¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Alternate Part Numbers for Mandrels (spindels) 1983 42 in Deck


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The center cutter assembly is no different than the outer two.? It¡¯s only the pulley that¡¯s different.? Unless the housing or the shaft are damaged, the bearings are easily available to refurbish the cutter.? I could probably find a center double pulley for the 42¡± in my stash if that¡¯s all you need.? The earlier 42¡± decks used the same shafts (1¡±) as the 50¡± decks with grease zerks, however the later 42¡± decks used a smaller (3/4¡±) shaft with sealed bearings, probably to reduce costs and noise.? The complete cutter assemblies are interchangeable as the shell mount is the same.

?

Never had the need to consider other cutter assemblies.? These, particularly the 1¡± ones are quite good.? A quick check of bearing condition when removing the blades for sharpening is all I¡¯ve ever needed; I replace the bearings when I detect some wear, but they typically have lasted years, mowing 2 acres.

?

kemajic in MT

1983 GT16H

1982 GT12H (Upgraded with K341)

1980 GT14H (Hibernating)

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of kevin leitch
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 3:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [JacobsenFordGardenTractors] Alternate Part Numbers for Mandrels (spindels) 1983 42 in Deck

?

Hi all, has anyone converted the 42" deck using "other brand" mandrels/spindle kits?

I'm just about done with my rebuild (blast, cut, weld, repaint) and find there are several parts no longer available.??
So, Ford/JAC loyalties aside, why not go with a Husq or other brand and just adjust the belt size to fit the?
new spindle system?? ?My primary issue is the center mandrel and double pulley being obsolete.
Any thoughts are appreciated.
--
Kevin
Ford LGT 125
Raleigh, NC

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.