Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- HP-Agilent-Keysight-Equipment
- Messages
Search
Re: Analog vs Digital Oscilloscopes
Others have explained this adequately so I will only add a voice of
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
agreement and some random additional thoughts. First of all, they are fundamentally different instruments. One is discrete while the other is continuous. Over the years many things that undergone an analog -> digital transition, from "old fashioned analog" to "newer, better digital". That seems to be the root of the general affinity, especially amongst youngsters, for digital oscilloscopes over analog ones. Digital is just better, though they can never seem to tell you why, other than "Because it's...DIGITAL!" The other issue is availability. Most analog design is much harder than most digital design (note to nit-pickers: I said MOST), and most manufacturing of high-end analog hardware is a lot more expensive than most manufacturing of high-end digital hardware. This has led manufacturers to prefer to make and sell digital oscilloscopes over analog ones. Digital oscilloscopes are a lot cheaper to design and make, especially in China where manufacturing volume far exceeds engineering talent. One other issue, though in which direction the causality relationship goes is debatable, is the demise of CRTs. CRTs are inherently continuous devices, while LCDs (and most other flat-screen display technologies) are inherently digital, or discrete, devices. So, let's face it, graphing voltage against time is a process that was essentially perfected a long time ago. The only thing we're really optimizing for anymore in successive generations of oscilloscopes is whiz-bang features (and we're running out of ideas for those) and profit margins. Sure, there are ever-faster 50+GHz instruments, but those are for very specialized applications that almost nobody actually uses, in comparison to the rest of us...but in general, an oscilloscope made last month does pretty much the same thing as an oscilloscope made twenty years ago. For a long while I've been at the point where I can put pretty much any oscilloscope I want on my bench. I own probably thirty oscilloscopes now (I have a "thing" for oscilloscopes!), but I regularly use three on my "ordinary day-to-day work" bench: A Tek 2465A, a Tek 7854 with various plugins, and a Tek TDS3012. Which do I prefer? None! I use the best tool for the job at hand, on a task-by-task basis. Knowing the strengths, weaknesses, and capabilities of each of your instruments is the key. -Dave On 07/20/2017 10:33 AM, bunge@... [hp_agilent_equipment] wrote:
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA |
|||||||||
Probe bandwidth
I am confused regarding the stated bandwidth of an oscilloscope probe.
I thought that the bandwidth was computed from the input impedance, almost purely capacitive at high frequencies. as the frequency where the reactance drops to 50 Ohms. This idea seems to work most of the time but I am seeing some probes with stated bandwidth somewhat higher.? For instance I see some Chinese probes advertised as 100 MHz, 200 MHz, even higher, yet their input capacitance is still around 20 pF more or less. Before you jump down my throat about how terrible Chinese stuff is, let's keep it at a technical level and explain just what bandwidth means so I can decide what to buy. I see probes very cheap (not really rugged but still a good value) for various prices from around $4 to $13 but they appear to be the same, except for the bandwidth rating.? How can this be? Since my use is very casual and I don't need to pay for high quality, this is a somewhat important question.? And of course, after a few years they fall apart and I need to purchase again, but over my lifetime I don't usually get to where I have spent the same money as for a Tek or HP probe. Bob |
|||||||||
Re: OT: Anyone in UK (or Europe) likely to be placing an order with Lemo in the near future
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSadly not ¡ ? From: hp_agilent_equipment@... [mailto:hp_agilent_equipment@...]
Sent: 20 July 2017 12:21 To: hp_agilent_equipment@... Subject: [hp_agilent_equipment] Re: OT: Anyone in UK (or Europe) likely to be placing an order with Lemo in the near future ? ?? requesting a sample. |
|||||||||
Re: Analog vs Digital Oscilloscopes
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHarvey gave you an excellent summary that answers
all your questions. I was typing up a reply when I saw Harvey's
response come in so I canned mine. I would like to add one
little tid-bit.... back in my prior life when I worked in the
lab where we did specialized measurements an analog scope was if
fact a huge asset. It may seem funny that even at a modern and
large aerospace corporation lab that is filled with millions of
dollars worth of the latest digital gear we still had a handful
of maintained & calibrated 7000 series (and other) analog
scopes ! Digital scopes because of their sampling & alias
issues can at times have a hissy fit when you try to properly
display a low frequency signal at the same time you are looking
at a high frequency signal. Analog scopes are much more capable
of doing this and were of great value to us. Gedas, W8BYA Gallery at Light travels faster than sound.... This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. On 7/20/2017 10:33 AM, bunge@...
[hp_agilent_equipment] wrote:
? |
|||||||||
Re: Analog vs Digital Oscilloscopes
On 20 Jul 2017 14:33:12 +0000, you wrote:
Do digital 'scopes replace analog ones?nope. Perhaps this has been covered in which case I apologise.Not surprising. Digital is easier (in a way) to manufacture, offers more bells and whistles and has better connectivity. My experience in 1990 with a DSO was frustrating and, even knowing what was there, I could not get a fast pulse pair to show on the DSO. It showed sine waves. My HP54540 will display a fast pulse pair easily with no confusion, so they have improved.Er... no, you aren't. You've just specialized in older equipment... Digital scopes are sampling scopes, they take a bit of data, rest, take a bit more. What happens between those data samples the scope has no idea, nor can it. Only if a sample happens exactly on something interesting can you see it. Lower frequency repetitive events have the samples jitter (one way to do it) so that they get just about everything. On a single pulse mode, the sampling has to be fast enough to get that pulse reasonably, and at a single try. Analog scopes don't have this problem. I have both. I use both. For low frequency single events (like 50 Mhz or so, I use a 500 Mhz digital scope, or if the rep rate is low, same scope. For looking at high frequency events, some rise times, things above 50 Mhz or so, or if I need some odd plugin that my digital scope won't do, then it's a Tek 7000 with a set of plugins. That goes to 500 Mhz and gracefully dies off in response. The digital scopes have a sharper cutoff to avoid aliasing. If a digital 'scope will replace the Tek 2467B then which one would be a good choice? What are people using these days and is there anything affordable from the late 1990's?If you can, you might want to try the 7000 series, generally a 7904 or a 7904A; both analog. Avoid the 7104 because of the specialized CRT, which has a limited life (although it does have a 1 GHz bandwidth with the right plugins). You might want to check out the Tek TDS 800 (possibly 700) series. The 500 series (which I have, 540A) needs recapping at some point in its life. Ditto I think for the TDS 600 series. Look for reviews on these to find specific weak points. Has anyone successfully replaced the horizontal chip on a Tek 2465/67 with a DIY board?Don't have a 2465. Harvey |
|||||||||
Analog vs Digital Oscilloscopes
Do digital 'scopes replace analog ones? Perhaps this has been covered in which case I apologise. I have a Tek 2467B and two of my friends have Tek 2465 'scopes, one of which has a failed horizontal chip (see the Tek site). There do not appear to be analog replacements for these 'scopes. I looked through HP and Tek catalogs into the mid 1990's and see that HP dropped analog 'scopes completely and Tek does not show a replacement for the 2467B. My experience in 1990 with a DSO was frustrating and, even knowing what was there, I could not get a fast pulse pair to show on the DSO. It showed sine waves. My HP54540 will display a fast pulse pair easily with no confusion, so they have improved. My question is if there is still a place for an analog 'scope? I use mine all the time but I am obsolete. If a digital 'scope will replace the Tek 2467B then which one would be a good choice? What are people using these days and is there anything affordable from the late 1990's? Has anyone successfully replaced the horizontal chip on a Tek 2465/67 with a DIY board? Has anyone got the Thomas Lafay PCB working? I will ask on the Tek site as well. |
|||||||||
Re: H'P606A, 606B Question
Yes, I have a plastic squeeze bottle of it with a needle applicator. Works great.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I wonder, though, on the 606 problems that it could be something besides poor contacts and breaking/making that switch causes the oscillator to "restart". When you rotate it to start it, does it eventually drop out again? Thanks, Barry - N4BUQ ----- Original Message -----
From: "'James R. Bartlett' james.r.bart@... [hp_agilent_equipment]" <hp_agilent_equipment@...> |
|||||||||
OT: Manuals for Datron (Wavetek) 4808 Option 70 Wideband Source
Hi everyone,
I have the Schematics and Parts list for this on loan at present, but I have had no luck finding any other documentation for it. The edition of the user handbook for the 4808 that I have is too early to know about this option. I'm looking for a more up to date version of the 4808 User Manual, and the User and Service documentation for Option 70 Hoping that someone can help with either real "dead tree" manuals or with scans. Thanks Dave |
|||||||||
Re: H'P606A, 606B Question
De oxit is available in non spray form, Comes in a glass bottle,. Check their website maybe somebody in NZ does it. I get mine from the UK, I am in Ireland. Hope this is of use. Regards Jim On 20 July 2017 at 10:50, donald collie donaldbcollie@... [hp_agilent_equipment] <hp_agilent_equipment@...> wrote:
|
|||||||||
Re: H'P606A, 606B Question
Thankyou Barry, and Ron. I should get some deoxit - ?the trouble would be to get it here, because it`s in a spray "bomb", and can`t go by air [I`m in New Zealand].USPS used to have a surface service, but I understand this is no more. Funny thing is : I`ve tried another contact cleaner on the contacts of the osc turret in the 606A, but it`s still doing the same thing as the 606B, which hasn`t had "the treatment" I`m a bit puzzled as to what`s going on, as the oscillators just drop out after a few minutes of correct operation. ie the contact is made satisfactorally, and then for some reason fails to make after a few minutes. I think silver contacts are used. Cheers!.......Don |
|||||||||
Re: 16700A setup
so does that mean I should connect all three pods to AD0-AD4, or just one of them?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Or should that be: pod1 clock -> IA_H_D_L pod2 clock -> IWR_R pod3 clock -> IRD_L pod3 data lines to AD0 to AD4 Thanks Dave -----Original Message-----
From: hp_agilent_equipment@... [mailto:hp_agilent_equipment@...] Sent: 20 July 2017 04:33 To: hp_agilent_equipment@... Subject: Re: [hp_agilent_equipment] 16700A setup You might want to look at using Master/Slave clocks and Demultiplex Mode in the User's Reference manual for whatever analyzer module you are using. You could specify the edge of IA_H_D_L as the Slave clock to latch in the address bits. Then use a combination of either IWR_R Write OR IRD_L Read edges as the Master clock to latch in the data bits from the shared ADx lines. A logic analyzer state isn't saved until the Master clock occurs, along with the data that was latched on the last Slave clock occurrence. ------------------------------------ Posted by: Glen Slick <glen.slick@...> ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links |
|||||||||
Re: On buying gear. A happy story.
Oops, pressed the wrong key.
Picture. The intensified marker shows 33.423 MHz at the bottom just before the sweep makes its big rise. (The detector in the circuit has a negative output.) See Figure 3-2 on page 3-3 when you get the manual. All five markers work correctly. Looks like it needs only feet and cleaning to be ready for you. I need to sell the 8601A too but it may have an output problem. Don't know if I can fix it. Jeremy On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:36 PM Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@...> wrote: OK, it works. Here is a picture of my 8601A and the 8600A looking at a 32-- Sent from my iPad 4. |
|||||||||
Re: On buying gear. A happy story.
OK, it works. Here is a picture of my 8601A and the 8600A looking at a 32 MHz Lo-pass filter on my 175A scope.? On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:57 PM Roy Morgan k1lky68@... [hp_agilent_equipment] <hp_agilent_equipment@...> wrote:
-- 4. |
|||||||||
Re: 16700A setup
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:47 PM, 'David C. Partridge'
david.partridge@... [hp_agilent_equipment] <hp_agilent_equipment@...> wrote: You might want to look at using Master/Slave clocks and Demultiplex Mode in the User's Reference manual for whatever analyzer module you are using. You could specify the edge of IA_H_D_L as the Slave clock to latch in the address bits. Then use a combination of either IWR_R Write OR IRD_L Read edges as the Master clock to latch in the data bits from the shared ADx lines. A logic analyzer state isn't saved until the Master clock occurs, along with the data that was latched on the last Slave clock occurrence. |
|||||||||
Re: 16700A setup
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:47:14 +0100, you wrote:
I have a set of lines as follows:Just offhand: state mode. connect clocks to write strobe and read strobe (two pods). configure clocks to capture this on rising edge of read clock OR with write clock. If you want to see when the address sets up, I'd use either timing mode or yet a third clock for the address strobe and capture data then. timing mode works like a D flipflop, specify a signal on the clock pin and then the edge, qualify as needed. data is stored then. Same data can be viewed in timing mode, but the clock is not an edge change (any) or a timebase, it's the clock pin on the pod as you have defined it. Harvey
|
|||||||||
Re: HP3582A Display unreadable
Have you tried the test switch on A9? You should get two rows of capital A's, a square wave, and two more rows of A's at the bottom.? This "isolates the Processor Ram and the Processor I/O Bus from the Display Section." (I'm quoting the Service Manual here).? It won't give you a smoking gun but will rule out some areas.
Don't feel bad, I was ignored the first time I asked a question about a fixer upper 3582A I bought too.? Got it working finally though. :) Dave |