Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- HP-Agilent-Keysight-Equipment
- Messages
Search
CHECK OUT THE WIKI The purpose of the wiki is mainly to allow you to find information on instruments, either from either
- The model number
- The function(s) listed below. Some instruments have multiple functions - for example, the 4195A is a VNA, spectrum analyzer and an impedance analyzer. Therefore the 4195A is listed in multiple categories
Please also check out HPWiki available here:
- Accessory kits - various types
- AC power analyzers - PA2201A and PA2203A
- AC power supplies 6811C, 6812C, 6813C
- Airlines
- Arbitrary waveform generators M8194A
- Amplifiers?493A, 495A?
- Attenuators (optical) 8156A, 8157A, 8158B, 81566A, 81576A,?
- Attenuators (RF) 8494A
- Attenuator set (500 ¦¸) 350C
- Attenuator set (600 ¦¸) 350D
- Attenuator switch driver
- Audio analyzers? 8903A, 8903B, 8903E,? ?
- Base station test sets
- Bit error rate testers (BERTs)
- Cables
- Capacitance meters U1701A, U1701B, 4272A, 4278A, 4279A
- Capacitor Bridge 4270A,
- Capacitor standards 16380A, 16380C,?
- Carrier noise test setsi
- Cesium frequency standards
- Clamp ammeters
- Close field probes
- Crystal Impedance E4915A, E4916A
- Data Acquisition Systems (DAQs)
- DC power analyzers
- DC power supplies 6030A , 6031A , 6032A, 6033A, 6035A, 6131C, 6621A, 6622A, 6623A, 6624A, 6627A, 6255A, 6645A, 6671A, 6672A, 6673A, 6674A, 6675A, 62003A, 62003C, 62003E, 62004A, 62004B, 62004E, 62005A, 62005B, 62005E, 62006A, 62006B, 62006E, 62010A, 62010C, 62010E, 62012A, 62012C, 62012E, 62015A, 62015C, 62015E, 62018A, 62018C, 62018E, 62024A, 62024C, 62024E, 62028A, 62028C, 62028E, 62048A, 62048C, 62048E
- Delay lines
- Detectors
- Device current waveform analyzers
- Digital communications analyzers
- Directional couplers
- Distortion analyzers 330B, 330C, 330D, 331A, 332A, 333A, 334A, 339A, 8903A, 8903B, 8903E,???
- Dynamic measurement DC source
- Electrometers
- Fading simulators
- Femto ammeters
- Filters
- Frequency counters 522B, 5342A 5343A 5352B
- Frequency standards?
- Function Generators ? 3310A,? 8165A,
- GPIB controllers, extenders, cables etc.
- GPS frequency standards
- Harmonic mixers
- High resistance meters 4339B
- High resistance meter fixtures 16008B
- HEV EV Grid Emulators and Test Systems
- In-circuit test systems
- Impedance analyzers 4195A, 4291A, 4291B, 4395A, 4396A, 4396B, 4294A, E4990A, E4991A
- Impedance Analyzer Accessories
- Impedance / Gain Phase analyzer 4194A
- Impedance Meter 4193A,
- Isolators
- LCR meters? U1701A, U1701B, U1731A,? U1731B, U1731C, U1732A, U1732B, U1732C, U1733C, 4191A , 4192A, 4194A, 4195A, E4196A,? 4216A, 4260A, 4261A, 4262A? 4263A, 4263B, 4271B, 4274A, 4275A, 4276A , 4277A, 4284A, 4285A, 4286A, 4287A, 4291A, 4291B, 4294A, 4332A, 4342A, 4395A, 4396A, 4396B, E4980A and E4980AL
- LCR meter calibration devices? 16380A 42030A? 42090A, 42091A and 42100A
- LCR meter accessories
- 2-Terminal BNCs.
- 4-Terminal Pair (BNC connectors)
- Cable extension 16048A, 16048D, 16048E, 16048G, 16048H
- DC current bias accessories 42841A, 42842A, 42842B, 42842C, 42843A
- DC voltage bias accessories 16065A, 16065C,
- Kelvin clips 16089A, 16089B, 16089C,16089E
- Lead Components 16047A,16047B, 16047D, 16047E
- Material 16451B, 16452A
- Probes 42941A
- SMD 16034E, 16034G, 16034H
- 2-port 16096A
- 7 mm (APC7)
- 2-Terminal BNCs.
- LCZ meters? 4276A, 4277A,
- Lightwave clock / data receivers
- Lightwave converter
- Lightwave component analyzer
- Lightwave measurement system mainframes
- Lightwave polarization analyzers 8509B
- Logic analyzers
- Nemo wireless network solutions.
- Noise and interference test set
- Noise figure analyzers
- Noise sources 346A, 346B. 346C ,
- Matching pads (50 ohm to 75 ohm or similar)
- Materials test equipment
- Microwave repeaters
- Microwave downconverters 70427A
- Microwave / THz sources
- Milliammeter 428B
- Milliohm meter
- Mobile communications DC source
- Modular instruments
- AXIe
- Data acquisition (DAQ)
- USB
- PXIe
- Modulation analyzers
- Multimeters 427A, 970A
- Optical attenuators
- Optical heads
- Optical sources
- Optical spectrum analyzers
- Oscilloscopes 120A, 120AR, 120B, 122A, 130A, 130B, 130BR, 130C, 140A, 140B, 141A, 150A, 150AR, 160B, 180A, 180AR, 180CD, 181A, 181AR, 181T, 181TR, 182C, 182T, 183A, 183B, 184A, 184B, 185A, 185B, 1200A, 1200B, 1220A, 1221A, 1703A, 1707A, 1707B, 1710A, 1710B, 1715A, 1722A, 1725A, 1726A, 1740A, 1741A, 1742A, 1743A, 1744A, 1746A, 1980A, 1980B, 5403A, 6000A, 6000L, 16533A, 16534A, 54100A, 5410B, 54100C, 5100D, 54111D, 54120A, 54120B, 54200A, 54501A, 54502A, 54503A, 54504A, 54520A, 54520C, 54540A, 54540C, 54542A, 54542C, 54600B, 54601A, 54601B, 54602B, 54603B,? 54645A, 54654N, 54710A, 54720A, 54750A, 54825N, E1428,?
- Oven controlled crystal oscillators (OCXOs)
- Pattern generators
- PCM terminal test set
- Phase noise measurement
- Pico ammeters
- Printers 2225
- Plotters 7470A, 7475A?
- Probes
- Protocol analyzers and exercisers.
- Power booster test sets
- Power meters 431A, 431B, 431C, 432A, 435A, 435B, 437B, 438A
- Power splitters
- Power supplies
- Pulse generators
- Q-meters 4342A?
- Q-meter calibration inductors 16470A
- Reflection transmission test set
- Return loss module (optical)
- Relays / switches / switch matrices (optical)
- Relays / switches / switch matrices (RF)
- Resistor standards 42030A?and 42100A
- S-parameter test sets
- Scalar network analyzers
- SCSI bus preprocessor interface E2324A
- Selective level meters 3746A
- Semiconductors
- Semiconductor parameter analyzers 4145A, 4155B, 4156B,
- Signal analyzers
- Signal generators / sweep generators / signal sources / oscillators 200CD, 201B, 209A, 204D,? 608A,? 8165A
- Software
- Source measure units
- Spectrum analyzers 4195A,???
- Switch control units
- SWR meter 415E?
- Time interval? counters
- Time mark generator 226A
- Timing and data state modules
- Torque wrenches
- Transmitter testers
- Trigger modules
- Ultrasound transducers
- Universal bridge? 4260A, 4265A, 4265B?
- Vacuum tube voltmeter 410C
- Vector Impedance Meter 4193A, 4800A, 4815A
- Vector Network Analyzers (VNAs) 4195A,? 8510A, 8510B, 8510C, 8753A, 8753B, 8753C, 8753D, 8753E, 8753ES, 8752ET, 8719A, 8719B, 8719C, 8719D, 8720A, 8720B, 8720C, 8720D, 8720ES, 8722A, 8722B, 8722C, 8722D, 8722ES,
- Vector Network Analyzers (VNA) calibration kits 85032B, 85032E, 85033C, 85033D, 85033E, 85050B, 85050C, 85050D, 85052B, 85052C, 85052D, 85054A, 85054B, 85054D, 85056A
- Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) verification kits
- Vector Signal Analyzer 89650S, 89600S
- Vector voltmeters 8405A, 8508A,
- VXI mainframes 70000B, 70000C
- Waveform and function generators
- Waveguide to waveguide and waveguide to coaxial transitions.
- Wireless 58 OTA chambers
- Wireless channel emulators
- Wireless network emulators
- Wireless communication test sets
?
Re: 4195A question
Hey friends
sorry for my late reply. But the last few days it has been such nice weather that I spent most of my time outside and was not hanging out in my home lab :-) and also didn't check the emails too frequently. So my apologies for that, but I didn't forget this thread. I can share the Python source code as soon as I have a more readable version of it. The current one is quite ugly I must say. But I sent messages off-list to some of you. |
Re: Opens and shorts for 4285A LCR meter owners
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHello, and it's off:
With best regards Tam HANNA Enjoy electronics? Join 15k7 other followers by visiting the Crazy Electronics Lab at On 2020. 04. 13. 2:41, Dr. David
Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd wrote:
|
Re: GPSDO connected to external ref inputs
That's 4 Volts peak to peak unterminated. 2 Volts peak to peak or +10 dBm into 50 ohms, which I assume the 5343A and 8566A have.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
As to radiation, not as far as I know. I've not tried to work the HF band that I hear gets obliterated by stray 10 MHz from distribution systems. Unless one takes care with double shielded coax and terminators on all unused outputs. Not there with the ham radio gear yet (will take recommendations on a 70 cm capable rig, though). Thanks. Jim ------ Original Message ------
From: "Bruce" <bruce@...> To: [email protected] Sent: 4/13/2020 9:25:03 AM Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] GPSDO connected to external ref inputs No problem - I do think 4v is a bit high though - any radiation problems? |
Re: GPSDO connected to external ref inputs
The output of my x10 dist amp was running at about +12 dBm driving two radios and seven TE.? I put a 10dB pad on the input side because my Icom IC-9700 was complaining about the high level.? e.g.,?? Your +10 dBm is about 5 dB higher than normal practice but definitely won't hurt anything even if not mitigated.
best regards.... Frank Mackowick / WA3NHK |
Re: GPSDO connected to external ref inputs
Jim, ? I have a HP 5087A distribution amp feeding output from an older HP Z3816 GPSDO to several pieces of equipment.? These include: ? Agilent E4425B signal generator Agilent 8714ET network analyzer EIP 548A microwave frequency counter HP 3575A gain/phase meter HP 5335A counter HP 8920A RF communication test set HP 53310A modulation domain analyzer HP K34-9991A phase comparator PTS 250 frequency synthesizer Tracor 527E frequency difference meter Tracor 895A linear phase/time comparator Wayne Kerr PSG2400L signal generator ? Except for the Z3816/5087 units most of the driven equipment is in a power-down state unless needed.? The port on the 527E is switchable to an external connector on the bench for other test applications.? In all, I feed one volt p-p or less to all of the equipment and it stays happy.? The advantage with the 5087A is that each output is individually adjustable to suit the needs of the attached hardware. ? If any of your units cannot tolerate a 4V amplitude I suggest that you pick up an in-line 50 ohm attenuator either from your favorite auction site or from Mini-Circuits (no affiliation however I rely on them for their low-cost high-quality products).? 4 volts does seem a little excessive for most external reference inputs since I am assuming you are referring to RMS amplitude and not peak-to-peak value. ? Greg |
opt 001 upgrade of a 8511A, 8512A or 8515A
Can this be done as user upgrade? Has anyone done this or know of documentation for doing it?
I just bought an 08510-60102 for $65, so buying one or two more to allow multiplexing at that price would suit me. The IF mulitpexer board is available for $100 so I figure $200 or less to add a cable and multiplexer if I am patient. Thanks, Reg |
Re: GPSDO connected to external ref inputs
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks, Clif.? One more data point on the curve. Jim Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Clif Holland <clif@...> Date: 4/13/20 5:08 AM (GMT-08:00) Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] GPSDO connected to external ref inputs |
hp8350b/hp83595a front panel mod
Hi all,
I'm trying to get my RF output on the front panel instead of at the rear on an hp83595a (26.5 GHz), while leaving the rear-panel option intact. I already have the front-panel connector from ebay and need to make a semi-rigid with 3.5mm connectors to (I guess, need to verify) the 55 dB attenuator. Does anyone know what type of semi-rigid is used by HP in the hp83595a for the RF output and/or has suggestions for sourcing the connectors? (Sorry, complete semi-rigid noob here...) BTW, the front-panel connector I have is an APC3.5 feed through. Thanks, Jan |
Re: Bill West keytop puller
On 4/13/20 11:43 AM, Chuck Harris wrote:
As to deoxit being bunkum: I disagree. It improves the contact,I was wondering what "bunkum" meant. I stopped wondering whether DeOxit was any good when I had a tour of NIST in Maryland many years ago. There were cans of it everywhere. That told me all I needed to know; I went home and placed an order, and have been using it ever since. The makers do get needlessly huckstery about their product.That they do. I think that harms their credibility in the eyes of people who don't know their products' reputation, or those who have never heard of Cramolin. Fader lube is wonderful for resurrecting pots of all kinds.Yes. And their gold wipes are fantastic for gold-plated card-edge connectors. They leave a very slight bit of lubricant behind that makes boards much, much easier to insert and remove. We go through them like crazy at the museum, for Unibus and Qbus boards in particular. (you know how tough they can be to insert and remove) -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA |
Re: GPSDO connected to external ref inputs
No problem - I do think 4v is a bit high though - any radiation problems?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Cheers! Quoting Jim Ford <james.ford@...>: Thanks, Bruce and Lou.I figured as long as the units were powered up |
Re: HP 334A Balance Pots
Understood. It turned out that disassembling the pot wasn't all that difficult. Maybe I can remember to report back next year... ;)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks, Barry - N4BUQ ----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Wise" <david_wise@...> |
Re: HP 334A Balance Pots
That's good news, Barry. I didn't mean to advocate drilling except as a last resort. In my case the track was bad, with high end-to-end resistance.
Please report in a year; I'd like to know how well the cleaning persists. Dave Wise ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of n4buq via groups.io <n4buq@...> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 3:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 334A Balance Pots I'm happy to report that I was able to disassemble the noisy pot, clean out the carbon dust, put a couple of drops of DeoxiT on the moving parts (wish I had FaderLub but...) and reassembled it. It works so well now! Glad I decided to do that. Thanks, Barry - N4BUQ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry" <n4buq@...> |
Re: Bill West keytop puller
On this, I have to completely agree: There is no cause to
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
remove the key caps from these keyboards to clean any part. The keycaps become essentially welded on after a quarter century. Where they may have pulled off easily when they were new (if you used the manufacturer sanctioned puller), now, things break. The best way I have found to service these keyboards is to wash them liberally with IPA. Liberally, meaning soaking, dripping wet over a pan. I use a pump sprayer filled with IPA over a pan to collect the wash. I soak every part of the key mechanism, while pressing the key multiple times to help wash the grease that HP so foolishly used, out from under the springs. After a thorough wash, I shake, and then blow off the remaining IPA. No lubrication is necessary, or even desirable. None. Don't do it. If a spring has taken a set, just bend it back to straight, and put it back. As to deoxit being bunkum: I disagree. It improves the contact, and does so for a long, long time. I am not saying that something else wouldn't work... show me something better. The makers do get needlessly huckstery about their product. Fader lube is wonderful for resurrecting pots of all kinds. -Chuck Harris Roy Thistle wrote: On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 02:05 PM, Maurice Smulders wrote:AT |
Re: 5343A troubles
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks for all the replies, ? further poking hasn't revealed much yet, though I haven't completely ruled out the front end connector yet (seems solid though). Power supplies seem ok. ? I'm slightly suspicious of the sampler driver at this point. It occurs to me that if somehow that were damaged in a way that suppressed even harmonics (idk how that could occur yet though) this seems like the symptoms that I'd expect to see. ? Further troubleshooting of that is on hold while I fix my 8555A, which apparently decided now was the perfect time to lose its +10V and +20V power supply:( But once that's fixed I'll come back to this. ? Best, Daniel ? ? From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Askild <megafluffy@...> ? Hi Daniel, ? Check the power lines for ripple. I have a HP 5351B dumpster find, that did not work to well, needed higher input level, and did not work on all frequencies... It was missing one of the capacitors in the power supply, so lots of ripple. After finding the missing cap, and putting in a new one, it behaved great. ? Might not be your issue, but its an easy check.. ? BR, Askild ? ? On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:49 PM Daniel Sheen <danielsheen5@...> wrote:
|
Re: HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 13 Apr 2020, at 13:13, george edmonds via groups.io <G6HIG@...> wrote:
|
Re: HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration
Hi Colin CLIP stands for Component Layout Information Package, HP speak for circuit diagrams and board layouts. When you get a service manual for later HP kit it is the text only, the interesting stuff is in the CLIP. Kind regards George G6HIG On Monday, 13 April 2020, 11:28:34 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: Hi George, ? Now were motoring! I was unaware of Amtronix, thanks. Clearly they must know and perhaps might help. ? You will have to inlighten me as to what the CLIP is, please? ? Kind regards ? Colin ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of george edmonds via groups.io
Sent: 13 April 2020 10:32 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration ? Hi Colin On Monday, 13 April 2020, 07:25:14 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: ? ? Hi George, ? Just measured, the unit is substantially flat (+/-0.2dB) across the range from 1MHz -500MHz, but with the Main input around -2.2dB and Ant input -2.6dB. But these back my point that for a subsidiary function this Spec An is very good indeed. ? The Main input shows >-25dB return loss, I am yet to measure the Ant input. ? Looking at the Spec An block diagram two things stick out:- ? -?????????A signal switch near the front with a Cal setting -?????????A 4-in-1 DAC which seems to control variable gain amp as well as IF filters ? So I remain thinking that ?I¡¯m on the hunt for a deeply buried Cal routine. Fiddling with loss internally is clearly possible (from another rreply), but only finding the routine would be future proof. ? Thanks for info about that HP IEEE 488 program. My Win95 machine does still boot up¡??J Gonna have to find an IEEE488 card though. Or info on what the code drives. ? Rgds ? Colin ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of george edmonds via groups.io ? Hi Colin On Sunday, 12 April 2020, 22:18:40 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: ? ? Hi all, |
Re: HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýCLIP == Component Level Information Pack == Schematics and Parts Lists (no sorry no Theory of Operation sections) ? David ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Colin Smithers
Sent: 13 April 2020 11:28 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration ? Hi George, ? Now were motoring! I was unaware of Amtronix, thanks. Clearly they must know and perhaps might help. ? You will have to inlighten me as to what the CLIP is, please? ? Kind regards ? Colin ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of george edmonds via groups.io ? Hi Colin On Monday, 13 April 2020, 07:25:14 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: ? ? Hi George, ? Just measured, the unit is substantially flat (+/-0.2dB) across the range from 1MHz -500MHz, but with the Main input around -2.2dB and Ant input -2.6dB. But these back my point that for a subsidiary function this Spec An is very good indeed. ? The Main input shows >-25dB return loss, I am yet to measure the Ant input. ? Looking at the Spec An block diagram two things stick out:- ? -?????????A signal switch near the front with a Cal setting -?????????A 4-in-1 DAC which seems to control variable gain amp as well as IF filters ? So I remain thinking that ?I¡¯m on the hunt for a deeply buried Cal routine. Fiddling with loss internally is clearly possible (from another rreply), but only finding the routine would be future proof. ? Thanks for info about that HP IEEE 488 program. My Win95 machine does still boot up¡??J Gonna have to find an IEEE488 card though. Or info on what the code drives. ? Rgds ? Colin ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of george edmonds via groups.io ? Hi Colin On Sunday, 12 April 2020, 22:18:40 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: ? ? Hi all, |
Re: HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi George, ? Now were motoring! I was unaware of Amtronix, thanks. Clearly they must know and perhaps might help. ? You will have to inlighten me as to what the CLIP is, please? ? Kind regards ? Colin ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of george edmonds via groups.io
Sent: 13 April 2020 10:32 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration ? Hi Colin On Monday, 13 April 2020, 07:25:14 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: ? ? Hi George, ? Just measured, the unit is substantially flat (+/-0.2dB) across the range from 1MHz -500MHz, but with the Main input around -2.2dB and Ant input -2.6dB. But these back my point that for a subsidiary function this Spec An is very good indeed. ? The Main input shows >-25dB return loss, I am yet to measure the Ant input. ? Looking at the Spec An block diagram two things stick out:- ? -?????????A signal switch near the front with a Cal setting -?????????A 4-in-1 DAC which seems to control variable gain amp as well as IF filters ? So I remain thinking that ?I¡¯m on the hunt for a deeply buried Cal routine. Fiddling with loss internally is clearly possible (from another rreply), but only finding the routine would be future proof. ? Thanks for info about that HP IEEE 488 program. My Win95 machine does still boot up¡??J Gonna have to find an IEEE488 card though. Or info on what the code drives. ? Rgds ? Colin ? From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of george edmonds via groups.io ? Hi Colin On Sunday, 12 April 2020, 22:18:40 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: ? ? Hi all, |
Re: HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration
Hi Colin I do not understand the posting about making manual adjustments, I can see that using the suggested approach for fault finding is valid, but not for adjusting the calibration given that the 8920A is software calibrated only. The calibration constants are held in none volatile memory in each module which are read into main ram on power up. As far as I remember the Cal switch just enables and disables the ability to carry out a calibration via the GPIB port. Prior to 1999 all 8920A's had a mechanical attenuator, which your appears to have. It then became option 055 with the PIN diode attenuator as option 009. The only remaining commercial support for the 8920A is provided by Amtronix in the US, who do provide full repair and calibration facilities for them. Are you aware of the information at Amtronix.com/diagnostic/htm? Do you have the CLIP for the 8920A, I do if you need it. Regards George G6HIG On Monday, 13 April 2020, 07:25:14 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: Hi George, ? Just measured, the unit is substantially flat (+/-0.2dB) across the range from 1MHz -500MHz, but with the Main input around -2.2dB and Ant input -2.6dB. But these back my point that for a subsidiary function this Spec An is very good indeed. ? The Main input shows >-25dB return loss, I am yet to measure the Ant input. ? Looking at the Spec An block diagram two things stick out:- ? -?????????A signal switch near the front with a Cal setting -?????????A 4-in-1 DAC which seems to control variable gain amp as well as IF filters ? So I remain thinking that ?I¡¯m on the hunt for a deeply buried Cal routine. Fiddling with loss internally is clearly possible (from another rreply), but only finding the routine would be future proof. ? Thanks for info about that HP IEEE 488 program. My Win95 machine does still boot up¡??J Gonna have to find an IEEE488 card though. Or info on what the code drives. ? Rgds ? Colin ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of george edmonds via groups.io
Sent: 13 April 2020 00:37 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 8920A spectrum analyser amplitude calibration ? Hi Colin On Sunday, 12 April 2020, 22:18:40 BST, Colin Smithers <colin@...> wrote: ? ? Hi all, |