Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Re: Analog vs Digital Oscilloscopes
Others have explained this adequately so I will only add a voice of
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
agreement and some random additional thoughts. First of all, they are fundamentally different instruments. One is discrete while the other is continuous. Over the years many things that undergone an analog -> digital transition, from "old fashioned analog" to "newer, better digital". That seems to be the root of the general affinity, especially amongst youngsters, for digital oscilloscopes over analog ones. Digital is just better, though they can never seem to tell you why, other than "Because it's...DIGITAL!" The other issue is availability. Most analog design is much harder than most digital design (note to nit-pickers: I said MOST), and most manufacturing of high-end analog hardware is a lot more expensive than most manufacturing of high-end digital hardware. This has led manufacturers to prefer to make and sell digital oscilloscopes over analog ones. Digital oscilloscopes are a lot cheaper to design and make, especially in China where manufacturing volume far exceeds engineering talent. One other issue, though in which direction the causality relationship goes is debatable, is the demise of CRTs. CRTs are inherently continuous devices, while LCDs (and most other flat-screen display technologies) are inherently digital, or discrete, devices. So, let's face it, graphing voltage against time is a process that was essentially perfected a long time ago. The only thing we're really optimizing for anymore in successive generations of oscilloscopes is whiz-bang features (and we're running out of ideas for those) and profit margins. Sure, there are ever-faster 50+GHz instruments, but those are for very specialized applications that almost nobody actually uses, in comparison to the rest of us...but in general, an oscilloscope made last month does pretty much the same thing as an oscilloscope made twenty years ago. For a long while I've been at the point where I can put pretty much any oscilloscope I want on my bench. I own probably thirty oscilloscopes now (I have a "thing" for oscilloscopes!), but I regularly use three on my "ordinary day-to-day work" bench: A Tek 2465A, a Tek 7854 with various plugins, and a Tek TDS3012. Which do I prefer? None! I use the best tool for the job at hand, on a task-by-task basis. Knowing the strengths, weaknesses, and capabilities of each of your instruments is the key. -Dave On 07/20/2017 10:33 AM, bunge@... [hp_agilent_equipment] wrote:
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss