¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Intro


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Andrew:

??? This is exactly the problem I'm wrestling with.?? Multihulls have limited load carrying capacity, and as Bernd mentioned I've been looking at some of Jim Brown's Searunners, and to get the same payload means going with the 37 footer........ that's a BIG boat.?? The problem of course is what constitutes "payload" and "dry weight" is something I believe varies significantly from designer to designer, and as Bernd pointed out, it's easy to over build, and people have a tendency to doll boats up with pretty stuff that is not particularly valuable, but adds to weight.?? I am beginning to realize that virtually all small multihulls are overloaded when making passages.?
??? The only way I can see to judge real world weight and payload for an individual boat meaningfully, would be to have the boat sitting in the water as equipped..... rig, anchors and rode, and other known items, then load it using plastic drums of water or sand bags, etc until it was sitting at LWL.?? This would give a real world working payload...... each drum of water would work out to about 215 kg, and they could be properly distributed and filled using a pump and siphoned out.??? I consider something like this a reasonable first step before even doing a survey.? Can it realistically do what I want to do is the first question.??
??? I'm mostly a single hander....... it's my nature, I enjoy solitude, however it's only logical on a long passage, say the Canaries to Barbados, or Panama to the Pacific Islands to take on a crew member.? That alone adds up to about 250 lbs of human flesh and gear, plus 4.2 pounds of water per day, and probably 3 pounds of food....... Let's say 500 total additional pounds for a crossing including a safety margin.??? As Bernd points out a watermaker makes sense when looking at 250 pounds of water plus containers..... a human powered water maker would be great.... You want a fresh water shower... start pedaling!?? A water maker also makes it possible to reduce the weight of food stores.?? Things like beans, rice, noodles, dried foods, etc, all require water to prepare, and are all light weight high energy foods.?? You can only reduce spares by having fewer systems / simpler systems.? The junk rig with it's free standing mast(s) eliminates all standing rigging.? It doesn't require winches, or a mast with a track and slides, it doesn't require a traveler or a vang, and it only has a single sail per mast.? Tacking is almost a simple as making a lane change in your car.? You can reef with a cup of coffee in one hand without spilling it.? Blondie Hassler crossed the Atlantic in Jester wearing bedroom slippers...... or so he claimed.??? In my book, simple is best, even if it means sacrificing a bit of convenience, and speed.??? Simpler ultimately ends up being lighter in most cases.?? How much stuff can I NOT have??? Pumped water and flush toilets are at the top of the list to eliminate.?? A plastic jug with a spigot on a shelf is "running water".?? A black plastic bag hanging in the sun.... solar shower / water heater.??? Propane bottles weigh nearly as much as the fuel in them, and are an absurd cooking fuel for a light weight boat.?? I've seen photos of big heavy wooden tables in the saloon on these boats........? absurd dead weight that takes displaces payload.?? Looking at the interior photos of cats, one sees all kinds places where weight could be removed or reduced.??

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? H.W.


On 11/23/2017 05:16 PM, andrewklees@... [k-designs] wrote:

?

Hi. the boat was designed to be offshore capable and Is I'm my opinion. However a catamaran of this size is on the cusp of what you can get away with for extended cruising and live aboard use. I Think Richard woods intimates this for his cruising designs in the 8 -9m size as well.

The problem with catamarans is, you have all the space in the world to put stuff, but not the ability to cary it (safely). As opposed to a monohull, where it will take the weight but no space to put it. Having 2 hulls (that are slender enough to perform as a sailing boat) does not add up to great payload capacity
Plenty of people put all there cruising gear in small catamarans, but look were the water line ends up. On pictures of Oryx the water line is well above the transoms. The designed fully loaded waterline is supposed to be with the transoms just clear of the water for the KD860. You can pile as much stuff as you like into a small catamaran and it won't sink, but will it still be sea worthy?
When you add up the weight of all the gear that you would take for long term cruising, it becomes significant.
for example.-
Main anchor and rode, spare anchor and rode, fenders and fender boards, shore lines, engine spares, boat repair spares, safety gear, sufficient battery capacity and charging ability to run an autopilot 24h/day, dingy and oars, fuel , water, food, people, peoples clothes and personal items, nav charts and books guides etc, rigging spares, spare autopilot or parts, droge and or sea anchor + warps, stuff to cook on and eat off, first aid gear. And it just goes on and on.
So the simple thing to do, is do a calculation on your expected payload that you require, and get a boat designed to carry it, the Kd860 may or may not be the boat for your application.
In my situation, I wanted the smallest boat that I could , single hand, do extended coastal cruising, do occasional?offshore passages, afford to build and maintain. And in that respect the KD860 is perfect. For living aboard as a couple and long term cruising on a budget, I think the voyager design would be the choice.?
Cheers¡­... Andrew.




Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.