开云体育

Brian

We made in this time for a part our sails too. These were developed with a very good sailmaker in the Netherlands.
This was before big companies like BIC were stepping into the windsurfing business.
Remember, this was before the digital time. So no videos.?

Cheers
Bernd

Bernd, great photo. A pity there were no videos from your sailing of the 425 prototype. Those are great looking sails and very modern looking for 1986. Having good sails for a boat is more important than a lot of people realise.?

cheers , Bryan

Ursi and I are on our DUO 425 on the beach from Vieste 1986.
Fantastic sailing with the DU 425 prototype. The boat was a sensation.
Nobody had seen a parallel rig catamaran at this time.
We were there for four weeks in Vieste.?
Please send me the videos to my email.

Cheers

Bernd

Hi Domenico

Thank you for the information.?
The problem with bigger boats
Too much interior to build and it can get lost in details.
OK, your situation is different. The boat is built?for a client.
I am curious about the videos from the Puglia region
I just got an old picture from the area I made many years ago in my fingers during?the same period, we sailed the DUO 425 there.
We needed 3 hours to set up the?boat on the beach with all the friendly help from the people from Vieste.?
Normally the boat is set up in 15 minutes.

Cheers? Bernd

Chiao Domenico

I was already wondering if we could see nothing from you.
It was logical that there would be changes on the inside. The good thing is that between the bulkheads, anything can be changed without weakening
the structure of the boat.
Did you do some sailing with Zeus or the? DUO 900?

Ciao?

Thank very much, Bernd. I understand now - all is clear.

Sorry, again I give the same building time because, look at the extra cabin sides on the cockpit side. The more complicated entrances.
In the end, to be honest, you will need a bit more time.?

Bernd

Dear Bernd,

Sorry, I have a different but related question, having also bought the Omega study plans recently.

I appreciate that when you do provide an estimated build time for designs it is with the clear caveat that every builder will need a different time to complete according to their skillset, work speed and desired level of finish. However...

For both the original 860 and for the Omega you indicate the build time being the same. I had anticipated that the Omega would be a little quicker due to the open cockpit concept. Please can you clarify whether or not you expect builders will see a meaningful saving in time if choosing to build the Omega version?

Thanks and regards, Adrian

Hi Pedro

I am wondering what you have got. Because I checket just the studyplan and he is correct.
Never mind

I will send you the good one when my Internet is working proberly again

Bernd

Hi Alain

You are right. The correct one is these.

Point is Yahoo sold the web hosting to another company who changed the server system.
I can not work with it and have to switch over to another hosting service.
In the meantime, here is the specification for the KD 860???

Bernd

Hi Bernd, Hi all,

the biplane rig is very interesting, just a question: how do you reduce the surface of the mainsail?

Hi Bernd,

The two specifications in the pictures that you sent yesterday are the same.

The dimension I have on my KD860 Open dxf drawing are L.O.A: 8.6m and Beam CL to CL: 4.3m. Draft CWL is 401mm. The weight was stated at 1200kg with a permissible payload of 2000kg. The recommended engine power was 10HP.

You may want to change the information on your webpage.

Best Regards,

Alain

Here are going things a bit wrong.
Here two screenshots
First is from the houseboat spec second KD 860. And again. The beam on the KD 860 is from Cl to Cl.

Bernd

These are correct

Bernd

Evidently data on the web page is from ECO8 Houseboat, not KD860 Open. I got this for KD860 Open:

Hi to all and

?