¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: HP 5086-7906 YTO


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

hello Yves, great repair that of the opt 130
In my case the opt 130 has always worked well and I have never needed to study it in detail
Did you do the realignment by adjusting the trimmers on the board itself?
The adventure with my 8595E continues
To sum up, after my last email I focused on a more accurate and uniform alignment of the SYTF. With the help of the microscope, a strong light source, a precision power supply and a fairly reliable frequency source I obtained an insertion loss as per the attached excel file
After reassembling the RF front-end everything worked fine again, including the MXR CAL routine that?used to?give the?error? "insufficient harmonics"
When I moved from the "messy" version (pic)? reinserting everything into its space (which is very crowded, also due to the existence, in my case, of the tracking gen)?and connected?the SA input to CAL OUT I observed a type of intermittent noise, in the form of spikes of intensity about -60dBm that appear and disappear in the area of ??the highest harmonics (I already checked the?CAL OUT signal; it?is clean and fine)
Now I think I will have to re-disassemble the front-end (ouch) and try to understand from where does this noise originate :-(?
If you are interested I?can send you a short video of the problem (don't think I?can post videos here)
Thanks for asking, Yves
Adri
?

----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: Yves Tardif via groups.io <yves_tardif@...>
Rispondi a: <[email protected]>
Inviato: 18/09/2024 23:47:21
Oggetto: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 5086-7906 YTO

Hi Adri,

?

I had borrowed a faulty 8595E from a friend to study the second converter.

?

The problem with this 8595E was that the AMP CAL was not working and displayed an error message pointing to option 130 (narrow resolution bandwidth).

Looking at the calibration constants, I noticed the calibration values ??were very far apart for some filters.

After checking, I had no choice but to realign the filters.

I followed the procedures and the problem was solved.

This Spectrum had no hardware defects and option 130 had no problem.

So, I did the full calibration, and voila, this 8595E now has a second life.

?

Have you managed to get your 8595E working properly again?

?

Before filters adjustments at left, and after at right.

?

Yves

?

?

?

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de alfa beta
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 13 septembre 2024 19:14
??: [email protected]
Objet?: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 5086-7906 YTO

?

Yves, thanks for the info about the 2nd converter? After having installed the one bought on the bay?I checked?the original one?on the bench and it?seems to work normally

?

I'm starting to suspect the blindness on the LOW BAND was due to a bad connection I did when the repair was suspended years ago ¡­ ouch !

?

Meanwhile I'm investigating?a certain deafness on the HIGH BAND (from 2.4 to 11 dB)

?

I measured the insertion loss of the SYTF I had realigned and found figures?from 5.2??to? 8.5 dB on the range? 3 to 6 GHz

?

These figures?seem not too bad?and?the AMP CAL routine should be able to recover them ...unless there is some hardware problem in the generation of the tuning current (I performed the insertion loss measurements by manually tuning? with an external precision power supply)

Will see ...

Adri

?

?

?

?

----- Messaggio originale -----

Da: Yves Tardif via groups.io <yves_tardif@...>

Rispondi a: <[email protected]>

Inviato: 13/09/2024 07:51:28

Oggetto: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 5086-7906 YTO


Hi Adri,

?

A friend of mine had a faulty 8595E, the problem comes from the option card 130.

But I took the opportunity to look at the second converter, so here are some details on this module.

?

Regards

Yves

?

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de alfa beta
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 10 septembre 2024 16:26
??:
[email protected]
Objet?: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 5086-7906 YTO

?

hello Yves,
I received the 2nd converter and, after testing it on the bench (if you are interested I will give you the two test configurations) I installed it and voil¨¤, the machine is back to working like in the old days
It passes the amplitude and frequency calibrations and the confidence test without any problem
As it happened before the death of the YTO the analyzer still has a certain "deafness" after 5.5GHz
By virtue of the alignment of the spheres that I did a few weeks ago The defect is milder than it was then and I think it is due to a sub-optimal loss of insertion of the SYTF A3A2

?

As proof of the "deafness", while all the calibration routines, including the CAL YTF routine are performed without problems, the CAL MXR is not completed and gives the message CAL: HARMONICS INSUFFICIENT In fact I attach a screen of the 300MHz calibration signal from which it would seem that the very last harmonics are missing
Thank you in advance if can you send the analogous screen of your analyzer
In a few days I will receive a more reliable 6GHz RF generator than the current one and I will use it to try to perfect the alignment
Yves, I think that now you can reassemble and close your analyzer :-) Many thanks for all the measurements that you sent me and that were useful to trace the problem!
Adri

?

----- Messaggio originale -----

Da: Yves Tardif via groups.io <yves_tardif@...>

Rispondi a: <[email protected]>

Inviato: 08/09/2024 01:35:49

Oggetto: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 5086-7906 YTO


Hi Adri

?

Here are the measurements connected to the first 2 converters as a reference.

?

For the second converter I get a voltage of -1.678V instead of -3.5V as written in the service manual, I would say that we have similar voltages for this particular point.

It seems far from the nominal point, but there may be an error in the manual.

?

You are close to the goal, and this module may be repairable if there is no micro circuit, I have never opened a second converter in this series, but it is a possibility.

?

When you open your second converter, send me pictures, I'm curious.

?

Yves

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de alfa beta
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 6 septembre 2024 19:30
??:
[email protected]
Objet?: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 5086-7906 YTO

?

dear Yves, I didn't realize that you had made the measurements expressly to help me! I owe you then a double (even triple) thanks! Especially considering the fact that the front end of this instrument is really very dense, complicated and delicate!

After my last email, in addition to doing the (essentially mechanical) intervention on the SYTF, I continued to check the input signal through the various sections by alternately injecting 300MHz @-20dBm and 5GHz @0 dBm

The signals were found to be in specification up to the A3A9 bandpass (where the two paths join to form the intermediate frequency of 321.4MHz). At this point I could see the 5GHz signal (converted), present at that point at -47dBm (the specification says -43/-56dBm).
Instead, no trace of the 300MHz input signal


Investigatine?the second converter A3A4 in more depth
I checked?the signals at its input


On J1 there is 3.9214GHz at -46dBm? --->OK
On J3 there is 321.4MHz @ -37.7dBm? --->OK
On J4 I did not check 600MHz @-1dBm but the fact that the converter works in band 1 tells me that the oscillator is present and is in specification


The power supply is quite OK (5V are actually 4.75; 10V are 9.98 and the DC that controls the internal switch that should be +15V? (band 0) and -3.5V?(band 1) is actually +14.60V and -1.35V

?

This last value is rather far from the nominal and would have worried me BUT band 1 is exactly the one that works

Conclusion: it would seem that the culprit is the second converter and in particular (probably) the internal switch that has the sole task of letting the signal? (which is already at 321.4MHz and does not need to be converted)?pass from its input to the output


In the next few days I will test the converter that meanwhile?has been?disassembled?; In the meantime I found a cheap one on the bay that should arrive in about ten days


Yves, I have a question: on the block diagram A3A4 is represented as a block that has 5 ports of which one (J5) would seem to be the connector that carries the power and the DC that controls the switch and that connects to A7 Analog Interface through the W35 cable

?

Actually,?this connector on the real component, does not have a name
Instead,?the name J5?, stamped on the case , indicates an SMB connector that has the writing LO TEST and in my analyzer?it is the one that?conveys the 600MHz LO signal?

Now,?on the block diagram the connector that conveys the 600MHz signal has the name J4 (in my analyzer, the J4 connector was disconnected)

?

This confusion of names and roles made me doubt that years ago, when I had disassembled this section I had not reassembled it correctly

thanks again and best regards

Adri

?

?

?

----- Messaggio originale -----

Da: Yves Tardif via groups.io <yves_tardif@...>

Rispondi a: <[email protected]>

Inviato: 06/09/2024 23:21:52

Oggetto: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 5086-7906 YTO


Hi Adri,

?

I had sent you the measurements of the RF input-output mixer signals verification, I had disassembled the High Frequency section of my 8595E to be able to provide you with this information.

If you have no more questions relating to this section, I will close my 8595E and do a flatness check to see if everything is correct.

?

Yves

?

De?: [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de alfa beta
·¡²Ô±¹´Ç²â¨¦?: 31 ao?t 2024 12:23
??:
[email protected]
Objet?: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] HP 5086-7906 YTO

?

Yves,

thank you very much for all the suggestions and information with which I will continue my investigation
In the meantime I received the 2.5mm socket wrench and after?a little mod to adapt it?for the purpose (photo), I proceeded to align the spheres of the SYTF


I must say that the operation done under the microscope is quite simple

The nuts must be loosened (not too much) and with a small screwdriver that acts as a delicate lever, ?the supports of?the?spheres can be moved so that the coupling ring completely shadows them (i.e. the sphere is exactly in the center)
Removing the gold mesh was not necessary
The insertion loss has improved enormously:
at 5 GHz it is -6dBm at 6GHz it is -10dB (before the signal starting from this frequency was no longer visible) at 6.5 GHz it is only -3dB
I will install it when I have solved the problem of "blindness" in band 0 since the calibration constants that the instrument has in memory (in practice the tuning current data) are relative to the original SYTF and the "new" SYTW requires a? SYTF CAL is done

Adri

?

?

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.