¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Source for HP System 2 case cover retaining screws

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

When working on a missile in the navy, we used modeling clay to contain the swath from a drilling operation.

Glenn

On 12/16/2024 3:47 AM, W6KX via groups.io wrote:

Hear, hear! I would participate in a group buy.

In addition, has anyone a recommendation on re-threading the receiving end of these screws? I have done HELICOILs but containing debris from drilling and such makes it a dicey operation.

I have an 8664A in which I now hope to never find the cut off end of the HELICOIL.

Mike


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Little                ARRL Technical Specialist   QCWA  LM 28417
Amateur Callsign:  WB4UIV            wb4uiv@...    AMSAT LM 2178
QTH:  Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx)  USSVI, FRA, NRA-LM    ARRL TAPR
"It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class
of the Amateur that holds the license"


Re: 3577A multiple problems - update

 

I had similar experiences "back in the day" with PDP-11 based voice banking systems.? Thousands and thousands of TTL chips many with sockets then huge wire-wrapped backplanes.? A nightmare of millions of connections any one of which could turn intermittent at any time.? Countless frustrating hours with the old huge Gould logic analyzers.? The big improvements in reliability of more modern systems came about due to the elimination of so many connection points being replaced by much higher integration in chips.

Not sure if you saw my later post about how removing the fast processor board eliminates the unlock and CPU error messages. There's a lot of interaction and the fast processor has tentacles throughout the instrument.? As a goof I pulled the fast processor address latches (a couple of 74S374 chips) and tried running the thing, but it really didn't like that and hung up pretty early on so it doesn't tell me much.? I put a couple of machined pin sockets in those locations in case I might need to pull those chips again.? I'm not sure this troubleshooting route will be fruitful.

I don't have extenders so probing is very unwieldy.? I have a good setup of scopes and logic analyzers but such troubleshooting can be VERY time consuming.? I have a line on securing a replacement unit and will go that route.? After I do the experiments I needed this for in the first place, I will try board swapping to at least know which board it is, then maybe spot a replacement somewhere.

There is also the possibility things are going wrong because of the bad trace memory chips so I will see if anything is different once the replacements arrive and are installed.

Peter

On 12/16/2024 8:57 AM, Dave_G0WBX via groups.io wrote:

Re:-

I wonder if I could pull them, read them out and reprogram onto new chips.? If one is on the edge that might fix it.? EPROMs do go bad...


Good, if you can be sure you read the EPROM as originally programmed, not while it is in it's faulty state.

As others have said, it could also be a bad bus transceiver/buffer, either not pulling it's output all the way up or down, or "leaking" significantly when it's output is supposed to be in it's high z state, or it's input thresholds have changed.

A memory address decoder problem can cause mayhem too, for example two chips intermittently being selected at the same time will cause trouble.? One of the more difficult faults to trace.

I'd get a decent 'scope, trigger it from a bus access qualifier related with instruction fetching, and look for bus contention, or "weak" signals.? (Analogue 'scopes are often better at that sort of work.? DSO's often lie like a cheap watch, unless you take "Greate Care" to ensure you have one with sufficient sampling rate, and trace memory to catch the fastest signal on the board in full fidelity, often the CPU clock, but not always.? Even then some miss glitches.

If the general logic is all on sockets, just "refreshing" the IC seating can often help, but doing that one chip at a time takes too long, so general the whole board is done and tried again.

At worst, the "fault" might then be permanent, and may be easier to track down.

I learnt that, when I used to fault find to component level on the old Data General Nova 3 and 4 series minicomputers "Back in the day", as well as the third party peripherals they used. Disc controllers and a semi autonomous Mass Spectrometer I/O board.? Often with some 200 TTL IC's on them!? (15 inch square multi-layer boards!)

One particularly troublesome mixed signal board I recall, over many days of odd bits of spare time, to prove a point, I removed each analogue and digital IC and it's socket in turn, and refitted that IC directly soldered to the board in the same position whence it had come from.

The exception was any IC that had a direct connection off-board.? They got expensive turned pin sockets. ? ALL the problems then vanished and never came back!? The result was so profound (the board in question had been officially scrapped as BER. ) The company started making those boards in that style, even using the same style turned pin sockets!? Product reliability with the end customers went up enormously, and our in house service workload reduced to sensible proportions.

Regards.

Dave 'KBV




Re: 3577A multiple problems - update

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re:-

I wonder if I could pull them, read them out and reprogram onto new chips.? If one is on the edge that might fix it.? EPROMs do go bad...


Good, if you can be sure you read the EPROM as originally programmed, not while it is in it's faulty state.

As others have said, it could also be a bad bus transceiver/buffer, either not pulling it's output all the way up or down, or "leaking" significantly when it's output is supposed to be in it's high z state, or it's input thresholds have changed.

A memory address decoder problem can cause mayhem too, for example two chips intermittently being selected at the same time will cause trouble.? One of the more difficult faults to trace.

I'd get a decent 'scope, trigger it from a bus access qualifier related with instruction fetching, and look for bus contention, or "weak" signals.? (Analogue 'scopes are often better at that sort of work.? DSO's often lie like a cheap watch, unless you take "Greate Care" to ensure you have one with sufficient sampling rate, and trace memory to catch the fastest signal on the board in full fidelity, often the CPU clock, but not always.? Even then some miss glitches.

If the general logic is all on sockets, just "refreshing" the IC seating can often help, but doing that one chip at a time takes too long, so general the whole board is done and tried again.

At worst, the "fault" might then be permanent, and may be easier to track down.

I learnt that, when I used to fault find to component level on the old Data General Nova 3 and 4 series minicomputers "Back in the day", as well as the third party peripherals they used.? Disc controllers and a semi autonomous Mass Spectrometer I/O board.? Often with some 200 TTL IC's on them!? (15 inch square multi-layer boards!)

One particularly troublesome mixed signal board I recall, over many days of odd bits of spare time, to prove a point, I removed each analogue and digital IC and it's socket in turn, and refitted that IC directly soldered to the board in the same position whence it had come from.

The exception was any IC that had a direct connection off-board.? They got expensive turned pin sockets. ? ALL the problems then vanished and never came back!? The result was so profound (the board in question had been officially scrapped as BER. ) The company started making those boards in that style, even using the same style turned pin sockets!? Product reliability with the end customers went up enormously, and our in house service workload reduced to sensible proportions.

Regards.

Dave 'KBV




Re: Source for HP System 2 case cover retaining screws

 

As far as I'm aware, there are two variants of this screw with different thread sizing: a 6-32 0.46-in variant and an M3.5x0.6mm 12mm-LG variant. I've seen the 6-32 come only in Pozidriv and the M3.5 come in both Pozidriv and Torx T15 variants. In my limited sample, I've found the M3.5 to be more common (even on US equipment). Here are the part numbers I was able to locate for them.

The HP 0570-1171 is a pozi 6-32 0.46-in screw. This part number is given (probably among other places) in the HP 8566B RF section volume 1 manual (2410A series Dec '84) in the general parts listing on page 11.

The HP 0515-1245 is a Torx T15 M3.5x0.6 12mm screw (description: "Screw-Specialty 90-DEG-FLT-HD Torx-T15 M3.5X0.6 12mm-LG SST-300 Passivated"). I've found this mentioned in at least two places: an HP 16700B and a new HP 8566B manual (I can provide manual details if you want, just ask). Unfortunately, there is some inconsistency in manual descriptions. The 16700B manual lists this as a M3.5 screw whereas the 8566B manual lists it as a 6-32 screw. But, Keysight currently lists it as a M3.5, so that's what I've been taking as the truth.

I was also able to locate the following part numbers for the retaining ring: 0510-0043 and 0510-0952.

If you find yourself with the problem of having too much money and want to shed some of it, you can still order the Torx M3.5 screw from Keysight: ($5 each). You can order the retaining ring too: . I never had much luck finding these in the secondary marketplace, but maybe you'll fare better.

If you do find another source, let me know as I might be interested.

Matt


On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 11:15?PM Guy Dunphy via <guykd=[email protected]> wrote:
I'm trying to find a source for the countersunk, odd-shape screws used to secure the sliding top and bottom covers of Hewlett Packard System 2 cases. The screws that are held in place with a circlip that fits in a groove in the screw. And one screw secures each cover. I've put some pics here: Quite commonly I encounter old HP gear with one of these special screws missing. Once or twice I've gone so far as to machine replacements from larger screws. But that is a pain. I'd like to buy a quantity of these, maybe 50? Or more. But even a few would help. I've searched ebay and Aliexpress without any luck. One problem is that search terms like "HP screws" lead off into the HP laptop wastelands. Does anyone know of a source of new ones, or a scrapper selling used ones in some quantity? Also knowing a HP part number might help find a source.


Re: HP equipment

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re:-

As rarely happens there is some HP equipment (an 8712 vna and a hp3586) for sale here in Australia.
?
See the website.


And an 8566B.

Dave 'KBV



Re: Source for HP System 2 case cover retaining screws

 

Yes, =everyone= that works on old HP gear must struggle to find these screws. You'd think that by now some Aliexpress seller would be offering nice shiny stainless steel ones, with matching circlips, for $5 per hundred. Not to mention the metric and imperial versions of HP-IB cable fasteners.
?
Btw, when metal-working on frame parts of instruments too complicated to remove the metal part from the electronics, there's a fairly easy and safe way to manage the swarf. Gaffer tape and newspaper. Construct a barrier so there is no way any chips can go where they should not. You can also use the sticky side of the tape as a capture surface.


Re: 3577A multiple problems - update

 

As for RAM versus ROM problems: it might be that the firmware is copied from ROM to RAM before it is started in earnest.

I have worked on a design like that in the dim past. Reason for doing this: 32 bit wide RAM ran a lot faster than 16 bit wide 27512 EPROMs. Using a 68020 at the time by the way.

So.. bad RAM could also haunt you for program code...


Re: 3577A multiple problems

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi Peter,

?

I haven't had time to follow all the emails regarding your 3577A because I'm quite busy at the moment, but I'm sending you this email anyway for information, it's a copy of an email I sent in 2018.

I had multiple problems on my 3577A...but no doubt you've already checked all that regarding the power supply.

?

?

?

On 12/14/2018 5:29 PM, Yves Tardif wrote:

> Hi,

> I bought a 3577A several years ago and I had a few times the UNLOCK

> message that appeared on the screen with a BEEP sound and lasted less than a second.

> I thought then that it was the instability of the PLL 10MHz when

> powering on, and the problem disappeared after a few minutes.

> Over time, the problem was more common and seemed independent of the

> temperature or operating time of the device. But that did not prevent

> me from using it.

> Recently, the problem became more serious, and the UNLOCK message

> appeared with the indication of a possible failure on the A5, A6 or A7 PCBs.

> So, I decided to look for the problem so I checked the A5, A6 and A7 PCBs.

> The power supplies were stable and rated, the problem was that the

> phase detector was no longer receiving feedback from the VCO.

> The circuit is a little complex, but I realized that everything was

> pointing to the synthesizer, a custom HP circuit.

> I noticed when scanning the VCO spectrum that sometimes it stops for a

> fraction of a second or more without UNLOCK and then suddenly continues scanning.

> On the screen the sweep continued, or sometimes stopped like the VCO.

> Several other more rare symptoms were added like, the frozen screen

> and a PRESET solved the problem, unwanted characters on the screen,

> message ERROR SYTEM # 24 ...

> I thought then maybe the processor card was the cause of the problem.

> I had already checked the test points at the main power supply and

> everything was ok. So, I put an oscilloscope in ROLL mode and monitor

> the different voltages for a period of time where there was the

> problem ... everything was stable.

> So, I decided to monitor the voltage all over the motherboard, and

> finally, I discovered that during the intermittent problem, + 5V

> suddenly decreased during the period, as low as + 3.9V.

> The + 5V of the motherboard comes from a pair of AWG12 or AWG14

> soldered wire that goes to the main power supply where it connects via

> a connector (it passes 10A by this link).

> The connector was not damaged, no sign of overheating.

> After several unsuccessful attempts to repair this connector, I

> decided to directly solder the pair of wires from the motherboard

> directly to the power supply.

> Since that time, all the intermittent problems that they have disappeared.

> My 3577A has never worked so well.

> For those who have a 3577A and have this kind of intermittent

> behavior, the J8 connector may be the cause.

>?

> Yves

>?

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de Peter Gottlieb via groups.io
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 13 d¨¦cembre 2024 22:12
??: [email protected]
Objet?: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] 3577A multiple problems

?

Today I fired up my 3577A to begin to do some tests.? It has been sitting in my lab, fully environmentally controlled, for several years unpowered.? It was working perfectly when it was put away.

?

Immediately I got a trace memory failure, shows as banks 2 and 6.

?

I ran further tests and got failures:

Log sweep signal level test

Log sweep flatness test

Linear sweep signal level test

Linear sweep flatness test

Synthesizer and LO test

?

So I checked the power supplies and reference, all look great.? Hmmm, what could be a common cause then?

?

I started with the trace memory.? I put in a bunch of sockets and moved around chips.? Indeed two of the 2k x 8 Toshiba RAM chips appear to be bad as the failure follows them to whatever bank I plug them into.

?

Anyone else just have these chips die while sitting around unused?

?

As I need to order replacements I will have some time to probe around.? Apparently something else has failed just sitting around.

?

Any thoughts as to where I should start?

?


Re: Source for HP System 2 case cover retaining screws

 

Hear, hear! I would participate in a group buy.

In addition, has anyone a recommendation on re-threading the receiving end of these screws? I have done HELICOILs but containing debris from drilling and such makes it a dicey operation.

I have an 8664A in which I now hope to never find the cut off end of the HELICOIL.

Mike


Source for HP System 2 case cover retaining screws

 

I'm trying to find a source for the countersunk, odd-shape screws used to secure the sliding top and bottom covers of Hewlett Packard System 2 cases. The screws that are held in place with a circlip that fits in a groove in the screw. And one screw secures each cover. I've put some pics here: http://everist.org/pics/HPscrews Quite commonly I encounter old HP gear with one of these special screws missing. Once or twice I've gone so far as to machine replacements from larger screws. But that is a pain. I'd like to buy a quantity of these, maybe 50? Or more. But even a few would help. I've searched ebay and Aliexpress without any luck. One problem is that search terms like "HP screws" lead off into the HP laptop wastelands. Does anyone know of a source of new ones, or a scrapper selling used ones in some quantity? Also knowing a HP part number might help find a source.


Re: Perpetual licence fees - what's the best option?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yep...the frog in a pot on the stove.....clueless too!
¸é±ð²Ô¨¦±ð

On 12/15/24 1:56 PM, Dave McGuire via groups.io wrote:


? "You will own nothing and be happy".

? Explanations of this, why it is bad, why it is unnecessary, and why people should avoid it are met with blank stares.? The same kind of blank stares that result from people being told about "free" online services, the fact being that if you receive value for free, you are the product.? People just don't get it.

? People are generally clueless.? I've all but given up trying to save them from their own stupidity.? You can only yell "you are heading toward a cliff!" for so long before it becomes tiresome.

?????????? -Dave



Re: 3577A multiple problems - update

 

Well, here's something interesting.? I wondered if the unit would run without the fast processor card installed, and it does.

Of course, the analyzer doesn't actually function, but it also doesn't crash, no error messages that I was having before, no unlock messages.? Something on that board must be interfering with the main processor board.

Peter

On 12/15/2024 2:55 PM, Wilko Bulte via groups.io wrote:
Bad trace memory should not give illegal instruction traps. Assuming the trace memory is solely used to store data, and is not (also) used to store executable code in. Unless, of course, something is corrupting the data path, common to both instruction and data transfers.

You have returned the suspect RAM chips to their original location?




Re: 3577A multiple problems - update

 

What is a "BUS ERROR" anyway?

Guessing this is triggered from the BERR/ input to the MC68000 going low.? A bunch of conditions seem to trigger this but it looks like attempts to write to ROM or access of high addresses that aren't used will do it.? I do get an error saying it is trying to access address 1862F3A which is out of range considering this processor can only address to 07FFFFF.? Not even sure how it "understands" an address up there.

But, yeah, it had to be a ROM program error, although the ROM checksum test passes.

I believe code is only stored in the ROM chips with no code stored in RAM, but I could be wrong.

Right now I'm suspecting a ROM error of some kind.

I have an opportunity to buy another unit from a friend and I may do just that.? I have limited time to mess around.? I could tell pretty quickly by board swap where the problem lies with this unit, after I run the experiments I need to run which were the reason I pulled this out of storage.

Peter

On 12/15/2024 2:55 PM, Wilko Bulte via groups.io wrote:
Bad trace memory should not give illegal instruction traps. Assuming the trace memory is solely used to store data, and is not (also) used to store executable code in. Unless, of course, something is corrupting the data path, common to both instruction and data transfers.

You have returned the suspect RAM chips to their original location?




Re: Perpetual licence fees - what's the best option?

 

Yup, waste of time.

Peter

On 12/15/2024 4:56 PM, Dave McGuire via groups.io wrote:
On 12/15/24 14:31, Frank Mashockie via groups.io wrote:
This also goes back to right to repair and the lengths companies from all industries are going to 'protect' IP.? Which I still can't believe there were people in this group arguing for company practices like this in the last discussion I was involved in on this topic.
Also, I wouldn't underestimate your need for instrument support with newer equipment.? I work in the biotech industry as an in-house Lab Instrument Engineer.? And for newer equipment, manufacturers are locking down the equipment so that any time you need to perform a repair you NEED to utilize add-on software that allows a manufacturer tech to remotely access the instrument to resolve the issue.? This isn't a feature, it is required!? I suspect any manufacturers of equipment not under scrunity of recent changes to copyright law (ensuring that customers get access to service codes, passwords, etc) will continue these kinds of practices.? That includes electronic test equipment.
I tell my colleagues the same thing that others have said here. Unless you really need the newest equipment because it encompasses technology that will truly advance our science, go with something that is 15-20 years old (or more).? You'll be able to service it without the expensive service contracts these OEMs push in lieu of supporting customer/3rd party repair.? This will keep upfront AND long-term costs way down.
? "You will own nothing and be happy".

? Explanations of this, why it is bad, why it is unnecessary, and why people should avoid it are met with blank stares.? The same kind of blank stares that result from people being told about "free" online services, the fact being that if you receive value for free, you are the product.? People just don't get it.

? People are generally clueless.? I've all but given up trying to save them from their own stupidity.? You can only yell "you are heading toward a cliff!" for so long before it becomes tiresome.

?????????? -Dave


Re: Perpetual licence fees - what's the best option?

 

On 12/15/24 14:34, Paul Amaranth wrote:
Jamovi looks interesting, but there are lots of moving parts under the hood
(embedded web server + web browser in a virual environment ...).
Whoa.. /me cancels download

-Dave

--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA


Re: Perpetual licence fees - what's the best option?

 

On 12/15/24 14:31, Frank Mashockie via groups.io wrote:
This also goes back to right to repair and the lengths companies from all industries are going to 'protect' IP.? Which I still can't believe there were people in this group arguing for company practices like this in the last discussion I was involved in on this topic.
Also, I wouldn't underestimate your need for instrument support with newer equipment.? I work in the biotech industry as an in-house Lab Instrument Engineer.? And for newer equipment, manufacturers are locking down the equipment so that any time you need to perform a repair you NEED to utilize add-on software that allows a manufacturer tech to remotely access the instrument to resolve the issue.? This isn't a feature, it is required!? I suspect any manufacturers of equipment not under scrunity of recent changes to copyright law (ensuring that customers get access to service codes, passwords, etc) will continue these kinds of practices.? That includes electronic test equipment.
I tell my colleagues the same thing that others have said here.? Unless you really need the newest equipment because it encompasses technology that will truly advance our science, go with something that is 15-20 years old (or more).? You'll be able to service it without the expensive service contracts these OEMs push in lieu of supporting customer/3rd party repair.? This will keep upfront AND long-term costs way down.
"You will own nothing and be happy".

Explanations of this, why it is bad, why it is unnecessary, and why people should avoid it are met with blank stares. The same kind of blank stares that result from people being told about "free" online services, the fact being that if you receive value for free, you are the product. People just don't get it.

People are generally clueless. I've all but given up trying to save them from their own stupidity. You can only yell "you are heading toward a cliff!" for so long before it becomes tiresome.

-Dave

--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA


Re: 3577A multiple problems - update

 

Could be pretty much anything on either of the two largest cards in the analyzer.? Plus stuff not on those cards.? And yes I agree it smells like a ROM going bad.? I wonder if I could pull them, read them out and reprogram onto new chips.? If one is on the edge that might fix it.? EPROMs do go bad...

If it's a random bus transceiver somewhere, ugh.

Peter

On 12/15/2024 2:46 PM, Wilko Bulte via groups.io wrote:
Buss errors and illegal instructions smell like bad RAM, ROM or maybe both. Or a bad bus transceiver maybe. Can be other things too, anything dodgy in address decoding, address bus or data bus can also do it ??





Re: Perpetual licence fees - what's the best option?

 

I ran into the "special service software" issue with a newer R&S transceiver.? Even the ability to swap major assemblies is limited unless you have the special software, which isn't available outside of R&S, nor will they talk to you unless you have a support account with them.? This is needed to support the most basic radio functionality.? No thanks.

Make manufacturers of test equipment state very clearly up front what you are buying and what you are licensing for a limited time. Also, whether licenses are transferable should the underlying hardware fail.? Something like "This functionality requires a subscription and is non-transferable."

I, too, am highly reluctant to deal with licenses.? I am going through such a hassle right now with Schneider PLC components.

Peter

On 12/15/2024 2:31 PM, Frank Mashockie via groups.io wrote:
This also goes back to right to repair and the lengths companies from all industries are going to 'protect' IP.? Which I still can't believe there were people in this group arguing for company practices like this in the last discussion I was involved in on this topic.
Also, I wouldn't underestimate your need for instrument support with newer equipment.? I work in the biotech industry as an in-house Lab Instrument Engineer.? And for newer equipment, manufacturers are locking down the equipment so that any time you need to perform a repair you NEED to utilize add-on software that allows a manufacturer tech to remotely access the instrument to resolve the issue.? This isn't a feature, it is required!? I suspect any manufacturers of equipment not under scrunity of recent changes to copyright law (ensuring that customers get access to service codes, passwords, etc) will continue these kinds of practices.? That includes electronic test equipment.
I tell my colleagues the same thing that others have said here.? Unless you really need the newest equipment because it encompasses technology that will truly advance our science, go with something that is 15-20 years old (or more).? You'll be able to service it without the expensive service contracts these OEMs push in lieu of supporting customer/3rd party repair.? This will keep upfront AND long-term costs way down.


HP 8753A - Want to create/modify user cal kit (using front panel interaction) so that 85033D is resident in storage RAM

 

On HP 8753A, I'm having trouble using front panel interaction to modify an existing cal kit standards to yield a user cal kit (planning 7MM modified to clone 85033D). Looking for help, hand-holding, pointer to suitable how-to, or other resource. I'm not equipped to use GPIB/HPIB, VNA Cal Kit Manager, or GPIB/HPIB floppy drive such as 9122C, so I'm endeavoring to work out the front panel menu system to achieve this.

(details)

I've now got my 8753A set so that the onboard persistent storage (0.22 Farad supercap, about 4 days' life) is kept going with three AA cells (tethered to the supercap via a blocking diode and 10K series resistor); after a week it's stable at 4.4V (fail threshold is around 2V), I'm expecting months of life at least, so I'd now like to perform the task for which I set up this standby power modification.

The 8753A (and successors, evidently with minor variations) has menu directives to modify an existing cal kit (or create from scratch) yielding a (single) user cal kit which can be named and saved.

I'm not set up to connect via HPIB/GPIB and don't have a working 9122C external floppy drive. As I expect my battery/supercap standby supply to provide very long service life, I don't expect to have to re-do the front panel procedure often, so my goal is just to capture the correct key sequence, do and verify the sequence, and go from there.

For the user kit, I'd like use 85033D parameters. I've read through the section of the 8753A user manual 08753-90015 on modifying/creating a user cal kit (later part of section 5), as well as HP's 8510-5B (5956-4352). I'm at the stage "that sort of makes sense" but it's clear that the user cal kit mechanism has to accommodate a large range of use cases, so it's flexible and general purpose, perhaps making the procedure somewhat opaque.

My initial attempts (at modifying the 7mm cal kit as a starting point, as unlike the 85033C and 85032/36 the male/female open and short cal standards have apparently same characteristic parameters) have not been at all successful, so I'm looking for assistance/guidance.

Thanks for any comments, requests for clarification, or pointers to better venue for fielding this question!


Re: 3577A multiple problems - update

 

Bad trace memory should not give illegal instruction traps. Assuming the trace memory is solely used to store data, and is not (also) used to store executable code in. Unless, of course, something is corrupting the data path, common to both instruction and data transfers.

You have returned the suspect RAM chips to their original location?