¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

HP 8970B with 346B Noise source - Error 13


 

Hello,

Since the thread about cheap noise source on the other list got very
interesting and I was doing some repairs on my HP 8970A and 8970B I
would like to ask some questions which I am not sure how to approach.

I bought a 346B some years back and used it with my 8970A and all was
OK, recently I got an 8970B with E70 error. I found the 1st EPROM broken
and replaced it with the firmware found on KO4BB site. Since I was
inside the unit also replaced the battery.

And here the problem started...

After battery replacement I had E80 so I proceeded with the calibration
33 SP and the 346B source. Problem is that it fails in around 1-2
seconds with E13. E13 is saying that it is practically not enough ENR
coming from the source?! Correct me if I'm wrong.

So I powered on the 8970A and tested the source there. All OK and 33.1
SP works fine and shows around +4.x dBm uncorrected value after it finishes.

From my readings on the HP lists I saw some people reported that the
value should be +6 to +8 dB uncorrected. WHy I only see +4 dB?

So I am not sure now if my 346B is broken or the 8970B is broken since
everything works on 8970A. Another possibility would be that the 5dB
attenuator pad in the 8970B is broken.

Can someone tell me what is the uncorrected value for the 346B and 8970A
after calibration? Is there any difference in reported uncalibrated
value between 8970A and 8970B?

Best regards,
Razvan


 

E 13 =>? ENR must be 11dB minimum at 30MHz - the HP346b has 5dB ! ! !

Am 14.06.2024 um 10:49 schrieb Razvan Popescu via groups.io:

Hello,

Since the thread about cheap noise source on the other list got very
interesting and I was doing some repairs on my HP 8970A and 8970B I
would like to ask some questions which I am not sure how to approach.

I bought a 346B some years back and used it with my 8970A and all was
OK, recently I got an 8970B with E70 error. I found the 1st EPROM broken
and replaced it with the firmware found on KO4BB site. Since I was
inside the unit also replaced the battery.

And here the problem started...

After battery replacement I had E80 so I proceeded with the calibration
33 SP and the 346B source. Problem is that it fails in around 1-2
seconds with E13. E13 is saying that it is practically not enough ENR
coming from the source?! Correct me if I'm wrong.

So I powered on the 8970A and tested the source there. All OK and 33.1
SP works fine and shows around +4.x dBm uncorrected value after it finishes.

From my readings on the HP lists I saw some people reported that the
value should be +6 to +8 dB uncorrected. WHy I only see +4 dB?

So I am not sure now if my 346B is broken or the 8970B is broken since
everything works on 8970A. Another possibility would be that the 5dB
attenuator pad in the 8970B is broken.

Can someone tell me what is the uncorrected value for the 346B and 8970A
after calibration? Is there any difference in reported uncalibrated
value between 8970A and 8970B?

Best regards,
Razvan




 

Am 14.06.2024 um 10:59 schrieb DF6NA Rainer:

E 13 =>? ENR must be 11dB minimum at 30MHz - the HP346b has 5dB ! ! !
SRI it's the 346A?? ! ! !

Am 14.06.2024 um 10:49 schrieb Razvan Popescu via groups.io:
Hello,

Since the thread about cheap noise source on the other list got very
interesting and I was doing some repairs on my HP 8970A and 8970B I
would like to ask some questions which I am not sure how to approach.

I bought a 346B some years back and used it with my 8970A and all was
OK, recently I got an 8970B with E70 error. I found the 1st EPROM broken
and replaced it with the firmware found on KO4BB site. Since I was
inside the unit also replaced the battery.

And here the problem started...

After battery replacement I had E80 so I proceeded with the calibration
33 SP and the 346B source. Problem is that it fails in around 1-2
seconds with E13. E13 is saying that it is practically not enough ENR
coming from the source?! Correct me if I'm wrong.

So I powered on the 8970A and tested the source there. All OK and 33.1
SP works fine and shows around +4.x dBm uncorrected value after it finishes.

From my readings on the HP lists I saw some people reported that the
value should be +6 to +8 dB uncorrected. WHy I only see +4 dB?

So I am not sure now if my 346B is broken or the 8970B is broken since
everything works on 8970A. Another possibility would be that the 5dB
attenuator pad in the 8970B is broken.

Can someone tell me what is the uncorrected value for the 346B and 8970A
after calibration? Is there any difference in reported uncalibrated
value between 8970A and 8970B?

Best regards,
Razvan








 

It works on the 8970A and reports +4dB after calibration.
It doesn't work on 8970B.

Do you have a 8970A and 346B to check the uncorrected value reported?

On 14/06/2024 13:01, DF6NA Rainer via groups.io wrote:
Am 14.06.2024 um 10:59 schrieb DF6NA Rainer:

E 13 =>? ENR must be 11dB minimum at 30MHz - the HP346b has 5dB ! ! !
SRI it's the 346A?? ! ! !


 

Apart from suspecting the 5dB pad in the 8970B...

I will hint at a solution to this problem may be the supply voltages out of tolerance.

Check all DC voltage levels on the various boards and modules. NOT by measuring at the PSU test pins.
I once had a similar problem in an 8970A. That instrument repeatedly failed self calibration with various
error messages. All voltages checked out OK on the PSU but on the (large) CPU board, the TTL 5V
was somewhere like 4.3 to 4.4V and fluctuating. There are several axial inductors that decouple the
DC voltages, one of which had a too large DC resistance. Once replaced, the instrument returned
to fully functional.

Cheers

Ulf / SM6GXV


 

Razvan
I don't have your answer but face a similar issue on my 8970a.
Though I do not have any official HP noise source. I do have noise sources and amplifiers so have tried various levels all with the same result. Fail after 2 seconds. I can easily go to?+6 dbm on a spectrum analyzer as an example.
I set the unit aside for the moment. Its for Ham Radio use and no rush.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL


 

Hello Paul,

I also use my units for Ham Radio and at least I have the 8970A working.
I didn't have time to look at the voltages in the B model.

I have the original HP noise source but as I said I am not sure if it is
OK or not. From what I understood the signal should be +11dBm to
calibrate it. I have a feeling that my B unit has the 5dB pad broken
based on some tests I did from the service manual.

I will need to have a look at it later this year... let me know if you
find something related to Error 13 in your unit.

73!
Razvan

On 26/06/2024 17:44, paulswed via groups.io wrote:
Razvan
I don't have your answer but face a similar issue on my 8970a.
Though I do not have any official HP noise source. I do have noise
sources and amplifiers so have tried various levels all with the same
result. Fail after 2 seconds. I can easily go to?+6 dbm on a spectrum
analyzer as an example.
I set the unit aside for the moment. Its for Ham Radio use and no rush.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
_._,_._,_


 

Razvan
I appreciate your reply. Well thats a surprise. 11dbm as measured on a power meter like a HP436, or a spectrum analyzer?
Thats 100 mw. I never would have thought to go that high for a input.
I looked at the various online information and never really felt that I understood what was required.
I recall there was a test procedure for the HP noise source. It wasn't that high of a power level.
But its been about 6 months and many projects in between.
Thanks for you comments.
Paul
WB8TSL?


 

Hello Paul,

The manual says to use the 346B/C for the calibration which are 15dB ENR
sources. It also says you can use the 346A but you need to add +10dB of
gain. So a minimum of +11dB sounds normal I would say.

I didn't check my sources yet on a spectrum analyzer or with a power
meter, I don't have too much free time for hobbies...

73!
Razvan

On 27/06/2024 15:11, paulswed via groups.io wrote:
Razvan
I appreciate your reply. Well thats a surprise. 11dbm as measured on a
power meter like a HP436, or a spectrum analyzer?
Thats 100 mw. I never would have thought to go that high for a input.
I looked at the various online information and never really felt that I
understood what was required.
I recall there was a test procedure for the HP noise source. It wasn't
that high of a power level.
But its been about 6 months and many projects in between.
Thanks for you comments.
Paul
WB8TSL
_._,_._,_


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Am 27.06.2024 um 13:11 schrieb paulswed:

I appreciate your reply. Well thats a surprise. 11dbm as measured on a power meter like a HP436, or a spectrum analyzer?
Thats 100 mw. I never would have thought to go that high for a input.???? => go back to school !

And 11dB ENR is not the same as 11dBm !


 

On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 14:11, paulswed via <paulswedb=[email protected]> wrote:
Razvan
I appreciate your reply. Well thats a surprise. 11dbm as measured on a power meter like a HP436, or a spectrum analyzer?
Thats 100 mw. I never would have thought to go that high for a input.

The excess noise ratio (ENR) is reference to thermal noise at 290 K - not to 1 mW.

Dr David Kirkby Ph.D
Kirkby Microwave Ltd
Email: drkirkby@...
Web:
Telephone 07910 441670 (UK) or +44 7910 441670 (international)
Registered in England and Wales, company number 08914892.?
Registered office: Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Essex, CM3 6DT