¿ªÔÆÌåÓýBTW, I was wrong about a 40 dB section, which I discovered after looking at the Service Guide. There is such a section in that model. I suspect that since it only had to meet performance specs up to 2.9 GHz, the leakage wasn¡¯t a big issue. I am usually dealing with frequencies at 10 GHz or higher and that was what I was thinking here. Sorry. ? ¡°Õ´Ç³¾ ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of n8zmTWH@...
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment] 8594E input attenuator issue? ? The through readings will vary with the value of the attenuation, but the to-ground readings should all be close to 50 Ohms with a 50 Ohm termination in place, as you said you did. ? I took a quick look on Keysight¡¯s website for that model of attenuator, and it is obsolete. There doesn¡¯t seem to be a replacement recommendation. I ran out of time but will dig a little deeper to see if the substrates are still available for it. ? Tom. ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Nicolas Mailloux ? Ozan?: These measurements are from input to output. PAD 2 : 81.69 ohm PAD 3 : 98.04 ohm PAD 4 : 51.65 ohm ? These are from input to ground : PAD 2 : 51.05 ohm PAD 3 : 49.95 ohm PAD 4 : 60.96 Ohm ? There are from output to ground : PAD 2 : 51.10 PAD 3 : 50.16 PAD 4 : 61.23 ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ozan ? On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 07:58 AM, Nicolas Mailloux wrote:
|
