moon" whit which he was very far down to the South (below 50°) and the weather conditions there.
Okay to the wishbone rig. As attachment a picture of a wishbone rig on an ECO 75. Here you can see more details. The owner was afraid of the boat. To fast for his liking ?and he gave it away for $ 7800,-!
I have no sailing pictures or a video of the Pelican under sail, not even one! An other time, I had a mobile phone with a weight of 8 kgs. We are now back at 1997 or so. Als I sold the Pelican there where no videos. By the way, in this time you meed some other sailors some where sai in the Aegeis sailing to Istanbul and we back perhaps to Denia (Spain). Sometimes, for a good sip and chat where to go next and never meed them again. I have a lot of pictures from others boats and the will have them from the Pelican. The never got there photos, or I mine. It was the end of the time "bumming" around on boats for almost nothing. We where not interested in videos or photos, we where living our dream of freedome. A long storry for nothing; I know, so, besides this photo, I can show you nothing. I have a complete plan a wishbone rig which I sell as an extra. For good measure I add also an illustration ofte KD 860 wittis rig.?

Cheers
Bernd?

NB.: I life relative far away from the sillivication (no mistake) in a hamlet with now 19 inhabitants. So when I do not answer quick, my slow or many times not working Internetconnection is the reason.



Von: "StoneTool owly@... [k-designs]"
An: k-designs@...
Gesendet: 18:54 Sonntag, 26.November 2017
Betreff: Re: [k-designs] Re: Intro

?
Bernd:

??? I know the first rig well.... It's Arne's boat Johanna with his cambered junk rig, The second (Dobra Kusa) I believe is a Ljungstr?m rig, though the photo doesn't really show it to best effect with it's double loose footed sails furled about a rotating mast..... A very interesting rig. ? Your photo of Pete's final, or at least third iteration on Oryx, shows great detail of how he built his version of Paul McKay's Aerojunk rig.? I've felt since I first saw photos of Oryx that the aspect ratio was a bit too low, nor could I understand why one would truncate the upper panel, except perhaps to serve as storm canvas, though there are other ways this could be done.?? The beauty of this system is that a nicely cambered sail can be achieved using absolutely flat sailcloth, and the batten system is simple and very strong.? A rugged, and very "field serviceable" rig.? When people comment about windage or drag, one has only to point the veritable birds nest of standing rigging on most Bermuda rigs, and the liabilities it often poses when setting sails and tacking, and that without mentioning the veritable house of cards with dozens of possible points of failure, any of which can bring the whole thing toppling down.?


alt
Ljungstr?m rig

??? I'd love to see a video of your wishbone gaff rig in operation...... I have difficulty really understanding the details of it from the few photos I can find.?? I've read most of your work that is to be found on the Duckworks website, all of which is quite worthwhile reading, and contains some valuable insights.?? I have a passion for innovative, original, and outside the box thinking.?? It's what drives progress forward.?? Sometimes things that didn't work out well are of as much value as things that did, as far as what can be learned from them.?? Your own work only came to my attention through Oryx, and shows the kind of innovative outside the box thinking, good choices, and great flexibility of thought that I've always admired.???


??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? H.W.


On 11/26/2017 06:49 AM, Bernd@... [k-designs] wrote:
?
?You are rigth, it was not necessary to go into the junk rig details. I am also a memberfrom the Junk Rig Assication. Because there are intersting developments. I like special some of the Norwegian boats with there beautiful champerd sails. I hope also that the discussion was, besides for you, helpful. Thanks for all the contriputions from the others. At last here two pictures from complete different rigs to make my point in this respect.?

Cheers

Bernd





Re: Intro

 

Hi

Funny, I posted the wrong picture from the Ljunstr?m rig, the intentoin was to post this one. I did it of course for obviouse reasons, to show the difference in design approach. I think Pete used this extreme low aspect ratio because of his experience with "China Moon" whit which he was very far down to the South (below 50°) and the weather conditions there.
Okay to the wishbone rig. As attachment a picture of a wishbone rig on an ECO 75. Here you can see more details. The owner was afraid of the boat. To fast for his liking ?and he gave it away for $ 7800,-!
I have no sailing pictures or a video of the Pelican under sail, not even one! An other time, I had a mobile phone with a weight of 8 kgs. We are now back at 1997 or so. Als I sold the Pelican there where no videos. By the way, in this time you meed some other sailors some where sai in the Aegeis sailing to Istanbul and we back perhaps to Denia (Spain). Sometimes, for a good sip and chat where to go next and never meed them again. I have a lot of pictures from others boats and the will have them from the Pelican. The never got there photos, or I mine. It was the end of the time "bumming" around on boats for almost nothing. We where not interested in videos or photos, we where living our dream of freedome. A long storry for nothing; I know, so, besides this photo, I can show you nothing. I have a complete plan a wishbone rig which I sell as an extra. For good measure I add also an illustration ofte KD 860 wittis rig.?

Cheers
Bernd?

NB.: I life relative far away from the sillivication (no mistake) in a hamlet with now 19 inhabitants. So when I do not answer quick, my slow or many times not working Internetconnection is the reason.



Von: "StoneTool owly@... [k-designs]" <k-designs@...>
An: k-designs@...
Gesendet: 18:54 Sonntag, 26.November 2017
Betreff: Re: [k-designs] Re: Intro

?
Bernd:

??? I know the first rig well.... It's Arne's boat Johanna with his cambered junk rig, The second (Dobra Kusa) I believe is a Ljungstr?m rig, though the photo doesn't really show it to best effect with it's double loose footed sails furled about a rotating mast..... A very interesting rig. ? Your photo of Pete's final, or at least third iteration on Oryx, shows great detail of how he built his version of Paul McKay's Aerojunk rig.? I've felt since I first saw photos of Oryx that the aspect ratio was a bit too low, nor could I understand why one would truncate the upper panel, except perhaps to serve as storm canvas, though there are other ways this could be done.?? The beauty of this system is that a nicely cambered sail can be achieved using absolutely flat sailcloth, and the batten system is simple and very strong.? A rugged, and very "field serviceable" rig.? When people comment about windage or drag, one has only to point the veritable birds nest of standing rigging on most Bermuda rigs, and the liabilities it often poses when setting sails and tacking, and that without mentioning the veritable house of cards with dozens of possible points of failure, any of which can bring the whole thing toppling down.?


alt
Ljungstr?m rig

??? I'd love to see a video of your wishbone gaff rig in operation...... I have difficulty really understanding the details of it from the few photos I can find.?? I've read most of your work that is to be found on the Duckworks website, all of which is quite worthwhile reading, and contains some valuable insights.?? I have a passion for innovative, original, and outside the box thinking.?? It's what drives progress forward.?? Sometimes things that didn't work out well are of as much value as things that did, as far as what can be learned from them.?? Your own work only came to my attention through Oryx, and shows the kind of innovative outside the box thinking, good choices, and great flexibility of thought that I've always admired.???


??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? H.W.


On 11/26/2017 06:49 AM, Bernd@... [k-designs] wrote:

?
?You are rigth, it was not necessary to go into the junk rig details. I am also a memberfrom the Junk Rig Assication. Because there are intersting developments. I like special some of the Norwegian boats with there beautiful champerd sails. I hope also that the discussion was, besides for you, helpful. Thanks for all the contriputions from the others. At last here two pictures from complete different rigs to make my point in this respect.?

Cheers

Bernd




Re: Trailering an ECO 5.5 (or similar small cat)

 

To trailers

I did not want to make a new topic. I would first thank Hamish for the photos. Looks perfect, as expected from you. You a very hard working and patient person. The boat looks phantastic. And now, sailing at the weekend?
Keep us informed. I am very curiouse, and you know why. By the way, can be that you need some more strands od bungee cord on the lower part of the rudder housing.

Cheers

Bernd


Re: Voyager plans for sale

 

My apologies, I thought the name Voyager was sufficient; it’s the KD122.?

Anybody interested should contact me directly at lvogtman@... so as not to clutter the forum with personal email.

Lee