¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe center cutter assembly is no different than the outer two.? It¡¯s only the pulley that¡¯s different.? Unless the housing or the shaft are damaged, the bearings are easily available to refurbish the cutter.? I could probably find a center double pulley for the 42¡± in my stash if that¡¯s all you need.? The earlier 42¡± decks used the same shafts (1¡±) as the 50¡± decks with grease zerks, however the later 42¡± decks used a smaller (3/4¡±) shaft with sealed bearings, probably to reduce costs and noise.? The complete cutter assemblies are interchangeable as the shell mount is the same. ? Never had the need to consider other cutter assemblies.? These, particularly the 1¡± ones are quite good.? A quick check of bearing condition when removing the blades for sharpening is all I¡¯ve ever needed; I replace the bearings when I detect some wear, but they typically have lasted years, mowing 2 acres. ? kemajic in MT 1983 GT16H 1982 GT12H (Upgraded with K341) 1980 GT14H (Hibernating) ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
On Behalf Of kevin leitch
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 3:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [JacobsenFordGardenTractors] Alternate Part Numbers for Mandrels (spindels) 1983 42 in Deck ? Hi all, has anyone converted the 42" deck using "other brand" mandrels/spindle kits? |