¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

  1. HP-Agilent-Keysight-Equipment
  2. Messages
Expanded Topics Messages
Date
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

A friend of mine used to work as a design engineer for HP at Queensferry in the UK, though he didn't himself work on the 8640B. I asked him about turning off the ALC versus using external attenuators and couplers. He said

---

Turning off the ALC fixed ALC pumping. It doesn¡¯t fix the diode nonlinearity from the detector influencing the output by being a non-linear load, nor the non-linearity of the output amp.

Yes, a coupler with >=40dB isolation would be good. Snag is that broadband HF ones use transformers, and to get higher frequency coverage drives the designers to scoddy little cores. Ferrites do intermod too, so finding a low intermod coupler is difficult.

---

The Clifton Labs website that Thomas referenced has details of couplers that don't have significant IMD so that is the path I am going to choose, leaving the inconvenience of ALC disabling for the day when I can build receivers with substantially more than 100dB IMD dynamic range.

Thanks, Alan G3XAQ
Re: Problem with 3MHz Filter in IF Section 8552B

 

Youre going to have to find your own photo, then post a link to it.

I may be blind, but I can't see anything from you in the Photo's section.

Regards.

Dave B.
Re: Problem with 3MHz Filter in IF Section 8552B

 

I made a folder "8552B 3MHz filter" in Photos sedction, where you can find a screenshot.
Thanks for looking.
Ernst
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

Andy Gardner
 

Thanks Dave, I've annotated my paper copy.

Cheers,

On 23/10/2015, at 11:08 AM, David Wise david_wise@... [hp_agilent_equipment] wrote:

On Figure 16, page 10, the traces are mislabeled. The black traces are the 608, while the blue traces are the 8640.

JFYI,
Dave Wise

-----Original Message-----
From: hp_agilent_equipment@... [mailto:hp_agilent_equipment@...]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:31 PM
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?


Yes there is.

, I believe.
HP-7550 Plotter with HP-8568B

 

Hello Group. ?I have been having a blast with my new to me HP-8568B SA, and since I had an old HP-7550A plotter available, I thought it would be fun to see if I could get them connected together and get some hard copies plotted.


My plotter has both an HP-IB and RS-232 interface and thus I have connected the two instruments together with an HP HP-IB interface cable I assume is good. ?I am not having much luck in knowing where to go next as far as configuring either the plotter or SA to make them see and talk to each other. I have DL the manual for the SA but not for the plotter yet and have not read the SA yet WRT plotter operations.


Is there anyone who can work with me on or off-line to get these two working together? ?TU.


Gedas, W8BYA

Gallery at 
Light travels faster than sound....
This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

Dave Brown
 

Alan-
Not used 8640s for many years so can't answer your query, sorry. Your figures make sense to me, BTW. But check the hybrid isolation at the highest frequency you're going to test at.
If you're looking at SDR rx testing, as opposed to conventional rx architectures- you might like to check this out- implementation depends on whether you can get hold of some old white noise gear.

73
Dave, ZL3FJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "alan@... [hp_agilent_equipment]" <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
To: <hp_agilent_equipment@...>
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?


Thanks, guys. I see the ALC on/off switch S1 on board A26A4 in the manual but it involves opening the diecast box and maybe pulling the board out to toggle the switch, though it's at the top edge of the board and perhaps can be moved with a pointed stick.

The app note fig 14 suggests a hybrid with 40dB isolation will achieve the same result as disabling the ALC. My Hatfield Instruments 6dB hybrid shows 50dB isolation at 14MHz so I am inclined to go that route. Assuming everything is well behaved one might hope that keeping the generators at -10dBm (or maybe as high as 0dBm) would give spurs at least -100dBc, which is the minimum I need for evaluating 100dB DR receivers, and still give me 14dB or more attenuation to dial in with a step attenuator with receiver noise floors around -130dBm.

Does anyone know just how low the IPs go if both the ALC is disabled and a combiner are used?

Do my numbers look realistic, or have I made some idiot arithmetical error?

Thanks, Alan
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

Thanks, guys. I see the ALC on/off switch S1 on board A26A4 in the manual but it involves opening the diecast box and maybe pulling the board out to toggle the switch, though it's at the top edge of the board and perhaps can be moved with a pointed stick.

The app note fig 14 suggests a hybrid with 40dB isolation will achieve the same result as disabling the ALC. My Hatfield Instruments 6dB hybrid shows 50dB isolation at 14MHz so I am inclined to go that route. Assuming everything is well behaved one might hope that keeping the generators at -10dBm (or maybe as high as 0dBm) would give spurs at least -100dBc, which is the minimum I need for evaluating 100dB DR receivers, and still give me 14dB or more attenuation to dial in with a step attenuator with receiver noise floors around -130dBm.

Does anyone know just how low the IPs go if both the ALC is disabled and a combiner are used?

Do my numbers look realistic, or have I made some idiot arithmetical error?

Thanks, Alan
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

On Figure 16, page 10, the traces are mislabeled. The black traces are the 608, while the blue traces are the 8640.

JFYI,
Dave Wise

-----Original Message-----
From: hp_agilent_equipment@... [mailto:hp_agilent_equipment@...]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:31 PM
To: hp_agilent_equipment@...
Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?


Yes there is.

, I believe.

On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:16 AM, alan victor amvictor88@... [hp_agilent_equipment] wrote:



There is an extensive HP application note on using the 8640 specific to IMD. Significant improvements in IMD measurement is realized but not allowing a pair of 8640 generators to modulate each other via their internal ALC loops. Hence, HP provided the ability to TURN THE GENERATOR ALC LOOP OFF. If you pop the hood on the 8640 your should find an ALC switch. Of course, I am going out on a limb and cannot recall if early units had this option, however I do believe the date code your addressing will work this option.


VISIT YOUR GROUP
* New Members 15
* New Photos 3

* Privacy * Unsubscribe * Terms of Use


------------------------------------

------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

[email protected]
 

Yes there is.

, I believe.

On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:16 AM, alan victor amvictor88@... [hp_agilent_equipment] wrote:



There is an extensive HP application note on using the 8640 specific to IMD. Significant improvements in IMD measurement is realized but not allowing a pair of 8640 generators to modulate each other via their internal ALC loops. Hence, HP provided the ability to TURN THE GENERATOR ALC LOOP OFF. If you pop the hood on the 8640 your should find an ALC switch. Of course, I am going out on a limb and cannot recall if early units had this option, however I do believe the date code your addressing will work this option.


VISIT YOUR GROUP
? New Members 15
? New Photos 3

? Privacy ? Unsubscribe ? Terms of Use
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

There is an extensive HP application note on using the 8640 specific to IMD. Significant improvements in IMD measurement is realized but not allowing a pair of 8640 generators to modulate each other via their internal ALC loops. Hence, HP provided the ability to TURN THE GENERATOR ALC LOOP OFF. If you pop the hood on the 8640 your should find an ALC switch. Of course, I am going out on a limb and cannot recall if early units had this option, however I do believe the date code your addressing will work this option.



On Thursday, October 22, 2015 4:35 PM, "Alan Ibbetson alan@... [hp_agilent_equipment]" wrote:


?
Hello Thomas. Thanks very much for those useful references. It seems I
won't be needing external amplifiers for my simple receiver testing.
Jack at Clifton Labs mentions using LPFs to avoid confusion caused by
generator harmonics, but mine are -60dBc so I hope added filtering will
not be necessary.

Thanks everyone. Best wishes, Alan G3XAQ
--

Alan Ibbetson
alan@...
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

Hello Thomas. Thanks very much for those useful references. It seems I won't be needing external amplifiers for my simple receiver testing. Jack at Clifton Labs mentions using LPFs to avoid confusion caused by generator harmonics, but mine are -60dBc so I hope added filtering will not be necessary.

Thanks everyone. Best wishes, Alan G3XAQ
--

Alan Ibbetson
alan@...
Re: Problem with 3MHz Filter in IF Section 8552B

 

Make sure the sweep rates used are commensurate with the IFBW - the shape will appear greatly distorted if sweeping too fast.

Ed
Re: HP-182C repair

[email protected]
 

Dave,

I have an HP182C with a 8559 spectrum analyser plugin. It too has developed a fault that I think is EHT-related.? It was working ok, then the brightness gradually increased but, the brightness control had no effect. I turned it off, waited 30 minutes and turned it on. Nothing showed on the screen.

I haven't stared the fault-finding yet, I was about to post in this forum and you got there first. You're obviously ahead of me in the game, but I wonder what your symptoms were?

73

Chris G3WIE
Looking for maual and or schematic for HP5303A counter

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hello Group,

?

Recently I got a HP 5300 + 5303A counter for free with the comment: ¡±It does not work, maybe you can do something useful with it¡±

?

I opened it (very easy with these modular counters) and was greeted with? beautiful ?classic HP tech!

Also the reason for not working: an IC was completely missing! (It is IC 6 which is de-soldered)

It is a simple counter, but so beautifully made that I would like to restore it.

?

So, may question is: Can someone help me with the manual or schematics of this 5303A counter?

Please note: this counter is part of the 5300 series, and if you look on the Agilent/Keysight 5303A page there is a link to a manual, but the linked manual is for the 5300A, which contains no info whatsoever about the 5303A¡­.. (I already received several 5300A manual from helpful people¡­..)

?

Alternatively, if somebody owns a 5303A, could they look inside to see what type IC6 is? (or make a photo of that print area)

(I did some testing, and the missing IC is the only thing wrong with this counter)

?

I started a topic about this counter on a Dutch forum: ?

I am afraid the text is in Dutch, but the nice Photo¡¯s of the counter and it¡¯s problem are international ;-)

(clicking the photo¡¯s will show bigger versions)

?

Thanks for helping me out in advance, and regards,

Gertjan Miedema.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miedema Geluidstechniek:

Re: Problem with 3MHz Filter in IF Section 8552B

 

Can you post a picture of what you are seeing?

Vladan
Problem with 3MHz Filter in IF Section 8552B

 

Hello,
the 3MHz filter shows the strange characteristic of a critically couple bandpass filter instead of the usual shape. Adjusting coils L2, L4 and R1 gives no improvement. The mica caps in this filter sh?uld be rock stable?! Before I desolder all components for measurement: does anyone have come across this problem before and can give me a hint.

Regards
Ernst
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

For IMD measurements, you can use any coupler that can couple 2 or more generators together with some isolation.?

6dB Hybrid combiners are quite popular and broadband. Same goes for resistive couplers.?
A lot of interesting information on the different couplers can be found here:?

My personal favorite is a Wilkinson splitter. I do most of the measurements on VHF and UHF and with so high levels that a ferrite based coupler wil generate excessive IMD.

The isolation between the generators is normaly not a problem, with the 8640's you will most of the time use 20 or 30dB attenutation on both generators, leading to better than 60dB isolation, even without any isolation in the coupler.?
When measuring on receivers the input signals will often be low, but if measuring IMD on a power amplifier chain, then you may end up needing some external amplifiers that goes after the generators.

A set of good step attenuators after the combiner helps in setting the step level, and determining if the IMD is generated in the coupler or after it.

The book "Experimental methods in RF design" by Hayward, Campbell and Larkin have a good treatment of most IMD measurement setups.

BR.
Thomas LA3PNA.
?

2015-10-22 14:49 GMT+02:00 Alan Ibbetson alan@... [hp_agilent_equipment] <hp_agilent_equipment@...>:

?

Ah, so *that's* how the +20dBm level is reached. I now see the moving
cursor. I thought it was just a scratch on the panel! Thanks, Frank.

So that just leaves my question about the setup needed for receiver IMD
measurements.

Best wishes, Alan G3XAQ




--

?Please? avoid sending? me? Word? or? PowerPoint? attachments.
?See? <>
PDF is an better alternative and there are always LaTeX!
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

Ah, so *that's* how the +20dBm level is reached. I now see the moving cursor. I thought it was just a scratch on the panel! Thanks, Frank.

So that just leaves my question about the setup needed for receiver IMD measurements.

Best wishes, Alan G3XAQ
Re: HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

Hello,

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Alan Ibbetson alan@...
[hp_agilent_equipment] <hp_agilent_equipment@...> wrote:


I'm new to this group. I've diligently searched the archives but can
find no mention of early 8640B models seemingly intended to produce
+10dBm maximum output instead of the more usual +20dBm.

I have a pair of these 8640B signal generators, the early-model one
having been recently purchased so I can make IMD measurements on my
homebrew ham radio receivers. The other one I've had for some years has
the common fault with broken plastic gears and Paul K is helping me out
with this, hence in the meantime me putting the later purchase into
service and being "surprised" at the lower output.

The serial number is 1434U00265, so it's a 1974 model. The output range
switch has a scale marking at -140dBm and also one at +20dBm, but the
switch does not rotate beyond +10dBm. Does anyone know when HP increased
the power output? Does it mean this example doesn't contain the dreaded
monolithic output amplifier? Although the range/deviation switches use
proper wafers instead of microscopic spring fingers on plastic discs the
mechanically mad plastic gears are there so I suspect there will be
service work to do in the future.
I have both models, the output level range is basicly the same on
both, but the one with the amplitude dial with the -140 dBm mark can
go to +20 dBm too using the fine level knob. You'll notice that the
level full scale will change as you move the fine level knob and a
small mark under the large dBm marks moves to indicate the actual
output power.

HTH
Frank IZ8DWF
HP8640B -140/+10dBm instead of -130/+20dBm?

 

I'm new to this group. I've diligently searched the archives but can find no mention of early 8640B models seemingly intended to produce +10dBm maximum output instead of the more usual +20dBm.

I have a pair of these 8640B signal generators, the early-model one having been recently purchased so I can make IMD measurements on my homebrew ham radio receivers. The other one I've had for some years has the common fault with broken plastic gears and Paul K is helping me out with this, hence in the meantime me putting the later purchase into service and being "surprised" at the lower output.

The serial number is 1434U00265, so it's a 1974 model. The output range switch has a scale marking at -140dBm and also one at +20dBm, but the switch does not rotate beyond +10dBm. Does anyone know when HP increased the power output? Does it mean this example doesn't contain the dreaded monolithic output amplifier? Although the range/deviation switches use proper wafers instead of microscopic spring fingers on plastic discs the mechanically mad plastic gears are there so I suspect there will be service work to do in the future.

Is it OK to ask applications questions on here? I'm wondering how much reverse isolation I need between my pair of generators to make accurate IMD measurements? I'll be looking for spurs at the noise floor of the receiver, say -130dBm or lower, and for a decent receiver this will need -30dBm signals from each generator. I'm thinking about, say, a 10dB pad between my hybrid combiner and receiver, with maybe a 20dB pad between each generator and the hybrid. Is this enough to ensure there will be no IMD from the generators caused by the crosstalk between them? Or do I need to think about external amplifiers and yet more attenuators?

Thanks,

Alan G3XAQ
79681 - 79700 of 151550