开云体育

NO, because shipping it in the usual foam-lined cardboard box would have been disastrous. HPAK ships most of their instruments via FedEx, and the lone truck drivers would have had a tough time with a

(Here in the US engineering decisions are often dictated by legal concerns, you have a 75lbs box in Europe the ME design the straps to hold 85 or 90lbs just in case…. In the US they go more for like

Here in the US engineering decisions are often dictated by legal concerns, you have a 75lbs box in Europe the ME design the straps to hold 85 or 90lbs just in case…. In the US they go more for like

Actually HP did have a problem with the 70004 display and the side caring handle And from memory the instruction was to remove one handle that was suspect Paul

I carried my B40 inside, but I never considered taking it down the stairs to my lab area, alone. The B40 is a beast but one hell of an interesting receiver! Please do check in on the Murphy B40 user

We had an enquiry about a B40 radio they are 114 Lbs and I cared my first one at age 15 and moved one last Xmas and I am now 64 Going to the pub now

Ohhhh, I live in the land of Lawyers (DC Metro Area). Their lawyers could careless, I suspect the engineers were more responsible for this decision. I have to say, back in my twenties, I would have

-------- This observation is unusual. If U2 is working well pins 5&7 should be very stiff, like an opamp +/- terminals with feedback applied. If you could move pins 5&7 by 270mV but output only

A pallet and a forklift for 90lbs? Wow, wimps. Seriously. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

Does anyone here really seriously think that HP would have put a flimsy side handle on a 45 lb. box? Shucks, their lawyers wouldn't have allowed it! I've dealt with their 90+ lb. PNA-X instrument,

Feel priviledged if you never had to tote a 8673D around ? or a PNA-X Instruments have gotten lighter mostly because the older instruments all used transformers and now everything is SMPS also they

Unfortunately, this one is going to my office, and back home again with me. Long story short, I have a “special case” employee who begins to lose his mind if you grab the Advantest VNA and put it

I use plenty of high end test equipment, I own some too. Problem is, not many of those weigh as much. Sign of the times I suppose. When I went to pick this up, was a bit surprised at its weight. I

Lol Tucker went out of business years ago ? I understand your concerns and its natural to be suspicious of the straps but I suggest if you get the time take a strap of and take a closer look at the

Forgive me for jumping in, but I must echo Lothar's comments about these straps. I have several hundred HP instruments here, and have had several hundred more go through my hands over the years. I

Ok I will take your word for it. The side straps do not instill a lot of confidence, but if you say you never seen them break, then I will just send this one to Tucker C/O Lothar when it does :)

Btw I considered this in the calculation ? the beauty of having simulation modules in solidworks Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows Sent: Friday, February

Plus they were side-loaded, not being pulled straight out. That leverage counts for a lot. Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 3:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re:

Thanks Tom for clarifying that the inductance of the transformer is predominant over the parasitic inductance of the resistors. - - Cheers Attilio

Bottom line is that with the weight of the 8753 there is no conceivable way the strap can fail , I fixed and handled hundrets of 8753 and other instruments at tucker and don’t remember ever a strap