On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Kuba Ober wrote:
It looks like you don't understand what mail reader is.
Just remember, there are other OSes than Windoze. There are also text mode
mail clients that doesn't show all those behemytes of stupid html code
automatically. BTW, e-mail was there even before Windoze.
Have you ever happened to look at email headers? Do you think "Me too"
message constitutes a whole percent of the entire email?
Economy nonwithstanding can you explain why anybody would keep many separate
messages instead of one including the entire thread? Do you think one would
enjoy many thousands of messages to navigate through? Do you understand how
many messages e.g. LKML or U-Boot developers' mailing list generates?
Please note that people who are really busy delete _EVERYTHING_ "Me too"
without reading and won't chase any threads unless absolutely necessary.
And no, mail readers don't thread messages.
Are you using a mail client that doesn¡¯t keep threads together? Resending
all of that stuff seems wasteful, it¡¯s not as if the previous messages
disappear into the void¡ Any sane email client will show the replied-to
messages preceding the reply itself. Isn¡¯t that so?
Cheers, Kuba
29 okt. 2018 kl. 14:23 skrev Artekmedia <manuals@...>:
That should have said : I for one just delete threads that DO NOT include prior continuity...more is the loss
On 10/29/2018 2:19 PM, Artekmedia wrote:
_*AMEN !
*_
David K , Mr List Owner: One of things that changed from Yahoo to groups .IO. IN yahoo when using the website interface??? it automatically included the prior message(s) when replying, with Groups IO the default is NOT to include the prior message without the person replying taking an extra step. IS there anyway to change the default reply format with in the IO interface? Those of us using our own mail clients generally don't have the problem but those using the web interface to reply do.
I for one just delete threads that include prior continuity...more is the loss
Dave
manuals@...
On 10/29/2018 1:13 PM, Glenn Little wrote:
This is the problem when people insist on not quoting the original message and appropriate replies.
A little net etiquette goes a long way and reduces questions and confusion.
Glenn
On 10/29/2018 12:41 PM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Goran Finnberg wrote:
Sergey Kubushyn:
2N4401 is _NOT_ a transistor. It is THYRISTOR aka SCR.
Sorry, no.
The 2N4401 is an NPN transistor.
Datasheet here:
www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/2N4401-D.PDF
I think 4401 is a typo -- it is a TO-92 transistor and original post was
about 2N4101 in TO-66 package:
pdf.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheets/newjerseysemiconductor/2N4101-2N4102.pdf
There is no 2N4401 in TO-66; it is a low power general purpose transistor,
nothing special.
---
*
* KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
* Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
*
Sergey Kubushyn