¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

FM Tuner alignment generator?..


 

>I am not aware of HP units that can be as good at this specific work as some of?
>the Panasonic models I know. The Panasonic, Meguro, and some of the other?
>makes mentioned cater very specifically and with the right set of features to?
>the FM tuner techs. I don't think you should be focusing on HP for this duty.?
>I am a hardcore fan of HP instrumentation and I use a Panasonic for this work.?
>There may be HP units I am not aware of, but once I got this, I never looked back.?

I have looked at the distortion specifications of the HP FM generators in this tread.

They state distortion between 3 % to 1 % so far.

The Sound Technology 1020 that I use has a stated distortion of 0.01 % at 100% modulation, +-75 kHz.

My Yamaha CT7000 FM tuner has a measured distortion of 0.011 % at 100 % modulation in wide mode
using the ST1020 generator.

This tells me that the FM tuner can be better than 0.011 % distortion since we are very close to?
the generator stated 0.01 % distortion.

Now there are many FM tuners available with a stated thd at 100 % modulation below 0.02 % distortion.

How can you properly adjust an FM tuner with that low distrtion if the FM generator, HP, generates 1 % distortion ?


--------

Best regards,

Goran Finnberg
The Mastering Room AB
Goteborg
Sweden

E-mail: mastering@...

Learn from the mistakes of others, you can never live long enough to
make them all yourself.??? -?? John Luther

(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") Ranglet, Aron, VovVov, Nero & Smurfen:RIP


 

With an HP generator with that stated distortion value, I can't imagine you can - though in my experience HP instrumentation often far exceeds its stated spec. But I never used an HP generator for alignment, so I can't really speak of that.?

With a Panasonic (and other similar, newer units), you absolutely can. Even if the stated distortion may be higher, in practice their actual performance allows for much finer adjustment. Which is why I feel these instruments are of the same breed as those made by an HP (orTek, AP, and a few others in the same class), which is to say they may exceed their spec'd performance by a good bit.?

I am speaking here of actual measured performance. If an instrument allows me to adjust the?DUT to a certain level, I don't care what its spec is (I'll simply conclude it exceeds it, which is simply to believe my empirical data).?

On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:58 AM Goran Finnberg via <mastering=[email protected]> wrote:
>I am not aware of HP units that can be as good at this specific work as some of?
>the Panasonic models I know. The Panasonic, Meguro, and some of the other?
>makes mentioned cater very specifically and with the right set of features to?
>the FM tuner techs. I don't think you should be focusing on HP for this duty.?
>I am a hardcore fan of HP instrumentation and I use a Panasonic for this work.?
>There may be HP units I am not aware of, but once I got this, I never looked back.?

I have looked at the distortion specifications of the HP FM generators in this tread.

They state distortion between 3 % to 1 % so far.

The Sound Technology 1020 that I use has a stated distortion of 0.01 % at 100% modulation, +-75 kHz.

My Yamaha CT7000 FM tuner has a measured distortion of 0.011 % at 100 % modulation in wide mode
using the ST1020 generator.

This tells me that the FM tuner can be better than 0.011 % distortion since we are very close to?
the generator stated 0.01 % distortion.

Now there are many FM tuners available with a stated thd at 100 % modulation below 0.02 % distortion.

How can you properly adjust an FM tuner with that low distrtion if the FM generator, HP, generates 1 % distortion ?


--------

Best regards,

Goran Finnberg
The Mastering Room AB
Goteborg
Sweden

E-mail: mastering@...

Learn from the mistakes of others, you can never live long enough to
make them all yourself.??? -?? John Luther

(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") Ranglet, Aron, VovVov, Nero & Smurfen:RIP


 

Spec for the old 8656A is 0.5% THD, but is normally much better for the internal oscillator.? You can use a low distortion external oscillator of course, and even an MPX generator.? I don't know what you are looking at.? The 8657x may be better or the same, I don't know.
Spec for the Sencore SG80 is 0.01% and is typically better, also provision for an external signal source.
I have an SMG1 which measures very low measured modulated THD, but the manual states 0.1% THD.

The fact is that many instruments perform much better than the stated specifications.? So comparing measured distortion to manual specs is not a level playing field at all.? I do remember running all mine through an HP 8901A and also a Boonton? AD82 modulation meter.? I check my equipment with these on occasion and always use them to set actual modulation levels using an external source.

I was authorized warranty for Revox, McIntosh, Yamaha and others who all make excellent tuners.? I do have to say that when you get close to equipment residuals you cannot assume anything.? You can get cancellation and noise becomes an issue too.? When things get that low I am looking at output spectrum as well as a meter needle (HP 339A and ShibaSoku AD725C).? Besides, transmitted FM signals have higher distortion than 0.011%, typically a lot more.

The average tuner distortion does sit in the 0.15% to 0.25% range.? While you couldn't measure the level of distortion using a generator with 0.5% THD, you can still align it for minimum distortion.? The OP was questioning a single, non-remarkable instrument.? This is only suitable for setting up mid-range tuners while having good training and experience.??

-Chris