Ing. Patricio A. Greco Taller Aeron¨¢utico de Reparaci¨®n 1B-349 Organizaci¨®n de Mantenimiento Aeron¨¢utico de la Defensa OMAD-001 Gral. Mart¨ªn Rodr¨ªguez 2159 San Miguel (1663) Buenos Aires T:?+5411-4455-2557 F:?+5411-4032-0072
On 13 Apr 2022, at 22:34, Tom Lee <tomlee@...> wrote:
?
What you say is largely true for the 1/f^2 part of the spectrum, but
for close-in (1/f^3) phase noise, the device itself makes a large
difference.
--Tom
--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070
On 4/13/2022 18:32, Patricio A. Greco
via groups.io wrote:
Phase noise is a characteristic of high Q resonant cavity . Or
course the transistors incides but more the resonant circuit .?
Ing.
Patricio A.
Greco Taller
Aeron¨¢utico de
Reparaci¨®n
1B-349 Organizaci¨®n
de
Mantenimiento
Aeron¨¢utico de
la Defensa
OMAD-001 Gral.
Mart¨ªn
Rodr¨ªguez 2159 San
Miguel (1663) Buenos
Aires T:?+5411-4455-2557 F:?+5411-4032-0072
On 13 Apr 2022, at 22:16, Lothar baier
<Lothar@...> wrote:
?
For best phase-noise I would recommend
finding a SiGe Device like the BFP740 or similar ,
Infineon and NXP both make great devices
?
From:[email protected]<[email protected]>On Behalf Of Tom Lee via groups.io Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 7:15 PM To:[email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment]
HP8640B RF Fails Several Seconds After Power Up
?
Re: Ft overhead: Keep in mind that you
need more gain than the minimum that sustains oscillation
in the absence of a load -- you need enough to support the
power delivered to a load. On top of that, you don't want
the frequency of oscillation to be affected too much by
the transistor's own phase shift -- you want the resonator
to control it. All those considerations argue for a
healthy ft margin. I'm sure you could sub a somewhat
slower transistor and still get output, but you will
sacrifice some of the famous (and hard-fought) stability
for which the HP8640B is prized.
-- Cheers
Tom
--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070
On 4/13/2022 16:44, Flannel Tuba
wrote:
Thank you, Arie for finding a link to the actual
scanned? article! Having the pictures along with he text
is quite a nice addition.
Meanwhile, I have ordered a smattering of VHF and UHF
transistors from Mouser with marginally similar ratings
to those Tom provided. I do wonder about the fT of 5GHz
though. The oscillator's range is from 230-550MHz, so I
wonder why the extreme frequency overhead margin. I went
ahead and ordered a dozen or so potential replacements
having at least the Vcbo of 30v, Vceo of 20v, Vebo of 4v
and fT of over 600MHz with several in the 1-5GHz range.
A couple are TO92 packages, which I envision just
folding the base lead across the top to make contact
with the grounding hex cap nut/cover, but most are
SOT-23, which I'll have to come up with an adapter of
some sort for. Any ideas on this are more than welcome.?
Well, if I'm lucky I'll have some time in the next few
weekends to experiment with possible replacements for
the rare and venerable HP 5086-7082.