FWIW I had a faulty section in one of these style of attenuators,
when I took it apart there was some corrosion around one of the
resistor chips where it was grounded to the aluminium body, cleaned
it up and it's been fine for (some years) since.
As Ozan says, dig in to it and see what you find, you may be lucky!
On 06/09/2024 19:03, Ozan wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi Jinxie,
If 0dB attenuation was damaged because of over voltage it
would have damaged a lot more. It is very likely some mechanical
problem like sticky o-rings. Your phase detector repair was a
lot more complex, why don't you try repairing the attenuator
first? Worst case is you need a new one so nothing to lose. It
may be obvious but I will mention it: Once attenuator is out can
test it with a DVM by terminating to 50-ohms at DVM and applying
DC voltage. Just do 20*log(Vo/Vi). This attenuator doesn't have
a DC block in it so DC would work.?
Ozan
?
?
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 10:14 AM, Jinxie wrote:
Hi Vladan,
?
Many thanks indeed for your observations. I was certainly
aware that the Analyzer would no longer 'know' what level of
attenuation was being applied to the source RF and that I
would have to manually account for it, but provided that
doesn't put any of the downstream circuitry at risk of
damage, it's an inconvenience I may have no alternative but
to live with.
This SA was owned by an RF engineer and I purchase it
from him about 10 years ago along with a faulty
Marconi/Aeroflex RF signal generator with a disclosed fault.
No faults were disclosed in regards to the SA, however. The
sig gen I was able to repair and it's a valuable item of
equipment to have for all sorts of reasons. Anyway the fact
that the seller disclosed the sig gen fault leads me to
believe he was honest and was unaware of any issue with the
SA. However, I've never done anything with that SA which
could burn out the 0 and 10dB settings either, having used
it solely for monitoring the RF environment around me using
a short telescopic antenna, so no physical connection to the
RF input.
As I mentioned, I do have an HP 8495K 0-70dB attenuator
which might save the day. I don't think there are any issues
with that. However, it's NOT the same type as the one in the
8566B...