Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Re: BS, was Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] Spread the word -- Swap Meet Returns!
Yep, I've used ferric chloride, and one of the disadvantages was that the etch product (copper chloride?) is dark and opaque and collects over the copper being etched. So agitation is in order, so that you can 1) see that the etching process is progressing, and 2) prevent the etch product from slowing or stopping the etching process. I'd heard of people putting marbles in the bottom of the etch tank and putting the board to be etched upside-down so that the etch product just falls off the board. But you can't easily monitor the process.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
And monitoring is necessary; my first attempt back in the late 1980's failed because I had bad etchant. I left it sit with a heater under the tank for at least 10 hours while I went to work at my day job, and it didn't etch at all. Got another bottle of ferric chloride, and the second attempt was done in about 10 minutes. With some bumps every few seconds to move the etch product off the board. IIRC, I diluted the waste in the tank with lots of cold water and poured it down the toilet. Jim Ford ------ Original Message ------
From: "Lothar baier" <Lothar@...> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: 3/20/2022 2:21:46 PM Subject: Re: BS, was Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] Spread the word -- Swap Meet Returns! Ferric cloride wasn¡¯t used commercially for PCB making in Germany probably because of the potential impact on worker health but also because it was pretty aggressive, most companies used ammonia persulfate compositions one advantage of the stuff was that it was transparent so you were able to watch the progress of the etching. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss